IMMUNE INJURY
Ed Friedlander, M.D., Pathologist
scalpel_blade@yahoo.com

Cyberfriends: The help you're looking for is probably here.

Welcome to Ed's Pathology Notes, placed here originally for the convenience of medical students at my school. You need to check the accuracy of any information, from any source, against other credible sources. I cannot diagnose or treat over the web, I cannot comment on the health care you have already received, and these notes cannot substitute for your own doctor's care. I am good at helping people find resources and answers. If you need me, send me an E-mail at scalpel_blade@yahoo.com Your confidentiality is completely respected.

DoctorGeorge.com is a larger, full-time service. There is also a fee site at myphysicians.com, and another at www.afraidtoask.com.

Translate this page automatically

Freely have you received, give freely With one of four large boxes of "Pathguy" replies.

I'm still doing my best to answer everybody. Sometimes I get backlogged, sometimes my E-mail crashes, and sometimes my literature search software crashes. If you've not heard from me in a week, post me again. I send my most challenging questions to the medical student pathology interest group, minus the name, but with your E-mail where you can receive a reply.

Numbers in {curly braces} are from the magnificent Slice of Life videodisk. No medical student should be without access to this wonderful resource. Someday you may be able to access these pictures directly from this page.

I am presently adding clickable links to images in these notes. Let me know about good online sources in addition to these:

Freely have you received, freely give. -- Matthew 10:8. My site receives an enormous amount of traffic, and I'm handling about 200 requests for information weekly, all as a public service.

Pathology's modern founder, Rudolf Virchow M.D., left a legacy of realism and social conscience for the discipline. I am a mainstream Christian, a man of science, and a proponent of common sense and common kindness. I am an outspoken enemy of all the make-believe and bunk that interfere with peoples' health, reasonable freedom, and happiness. I talk and write straight, and without apology.

Throughout these notes, I am speaking only for myself, and not for any employer, organization, or associate.

Special thanks to my friend and colleague, Charles Wheeler M.D., pathologist and former Kansas City mayor. Thanks also to the real Patch Adams M.D., who wrote me encouragement when we were both beginning our unusual medical careers.

If you're a private individual who's enjoyed this site, and want to say, "Thank you, Ed!", then what I'd like best is a contribution to the Episcopalian home for abandoned, neglected, and abused kids in Nevada:

I've spent time there and they are good. Write "Thanks Ed" on your check.

Help me help others

My home page
More of my notes
My medical students

Especially if you're looking for information on a disease with a name that you know, here are a couple of great places for you to go right now and use Medline, which will allow you to find every relevant current scientific publication. You owe it to yourself to learn to use this invaluable internet resource. Not only will you find some information immediately, but you'll have references to journal articles that you can obtain by interlibrary loan, plus the names of the world's foremost experts and their institutions.

Alternative (complementary) medicine has made real progress since my generally-unfavorable 1983 review linked below. If you are interested in complementary medicine, then I would urge you to visit my new Alternative Medicine page. If you are looking for something on complementary medicine, please go first to the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians. And for your enjoyment... here are some of my old pathology exams for medical school undergraduates.

I cannot examine every claim that my correspondents share with me. Sometimes the independent thinkers prove to be correct, and paradigms shift as a result. You also know that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. When a discovery proves to square with the observable world, scientists make reputations by confirming it, and corporations are soon making profits from it. When a decades-old claim by a "persecuted genius" finds no acceptance from mainstream science, it probably failed some basic experimental tests designed to eliminate self-deception. If you ask me about something like this, I will simply invite you to do some tests yourself, perhaps as a high-school science project. Who knows? Perhaps it'll be you who makes the next great discovery!

Our world is full of people who have found peace, fulfillment, and friendship by suspending their own reasoning and simply accepting a single authority that seems wise and good. I've learned that they leave the movements when, and only when, they discover they have been maliciously deceived. In the meantime, nothing that I can say or do will convince such people that I am a decent human being. I no longer answer my crank mail.

This site is my hobby, and I presently have no sponsor.

This page was last updated February 6, 2006.

During the ten years my site has been online, it's proved to be one of the most popular of all internet sites for undergraduate physician and allied-health education. It is so well-known that I'm not worried about borrowers. I never refuse requests from colleagues for permission to adapt or duplicate it for their own courses... and many do. So, fellow-teachers, help yourselves. Don't sell it for a profit, don't use it for a bad purpose, and at some time in your course, mention me as author and KCUMB as my institution. Drop me a note about your successes. And special thanks to everyone who's helped and encouraged me, and especially the people at KCUMB for making it possible, and my teaching assistants over the years.

Whatever you're looking for on the web, I hope you find it, here or elsewhere. Health and friendship!

HONcode accreditation 
            seal. We comply with the HONcode standard for health trust worthy information:
verify here.

PicoSearch
  Help

More of Ed's Notes: Ed's Medical Terminology Page

Perspectives on Disease
Cell Injury and Death
Accumulations and Deposits
Inflammation
Fluids
Genes
What is Cancer?
Cancer: Causes and Effects
Immune Injury
Autoimmunity
Other Immune
HIV infections
The Anti-Immunization Activists
Infancy and Childhood
Aging
Infections
Nutrition
Environmental Lung Disease
Violence, Accidents, Poisoning
Heart
Vessels
Respiratory
Red Cells
White Cells
Coagulation
Oral Cavity
GI Tract
Liver
Pancreas (including Diabetes)
Kidney
Bladder
Men
Women
Breast
Pituitary
Thyroid
Adrenal and Thymus
Bones
Joints
Muscles
Skin
Nervous System
Eye
Ear
Autopsy
Lab Profiling
Blood Component Therapy
Serum Proteins
Renal Function Tests
Adrenal Testing
Arthritis Labs
Glucose Testing
Liver Testing
Porphyria
Urinalysis
Spinal Fluid
Lab Problem
Quackery
Alternative Medicine (current)
Alternative Medicine (1983)
Preventing "F"'s: For Teachers!
Medical Dictionary

Courtesy of CancerWEB

Learning Objectives

Describe the principal cells of the immune system, where they are found, and what we think they do. Identify CD4, CD8, CD6. Explain the CD4+/CD8+ ratio, especially as it applies to the historic test for AIDS. Identify interleukin 1, interleukin 2, tumor necrosis factor, lymphotoxin, and interferons.

Identify the five classes of antibodies, and tell what we know they do. List some helpful, some useless, and some harmful antibodies that our immune systems can make. Tell what complement is and what we know it does. Tell what a hapten is.

For each of the following, describe the essential mechanism and mention some real-life illustrations: Type I, Type II, Type III, and Type IV hypersensitivity injury.

Briefly describe each of the following:

Recognize each of the following using the microscope:

Critique the following statement, overheard at a party: "By strengthening our immune system, we prevent or cure most diseases. We strengthen our immune system by nutritional supplements and mental imagery to reduce stress."

QUIZBANK

LEARN FIRST: TYPES OF IMMUNE INJURY ("HYPERSENSITIVITY")

CELLS OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

{14252} lymphocytes
{14720} lymphocyte
{14716} lymphocyte, large (i.e., a little bit turned-on)
{14718} lymphocyte, small (i.e., resting)
{16197} lymphocyte, small
{26001} lymphocytes in sputum
{26226} lymphocyte and neutrophil
{39919} lymphocytes (there's also a nice plasma cell right at the center)

Overview of the immune system: Origins, molecular biology, basic components, with nice pictures and articles Sci. Am. Sept. 1993. Evolution of the vertebrate system: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 91: 10769, 1994. Immunity in drosophila is quite different, and is just now being unravelled.

{46429} plasma cell, electron micrograph

{08230} macrophage containing leishmania (Baghdad boil)

{09205} mast cell granules (electron micrograph)
{13733} mast cells
{14539} mast cells (purple ones) and fibroblasts
{14542} mast cell degranulating
{15117} mast cell city!
{46472} mast cell, electron micrograph, intact
{46473} mast cell, electron micrograph, degranulating

{09207} eosinophil granules
{14099} eosinophils
{14708} eosinophil

IMMUNOGLOBULINS AND COMPLEMENT should be familiar to you.

CYTOKINES

TYPE I IMMUNE INJURY IN HUMAN DISEASE (* ahh--CHOO!)

Local anaphylaxis: more often a nuisance than a real danger

{09716} urticaria
{09719} urticaria
{09720} urticaria; this is a variant with pressure-sensitive mast cells ("dermographism")
{12238} urticaria
{12240} urticaria
{25474} urticaria

{08161} atopic dermatitis ("eczema")
{12301} atopic dermatitis ("eczema"); this was probably contact dermatitis

    Worth remembering:

      Prick tests and (more sensitive, less specific, and actually dangerous) intradermal skin tests are used in making the diagnosis of type I allergy, i.e., mostly for foods, spores, dander, and pollen. These give a wheal and flare in a few minutes. RAST (radioallergosorbent testing) looks for specific IgE against particular suspected allergens, but it is hard to quantitate and harder to interpret; it is less sensitive and less specific than prick testing.

      Patch tests are used to confirm the sensitizing agents in type IV immune injury; these tend to be metals or chemicals, and the allergist will look for damage to the epidermis a few days later.

    * Future pathologists: Look for tryptase (from degranulated mast cells) in the blood of those dying suddenly. It's a marker for anaphylaxis as long as the post-mortem interval isn't excessive. Serum total IgE and allergen-specific IgE is also coming into use (Am. J. Forens. Med. Path. 25: 37, 2004).

    However, skin testing / patch testing are not altogether sensitive or specific. You will hear anecdotes of patients with "unexplained" illnesses that improved spectacularly upon withdrawal of a suspected allergen, and recur on subsequent allergen challenge. (There may or may not be evidence of type I hypersensitivity.)

      The problems with this kind of evidence are obvious. * Two that I heard about from respected physicians during my residency involved severe asthma from xerox toner, and rheumatoid arthritis caused by onions in the diet.

      For a case of rheumatoid arthritis caused by milk allergy, see Arthr. Rheum. 29: 220, 1986.

    An unknown percentage of people suffer fatigue, malaise, behavior problems, "functional" headaches, "functional" bowel syndrome, etc., etc., due to allergy. These patients typically respond well to treatment of the allergy.

      "Clinical ecology" is a term used by practitioners who propose to discover these patients. Legitimate allergists prefer the term "environmental medicine".

        * "Cytotoxic testing" for food allergy is an old, cynical health fraud: Br. Med. J. 290: 538, 1985. So is "systemic provocation-neutralization testing": NEJM 323: 429, 1990, "electrodermal diagnosis" and "the reaginic pulse test". The funniest is probably "applied kinesiology", in which the "patient" holds some substance with arm outstretched, and the "integrative practitioner" pushes more or less hard on the arm to determine whether the allergen is causing weakness, the "holistic remedy" makes the person stronger, or whatever. I am not making this up.

        * As a physician, you will learn very quickly that if you suggest that a person is likely to have/ to get a particular symptom, that person usually will develop it. "Multiple chemical sensitivities" (MCS, "idiopathic environmental intolerance") is a current pop diagnosis. People claim to be chronically ill because of various chemicals in the environment, kids who have to be in special classrooms where nobody uses cosmetics, etc., etc. People believe in this very strongly (Arch. Env. Health 57: 429, 2002), and today there are entire practices devoted to "environmental medicine" (Arch. Env. Health 56: 046, 2001) in which many of these people (adults, kids) are diagnosed. When these people are actually studied, the physiological changes for each chemical seem to take place at the odor threshold (Arch. Env. Health 57: 247, 2002), and beyond this not to vary with dosage -- exactly as you'd expect if the real cause is simply that people believe passionately that smells make them sick. Plus, they get sick off carbon dioxide (J. Allerg. 105: 358, 2000). This makes "multiple chemical sensitivities" and the associated disability one of the great iatrogenic diseases of modern times -- in this case, caused by "independent medical thought." When one group of academic researchers examined these claims and were unable to support them (Ann. Int. Med. 119: 97, 1993), the members were subjected to a horrible campaign of intimidation and legal harassment (NEJM 336: 1176, 1997.) Having dealt with quacks as long as I have, this doesn't surprise me; this can only make studying people who may really have a real disease cause by exposure to some environmental chemical impossible. As usual, the real losers are ordinary, decent people. A catalogue from one group of proponents (who dispute the psychogenic idea based on some uncontrolled independent-thought labs) lists every synthetic and petrochemical but no naturally-occurring scents (Env. Health Perspect. 105 S2: 417, 1997) -- a fact that invites an obvious conclusion. Today, it's obvious that even the "multiple chemical sensitivities" proponents are well-aware that they are on the defensive, and that the best evidence is that the illness is essentially psychogenic (Env. Health Perspect. 109: 161, 2001). A mainstream group discovers that almost everybody diagnosed with "MCS" was an abused kid: Reg. Tox. Pharm. 24: S-96, 1996 -- patients get both secondary gains and a chance to project the cause of their illness onto the chemical industry and an unsympathetic society. The group recommends a durable, caring relationship with a physician in which they can eventually figure out what's really going on, i.e., they they need to learn new living skills.

    The BIG news in type I immune injury right now is the development of a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab) that seems useful in the treatment of allergic respiratory disease (asthma, hay fever). It was approved for clinical use in 2003. See Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care. Med. 164: Supplement, Oct. 15, 2001; NEJM 348: 986, 2003. Thanks to omalizumab, there is no longer any reasonable doubt that IgE is central to the entire gamut of allergic inflammation, including the accumulation of lymphocytes and eosinophils in tissue (J. Allerg. 115: 459, 2005).

    * If you are interested in allergic disease, ask:

    • a physiologist about the subtleties of mast cell degranulation, and all the rest
    • a pharmacologist about how various drugs relieve the symptoms of allergy
    • an allergist how to test for allergy (start by taking the history, of course -- before you order a RAST; all about allergy testing for the primary care physician: Postgrad. Med. 109: 71, 2001), how to treat it, and how "desensitization" (JAMA 258: 2874, 1987; Lancet 1: 259, 1989) is supposed to work.

    • a rat about the role of serotonin in causing his or her allergy to your dandruff
    • a traditional "alternative practitioner" about why he or she is so eager to treat allergic asthma in children by regular whatever. (Answer: Because it almost always gets better by itself after a few years.)

Allergic to packed red cells
Pittsburgh Pathology Cases

TYPE II IMMUNE INJURY IN HUMAN DISEASE

    "Fixed antigens" bind antibodies. In this type of hypersensitivity, antibodies attach to antigens on the surfaces of a cell, and then something injures or destroys the cell.

      If the antibodies are already circulating and fast-acting complement-fixers, the damage may be complete within minutes.

      If the antibodies need to be made for the occasion or are slow-acting, or if an anamnestic response must take place, the injury will begin only after several days.

    What can destroy an antibody-coated cell?

      C9, at the end of the complement cascade, is cytolytic. Complement-fixing antibodies attaching to a cell are likely to wreck it.

      Cells with protruding Fc portions of IgG or coated with activated C3 bits are tasty to polys and mononuclear phagocytes.

        Medical Word Roots The coated cell was "opsonized", and "opsonin" is Greek for "relish", like on a hot dog.

      * Natural killer cells (NK-cells) and other cells with Fc receptors are supposedly able to destroy (i.e., cause apoptosis in) cells coated with IgG ("antibody-mediated cytotoxicity", supposedly important in some endocrine diseases). Of course, the dying cells undergo apoptosis.

      Better established is T-helper cell-mediated (you may see this called "IV-B" instead of II, since T-cells do the damage) cytotoxicity (Hashimoto's disease, others). Apoptosis once again, of course. See below (and consider this a combination of type II and type IV).

    Transfusion reactions:

      ABO incompatibility usually involves ready-made, complement-fixing IgM. So if your blood has anti-A and you receive a unit of A red cells, the transfused cells will be destroyed in a few minutes (and you'll be sick from all the potassium and stroma that was inside them!).

      Rh incompatibility usually involves IgG which must be induced. If you are Rh ("D") negative, the second time you encounter the Rh antigen, you may get a little sick when, beginning a few days later, the transfused red cells are slowly destroyed.

Lewis A antibody
Pittsburgh Pathology Cases

Transfusion reaction
Pittsburgh Pathology Cases

    In hemolytic disease of the newborn ("erythroblastosis fetalis"), the mother has become sensitized to one of the father's red cell antigens (usually RhD) which she does not share (probably during the birth of a previous child, with mixing of fetal-maternal blood). If the isoantibody is IgG, it can cross the placenta and wreck havoc on the fetus's red cells, causing anemia, normoblastic ("erythroblastic") hyperplasia, etc. And when the baby is born, there's no placenta to carry all the breakdown products of hemoglobin away, so the child becomes jaundiced. Review NEJM 339: 339, 1775, 1999.

      RhoGam, anti-Rh (* anti-D) antibody that is given to Rh-negative women who have delivered or lost an Rh-positive baby, prevents sensitization. This is now considered the premiere example of how to turn an immunogen into a toleragen; ask a molecular biologist the details.

    "Autoimmune" hemolytic anemias result from the body's making antibodies against its own red cell antigens (Rh-family antigens in the case of "Aldomet"-induced disease).

      The same mechanism operates in some illnesses in which neutrophil precursors are wiped out.

      Likewise, some people make antibodies against their own platelets, which are destroyed in the RE system. (The best treatment is to remove the spleen.)

      In most cases, why these antibodies develop is mysterious. Sometimes a hapten is involved (high-dose penicillin in antibody-mediated hemolytic anemia, quinidine in some cases of autoimmune thrombocytopenia.)

      In paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, the antibody against the red cells (* "Donath-Landsteiner antibody") is an IgM active only in the cold.

        A typical story is the skier who falls in the snow, then passes dark brown urine (why?) when he or she returns to the chalet.

        The commonest cause, historically, is syphilis. Why this should be is utterly mysterious.

    In Goodpasture's disease, the body makes antibodies against the basement membranes of the glomeruli and lungs. Holes get punched in the vessels, and fibrin and blood fill and ruin the nephrons and alveoli.

{00049} Goodpasture's, immunofluorescent view of antibody along glomerular basement membrane

Goodpasture's disease
Linear fluorescence
WebPath photo

    In pemphigus and its relatives, the body makes antibodies against the molecules that hold the epidermis together, and/or connect it to its basement membrane. The end result is blisters.

    Some chronic autoimmune diseases feature antibodies against the cells that are being destroyed. Whether these antibodies are pathogenic, or are the result of sensitization to proteins uncovered following damage from cell-mediated (Type IV) injury is unknown.

      These include juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus, lymphocytic (Hashimoto's) thyroiditis, autoimmune ("idiopathic") adrenocortical insufficiency, hypophysitis, parathyroiditis, Sjogren's syndrome, and others.

    Hyperacute rejection of a transplanted kidney occurs by this mechanism (see below; plus there's a component of type III injury, why?)

    We'll cover rheumatic carditis soon enough. The pathogenesis is complex.

    A variant of type II immune injury involves antibodies against neutrophils (also macrophage granules).

      Probably substances are released from damaged phagocytes that in turn damage nearby vessels and tissues. This is the underlying disease mechanism in Wegener's granulomatosis and small-vessel polyarteritis.

    We'll cover the anti-neuronal antibody syndromes throughout the course. These include:

      the paraneoplastic encephalopathies (in which the autoantigen is in a cancer, and the immune response to the tumor cross-reacts with brain or nerve), and

      Lyme disease (antibodies against the bacterium cross-react with axon);

      Sydenham's chorea, in which anti-streptococcal antibodies cause mood swings, obsessive-compulsive stuff, Tourette stuff, and funny movements (see, for example, Ped. 93: 323, 1994).

    One of the mechanisms by which uninfected T-cells are destroyed in AIDS is that debris from the dead viruses coats T-cells and causes them to be destroyed by antibodies.

    * An AIDS-like disease in mice caused by autoantibodies against your own CD4 and HLA molecules: Nat. Med. 3: 37, 1997.

    Antibody-mediated dysfunction

      These are disorders in which autoantibodies do not destroy the cells or molecules to which they bind, but cause them to malfunction.

      "Circulating anticoagulants" are antibodies against a coagulation factor (usually VIII or prothrombin activator).

        These occur in many patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (an autoimmune disease), and in many hemophiliacs to whom the factor VIII they inject is a foreign protein.

      Classic pernicious anemia is due to an auto-antibody that binds to intrinsic factor, rendering it unable to carry vitamin B12 through the ileal mucosa.

      A few cases of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus are caused by autoantibodies that tie up insulin receptors.

        (And a few such antibodies stimulate the receptors, causing "autoimmune hypoglycemia". See Lancet 1: 237 and 241, 1987.)

        Diabetics injecting insulin of animal origin hope they will not start making antibodies against the foreign protein. (If they do, they will have to switch to the recombinant human insulin, which is still more expensive.)

      In Graves' disease (which affected both Mr. & Mrs. George Bush), antibodies against hTSH receptors of the thyroid bind and stimulate the receptor. The result is marked hyperthyroidism! (Read about it in Hosp. Pract. 22(5): 147, May 15, 1987.

      The autoantigen in celiac sprue / dermatitis herpetiformis is reticulin (Lancet 338: 724, 1991). Induced by exposure to gluten in wheat, the exact way in which it causes harm is unclear.

      * Another example of such injury is the rare "stiff-person syndrome", caused by an autoantibody against glutamic acid decarboxylase, which synthesizes the neurotransmitter gamma-amino butyric acid (NEJM 318: 1012 and 1060, 1988). Similar (but not identical) is neuromyotonia ("Isaac's disease"), with immune destruction of potassium channels (Lancet 338: 75, 1991). Yet another involves blocking antibodies to factors necessary for the growth of various blood cells (NEJM 321: 97, 1989). Stay tuned. Chronic urticaria often results from autoantibodies against the IgE receptor on mast cells (NEJM 328: 1599, 1993). Aplastic anemia from autoantibodies against erythropoietin (as, after treatment with the recombinant drug): NEJM 346: 469, 2002; Lancet 363: 1768, 2004.

TYPE III IMMUNE INJURY IN HUMAN DISEASE

Lupus kidney
Antibodies deposited in glomerulus
Urbana Atlas of Pathology

    "Soluble antigens" precipitate with antibodies. Usually this happens 2-4 hours after exposure. This sort of tissue injury is mediated by antigen-antibody complexes ("immune complexes")

      If there is a great excess of either antigen or of antibody, mixtures of the two are readily soluble and easily disposed of by the body (why?).

      The problem occurs when antigen and antibody are present in just the right (wrong?) proportion. They form huge lattices ("complexes").

      The complexes get deposited around the body, typically in the walls of blood vessels (which are nearby), the glomerulus (where proteins are concentrated), the skin (where it's cold and things precipitate sooner), and the synovium (nobody knows why). Complement is fixed, vessels leak and spazz shut, polys and monos arrive and find nothing to attack (but attack anyway), C9 punches holes in healthy membranes, and general havoc results.

        * "Platelet involvement" in all of this might reasonably be explained by injury to the endothelium.

      The process takes at least several hours to develop following exposure to the antigen (even if the antibody is already present), but it can last for years.

      * Patients with diseases thought to be caused by immune-complexes often (but not always) show diminished ability of macrophages to devour such complexes. This is highly speculative, linked to HLA-B8, DR3, etc., etc.

    The model for localized immune-complex mediated tissue injury is the Arthus reaction, in which the immune complexes form "in situ".

      This accounts for some of the discomfort that develops several hours after an injection for immunization. The whole-body counterpart is the horrible "serum sickness" following passive immunization with horse serum. See below.

      In "membranous glomerulopathy", antibodies complex with an antigen that is distributed at regular intervals along the glomerular basement membrane. The immune complexes appear as a regular series of bumps (and make the GBM look thick, hence the name).

    When many or all vessels are involved with a severe type III hypersensitivity reaction, the classic description is "serum sickness". (This term comes from the days when horse serum was administered by vein for passive immunization, and people made anti-horse antibodies).

      "Polyarteritis nodosa" is a serious disease sometimes due to type III hypersensitivity. In around half of cases, the antigen is hepatitis B virus. Wait for changing definitions, and remember that even your ordinary hepatitis B and hepatitis C patients can get a vasculitis in the acute phase.

      Rheumatoid factor is IgM antibodies again the Fc portion of IgG. These tend to precipitate in the walls of vessels, producing a vasculitis.

      Erythema nodosum is patches (vicious cycle) of vasculitis in the subcutaneous fat, typically on the cool shins. It produces typical red bumps. It's often secondary to some other disease or medicine, but can be "idiopathic".

    In other conditions, circulating immune complexes deposit in various tissues, and they are what gets injured.

      During acute infectious illnesses, we have all experienced several hours of joint aches. This is probably due to immune-complex deposition (antibody plus bound infectious agent) in our synovial membranes, with resulting edema and stretching of the joint capsules.

      In the organic pneumoconioses ("farmer's lung", etc., diseases of the lungs due to inhalation of organic dusts, ranging from mold spores to pigeon droppings), the problem is a pulmonary vasculitis due to type III hypersensitivity.

      In systemic lupus erythematosus, the patient makes antibodies against many of her own tissue proteins and nucleic acids. Antigen-antibody ("immune") complexes are deposited in the glomeruli, pleura, pericardium, synovium, skin, and elsewhere.

      In drug reactions, systemic infections, carcinomatosis, etc., etc., "hypersensitivity angiitis" of small arteries and small veins results from type III immune injury. The antigen is a drug, a micro-organism, a component of tissue debris, etc., etc. -- i.e., you might not ever identify it. This is not an uncommon problem in clinical medicine. A near-synonym is "leukocytoclastic vasculitis", because of all the broken-down neutrophils seen in the vessel walls.

      In AIDS and in several other viral illnesses, immune complexes of antibody-plus-virus adsorb onto platelets. This results in their rapid destruction.

    Vasculitis syndromes in autoimmune disease: Br. J. Rheum. 27: 251, 1998.

    * Surprisingly, nobody's written anything on allergy shots as possible causes of vasculitis for many years. It'd make sense... but if it happens, we're not hearing about it.

TYPE IV IMMUNE INJURY IN HUMAN DISEASE

    In type IV hypersensitivity, special T-helper cells (TD) programmed to recognize a particular "altered self" antigen, are stimulated. They in turn coordinate other lymphocytes, macrophages, and other tissue elements. The object is to destroy every cell bearing the "altered self" antigen.

      This is great for ridding the body of virally infected cells, cells harboring intracellular parasites (TB, some fungi), and perhaps tumor cells.

      It is also the way the body acute-rejects transplanted organs (allografts).

    The TD-cell programmed to respond to a particular antigen meets it in association with the class II histocompatibility antigens (MHC-II, HLA-D, DR; "Ia's") of the dendritic macrophage that presents it. This is a big deal.

      The stimulated TD cell signals to other T-cells and macrophages, telling them that it is time for a type IV hypersensitivity reaction.

      All nearby resting T-CTL cells of all specificities are readied, and macrophages in the area are stimulated ("become angry").

      In addition, the TD cell produces interferon (helps anger the macrophages) and probably other factors. (You will have to read about transfer factor yourself).

    The now-stimulated T-CTL cell specialized for killing cells bearing a particular antigen will attack when it encounters that antigen in association with the class I histocompatibility antigens (HLA-A, B, C).

      The T-CTL binds to the cell bearing the "altered self" antigen, and then may leave. A few hours later, the cell bearing the "altered self" antigen bursts/undergoes apoptosis and dies. Unlike in complement-mediated woes, "innocent bystanders" are spared. When this predominates, we talk about "cell-mediated cytotoxicity"; some authorities call this "type V immune injury".

      The molecular biology is now worked being worked out. A T-cell "kisses" the cell to be destroyed on the fas antigen (J. Imm. 152: 1127, 1994), the common apoptosis trigger.

    The angry macrophage has increased free radicals (including "superoxide"), more proteases, and greater phagocytic ability. It even eats non-angered macrophages in which micro-organisms might be growing.

      Angry macrophages are the ones that become epithelioid cells.

      Angry macrophages, unlike T-cells, aren't very smart and will eat whatever they can. This often includes some of the surrounding healthy tissue.

    "Cell-mediated immunity" is misleading today. It means that the sensitized and stimulated T-cell that orchestrates the reaction can do it again when transferred alone to a non-sensitized host.

      "Delayed type hypersensitivity" is another archaic term, from the days when only type I and type IV hypersensitivity were known.

      In any case, the reaction always takes a day or so to develop.

    The model for type IV hypersensitivity is the tuberculin skin test.

      A trace of extract from the TB microbe is injected into the dermis.

      If TD cells specialized against TB microbes are abundant (i.e., the patient has previously met the TB microbe), a brisk type IV hypersensitivity reaction will take place. Since macrophages dominate, innocent bystanders will be hurt. A lump of angry macrophages and fibrin will be palpable beneath the skin 48-72 hours later.

        (If you know the person has had TB, don't do the test, or the angry macrophages will probably eat a hole in the skin at the injection site.)

    Lack of effective TD function occurs in some diseases (remember especially AIDS, sarcoidosis, acute measles, and any disease that causes serious wasting) and is called "anergy".

      The molecular biology is only starting to be unravelled (Nat. Med. 6: 290, 2000).

      To test for anergy, do intradermal skin tests using substances most everyone has once mounted a type IV hypersensitivity reaction against (i.e., athlete's foot, candida yeast infection, mumps, tetanus toxoid). If there are no lumps, the patient has "anergy".

    Type IV hypersensitivity is familiar to anyone who has ever had poison ivy, a rash from a nickel watch band, or a rash from * neomycin ointment. (All are haptens; suspect a hapten as at least part of the problem in any case of contact dermatitis.)

{24955} dermatologist skin test; the guy was allergic to the ramrod (no, I don't know how it happened or what it was made of)

      Exposure to beryllium dust often excites an intense granulomatous reaction, due to the ability of TD cells to recognize it.

    Cell-mediated immunity also accounts for the inflammation of the skin in the viral exanthems. (* The newest of these is the rash caused by AIDS virus.)

      In viral hepatitis, the viruses may not really do the liver cells any harm, but they express their antigens on the liver cell membranes. This upsets certain programmed TD cells, and soon cell-mediated immunity is destroying the patient's own liver.

    As noted above, type IV hypersensitivity may play a role in some autoimmune disorders.

      Confusingly, most of these also feature antibodies against the tissue that is being attacked. Unlike in classic type IV ("no antibodies") immune injury, the antibodies may be required for the injury to proceed ("antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity", "IV-B", thought to be important in Hashimoto's autoimmune thyroiditis: NEJM 325: 238, 1991.)

      * Or the antibodies might just be made in response to the release of damaged antigens following type IV immune injury.

    During the 1990's, it became clear that most cases of aplastic anemia (i.e., failure of all three principal cell types in the bone marrow) result from T-cell mediated injury.

    Spontaneous regression of pigmented nevi ("halo nevi") and malignant melanomas is attributed to type IV hypersensitivity.

    Type IV immune injury to trophoblast, apparently a cause of chronic miscarriage (JAMA 273: 1933, 1995).

TRANSPLANT REJECTION

Transplant Immunology
Great site
Transplant Pathology Internet Services

Renal allograft rejection
Pittsburgh Pathology Cases

Acute transplant rejection
Vessel changes
KU Collection

    This is too complicated to discuss at the end of this lecture, and fairly esoteric. Worth remembering:

    T-cells do most of the rejecting most of the time. The most antigenic cells of the graft are the lymphocytes and donor macrophages.

    Hyperacute rejection happens when the patient gets a allograft and already has antibodies against it (oops!). There is a visible pattern of type III immune injury; type II has also occurred.

    Acute rejection is mediated by T-cells ("acute cellular rejection") and is basically done by cell-mediated immunity. Look for lymphocytes in the parenchyma. There may also be damage from antibodies and antigen-antibody complexes ("acute humoral rejection"), which shows as a vasculitis with intimal edema and inflammation (lymphocytes, foam cells). Clinicians say, "He's rejecting his kidney (or whatever organ)", even if it is suddenly happening years after the transplant.

Acute rejection
Kidney
WebPath photo

Acute rejection
Kidney
WebPath photo

Acute rejection
Antigen-antibody complexes
WebPath photo

Acute rejection
Heart
WebPath photo

Acute rejection
Immune complexes
WebPath photo

Acute rejection
T-cells
WebPath photo

      Chronic rejection is still rather mysterious, and is usual in old allografts. Mostly you will see fibrosis of the organ and dense fibrous narrowing of the arterial lumens.

Chronic rejection
Kidney
WebPath photo

Chronic rejection
Kidney
WebPath photo

    * The baboon liver xenograft: Lancet 341: 531 & 536, 1993. Do you think this was ethical or unethical?

GRAFT VS. HOST DISEASE ("GVH")

    When bone marrow or some other organ containing T-cells is transplanted into an immune-disabled patient, T-cells in the graft attack the "foreign" histo-compatibility antigens of the recipient.

      Natural killer (NK) cells may be responsible in humans, and lymphocytes are observed attached to epithelial cells.

    Acute graft vs. host disease may occur 20-100 days following a transplant, even if HLA antigens appear identical.

      It involves primarily the skin (dermatitis), intestine (diarrhea, malabsorption), and liver (biliary epithelium -- jaundice, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, portal fibrosis).

{12006} graft vs. host, skin lesions
{12007} graft vs. host, skin lesions

Graft vs. Host in the lung
Lung pathology series; follow the arrows
Dr. Warnock's Collection

Graft vs. host disease
Trust me; dead and dying cells
KU Collection

Graft vs. host disease
Trust me
KU Collection

Graft vs. host
Jaundice and rash
WebPath photo

Graft vs. host
Cloudy swelling and apoptosis
WebPath photo

Graft vs. host
Biliary scarring and obstruction
WebPath photo

Graft vs. host
Biliary scarring and obstruction
WebPath photo

      In each organ, there is apoptosis of epithelial cells with only a scanty lymphocytic infiltrate, and fibrosis in the lamina propria.

    Chronic graft vs. host disease occurs after 100 days and is characterized by more widespread involvement of epithelial surfaces and a more dense chronic inflammatory infiltrate. A scleroderma-like syndrome can develop.

FINAL NOTES:

    We have mentioned a number of interesting diseases during this unit. You will have plenty of time to learn about them. For now, understand the big concepts.

    Folk wisdom that "the mind affects the immune system" finds support from studies of the effects of substances P and K (neuropeptides) on immune cells -- both stimulate production of interleukin 1, interleukin 6, TNF, interferon beta-two (Science 241: several papers, 1988).

    There are many experimental models in which psychological stress appears to promote the development of certain diseases. At the same time, there are almost as many other experimental models in which psychological stress prevents certain diseases. (I can supply both kinds of references if you're interested. There's a lot of interest right now in sympathetic overactivation -- super-stress, brain injury, "sympathetic storm" -- and the subsequent release of interleukin-10 from monocytes -- which can be blocked by propranolol. Nat Med. June 1998.)

    There is much we do not know about the relationship of the immune system and disease. Speculating is fine, but be skeptical about grandiose claims. Today, most proponents of unscientific remedies claim whatever they do "strengthens the immune system" -- but they refuse to present data from controlled studies. ("We will never treat 'whole persons' as statistics!") We look with hope on the few "alternative practitioners" who are beginning to study their own methods fairly and honestly.

    * Insects use lectins instead of antibodies; they have no B or T-cells, but they reject tissue transplants, nobody knows how.

* Sir Winston Churchill, in hospital with an infection during World War II, looked at his hospital chart and asked his physician, "What are these lymphocytes?" He was told: "We don't know, Prime Minster." "Then why do you count them?" Churchill retorted. Retold in Nature 333: 804, 1988.

        Now I lay me down to study
        I pray the Lord I won't go nutty;
        And if I fail to learn this junk
        I pray the Lord that I won't flunk.
        But if I do, don't pity me at all
        Just lay my bones in the study hall;
        Tell my teacher I did my best
        Then pile my books upon my chest.
        Now I lay me down to rest,
        I pray I'll pass tomorrow's test.
        If I should die before I wake
        That's one less test I'll have to take.

                -- Author unknown!

Visitors to www.pathguy.com
reset Jan. 30, 2005:

Ed at homeDrop by and meet Ed

Ed says, "This world would be a sorry place if people like me who call ourselves Christians didn't try to act as good as other good people ." Prayer Request

Teaching Pathology

Pathological Chess


Taser Video
83.4 MB
7:26 min