PERSPECTIVES ON DISEASE
Ed Friedlander, M.D., Pathologist
scalpel_blade@yahoo.com

Cyberfriends: The help you're looking for is probably here.

Welcome to Ed's Pathology Notes, placed here originally for the convenience of medical students at my school. You need to check the accuracy of any information, from any source, against other credible sources. I cannot diagnose or treat over the web, I cannot comment on the health care you have already received, and these notes cannot substitute for your own doctor's care. I am good at helping people find resources and answers. If you need me, send me an E-mail at scalpel_blade@yahoo.com Your confidentiality is completely respected.

DoctorGeorge.com is a larger, full-time service. There is also a fee site at myphysicians.com, and another at www.afraidtoask.com.

Translate this page automatically

Freely have you received, give freely With one of four large boxes of "Pathguy" replies.

I'm still doing my best to answer everybody. Sometimes I get backlogged, sometimes my E-mail crashes, and sometimes my literature search software crashes. If you've not heard from me in a week, post me again. I send my most challenging questions to the medical student pathology interest group, minus the name, but with your E-mail where you can receive a reply.

Numbers in {curly braces} are from the magnificent Slice of Life videodisk. No medical student should be without access to this wonderful resource. Someday you may be able to access these pictures directly from this page.

I am presently adding clickable links to images in these notes. Let me know about good online sources in addition to these:

Freely have you received, freely give. -- Matthew 10:8. My site receives an enormous amount of traffic, and I'm handling about 200 requests for information weekly, all as a public service.

Pathology's modern founder, Rudolf Virchow M.D., left a legacy of realism and social conscience for the discipline. I am a mainstream Christian, a man of science, and a proponent of common sense and common kindness. I am an outspoken enemy of all the make-believe and bunk that interfere with peoples' health, reasonable freedom, and happiness. I talk and write straight, and without apology.

Throughout these notes, I am speaking only for myself, and not for any employer, organization, or associate.

Special thanks to my friend and colleague, Charles Wheeler M.D., pathologist and former Kansas City mayor. Thanks also to the real Patch Adams M.D., who wrote me encouragement when we were both beginning our unusual medical careers.

If you're a private individual who's enjoyed this site, and want to say, "Thank you, Ed!", then what I'd like best is a contribution to the Episcopalian home for abandoned, neglected, and abused kids in Nevada:

I've spent time there and they are good. Write "Thanks Ed" on your check.

Help me help others

My home page
More of my notes
My medical students

Especially if you're looking for information on a disease with a name that you know, here are a couple of great places for you to go right now and use Medline, which will allow you to find every relevant current scientific publication. You owe it to yourself to learn to use this invaluable internet resource. Not only will you find some information immediately, but you'll have references to journal articles that you can obtain by interlibrary loan, plus the names of the world's foremost experts and their institutions.

Alternative (complementary) medicine has made real progress since my generally-unfavorable 1983 review linked below. If you are interested in complementary medicine, then I would urge you to visit my new Alternative Medicine page. If you are looking for something on complementary medicine, please go first to the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians. And for your enjoyment... here are some of my old pathology exams for medical school undergraduates.

I cannot examine every claim that my correspondents share with me. Sometimes the independent thinkers prove to be correct, and paradigms shift as a result. You also know that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. When a discovery proves to square with the observable world, scientists make reputations by confirming it, and corporations are soon making profits from it. When a decades-old claim by a "persecuted genius" finds no acceptance from mainstream science, it probably failed some basic experimental tests designed to eliminate self-deception. If you ask me about something like this, I will simply invite you to do some tests yourself, perhaps as a high-school science project. Who knows? Perhaps it'll be you who makes the next great discovery!

Our world is full of people who have found peace, fulfillment, and friendship by suspending their own reasoning and simply accepting a single authority that seems wise and good. I've learned that they leave the movements when, and only when, they discover they have been maliciously deceived. In the meantime, nothing that I can say or do will convince such people that I am a decent human being. I no longer answer my crank mail.

This site is my hobby, and I presently have no sponsor.

This page was last updated February 6, 2006.

During the ten years my site has been online, it's proved to be one of the most popular of all internet sites for undergraduate physician and allied-health education. It is so well-known that I'm not worried about borrowers. I never refuse requests from colleagues for permission to adapt or duplicate it for their own courses... and many do. So, fellow-teachers, help yourselves. Don't sell it for a profit, don't use it for a bad purpose, and at some time in your course, mention me as author and KCUMB as my institution. Drop me a note about your successes. And special thanks to everyone who's helped and encouraged me, and especially the people at KCUMB for making it possible, and my teaching assistants over the years.

Whatever you're looking for on the web, I hope you find it, here or elsewhere. Health and friendship!

HONcode accreditation 
            seal. We comply with the HONcode standard for health trust worthy information:
verify here.

PicoSearch
  Help

More of Ed's Notes: Ed's Medical Terminology Page

Perspectives on Disease
Cell Injury and Death
Accumulations and Deposits
Inflammation
Fluids
Genes
What is Cancer?
Cancer: Causes and Effects
Immune Injury
Autoimmunity
Other Immune
HIV infections
The Anti-Immunization Activists
Infancy and Childhood
Aging
Infections
Nutrition
Environmental Lung Disease
Violence, Accidents, Poisoning
Heart
Vessels
Respiratory
Red Cells
White Cells
Coagulation
Oral Cavity
GI Tract
Liver
Pancreas (including Diabetes)
Kidney
Bladder
Men
Women
Breast
Pituitary
Thyroid
Adrenal and Thymus
Bones
Joints
Muscles
Skin
Nervous System
Eye
Ear
Autopsy
Lab Profiling
Blood Component Therapy
Serum Proteins
Renal Function Tests
Adrenal Testing
Arthritis Labs
Glucose Testing
Liver Testing
Porphyria
Urinalysis
Spinal Fluid
Lab Problem
Quackery
Alternative Medicine (current)
Alternative Medicine (1983)
Preventing "F"'s: For Teachers!
Medical Dictionary

Courtesy of CancerWEB

General Pathology
Virginia Commonwealth U.
Great pictures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Course Introduction and First Hour

Outline the scope of the introductory course in pathology and clinical pathology. Describe the announced criteria for passing, and the factors that will be considered in any narrative performance summary. Give the title or nickname of the course text or the last name of its first author.

Describe the scope of pathology as a discipline. Distinguish general, systemic, anatomic, and clinical pathology. Mention at least three things a pathologist does when he or she is not teaching medical students! Tell how to contact your pathology instructors.

Identify Rudolf Virchow as the founder of modern pathology. Explain briefly the idea that pathology deals with human beings from the molecular to the social levels, and mention at least one health problem "caused by politicians".

Explain why we call our approach to pathology "scientific", and why we believe that we are telling you the truth. Distinguish various levels of scientific statements ("theory", "hypothesis", etc.) Answer common criticisms of pathology education made by non-physicians. Mention and justify at least one criterion for evaluating a media health claim.

Define iatrogenic disease, mention the extent of the problem, give at least two examples, and explain why some iatrogenic disease is acceptable. Comment on the application of Hippocrates' dictum, "First Do No Harm" to today's medical practice.

Mention how we screen for color-blindness, and tell what a color-blind student should do in lab.

INTRODUCTION

Where there is love of medicine, there is love of humankind.

      -- Hippocrates

Test all things; hold fast to what is good.

      -- Paul (I Th 5:12)

    Pathology is the scientific study of disease. Disease could reasonably be defined as internal problems that cause pain and/or interfere with a person's ability to work, play, and/or love others.

      Injuries (mechanical, chemical, electrical, or thermal), poisonings, and bad habits may or may not be included in someone's definition of disease.

      The social pathology that leads to disease is often listed among a patient's problems. Dr. Virchow, the founder of modern pathology, considered it a principal mechanism of disease, though it falls outside the domains of anatomic and clinical pathology.

      There are several thousand distinguishable diseases. Generally, we will not tell you in this course about diseases that affect fewer than 1 in 20,000 people during their lifetimes.

    Doctors talk about disease and other human tragedy without showing obvious emotion. We are sometimes asked how we can do this. Knowing the truth about our problems is essential before we can do much about them.

INEVITABLE, SERIOUS DISEASES: Everyone who lives long enough will probably get:

    Atherosclerosis: an accumulation of cholesterol and debris in cells of the intimal layer of the large arteries, eventually ruining the artery. Some atherosclerosis is inevitable.

    Alzheimer's changes: the anatomic lesions of Alzheimer's appear in the brains of most, probably all, elderly people. Symptomatic Alzheimer's may or may not be inevitable.

    Osteoarthritis: irreversible wear-and-tear and age-related changes in joints.

    Osteoporosis: irreversible loss of the substance of bones

    Senile macular degeneration: Central blindness due to old age

    Senile cataract: Opacification of the lens due to old age

OUR VERY COMMON, SERIOUS DISEASES

    Atherosclerosis remains our most ubiquitous health problem. It kills a majority of US citizens. The epidemic peaked in 1968, and atherosclerosis will soon be second to cancer as a killer of Americans.

      Atherosclerosis begins during the first year of life.

      Severe atherosclerosis causes transient ischemic attacks, strokes, angina pectoris, heart attacks, ruptured aortic aneurysms, leg claudication, bowel ischemia, kidney destruction (by "atheroembolization") and gangrene of the legs.

      Whether atherosclerotic plaques in humans can be made to go away is a subject of debate today. In the animal models, it is largely reversible. I predict that during the next few years, cardiologists will focus on "vulnerable plaque" (i.e., the lipid-rich areas that actually cause most of the trouble) and discover that it often shrivels to nothing when coronary risk factors are eliminated.

    Cancers ("malignant neoplasms") are groups of cells that grow as if they were a new organ, invade and destroy normal tissue, and spread to remote sites by the bloodstream or lymph vessels.

      These develop in approximately 35% of US citizens (1,334,100 new cases this year, 556,500 deaths).

        The higher incidence in men is mostly explained by more incidental prostate cancers. The higher mortality in men is mostly explained by men having been smoking longer.

      The commonest cancers in male humans (#'s: 2003)

        (1) Prostate cancers (220,900 new cases this year; 28,900 deaths; lung cancer used to be more common,and plus prostate cancer is being diagnosed much sooner)

        (2) Lung cancers (91,800 new cases this year; total rate is declining!; 88,400 deaths, obviously as lethal as ever)

        (3) Colon-rectum cancers (72,800 new cases this year, 28,500 deaths)

        (4) Bladder cancers (42,200 new cases this year; 8600 deaths)

        (5) Lymphomas and myeloma (40,100 new cases this year; 17,500 deaths)

        (6) Melanomas (29,900 new cases this year; 4700 deaths)

        (7) # Kidney cancers (19,500 new cases this year; 7400 deaths)

        (8) Oropharynx cancers (18,200 new cases this year, 4800 deaths, going down)

        (9) # Leukemias (17,900 new cases this year; 12,100 deaths)

        (10) Pancreas cancers (14,900 new cases this year; 14,700 deaths; very lethal cancer);

        (11) Stomach cancers (13,400 new cases this year; 7000 deaths)

        (12) Liver and biliary cancers (14,800 new cases this year; 10,500 deaths)

        (13) Esophagus cancers (10,600 new cases this year; 9900 deaths; very lethal cancer)

        (14) # CNS cancers (10,200 new cases this year; 7300 deaths)

        (15) Larynx cancers (7100 new cases this year, thankfully declining; 3000 deaths)

      The commonest cancers in female humans:

        (1) Breast cancers (211,300 new cases this year; 39,800 deaths; the rate probably is stable, while the death rate is declining significantly)

        (2) Lung cancers (80,100 new cases this year, will soon catch up with the men; 68,800 deaths, making it the #1 cancer killer of women by a solid margin)

        (3) Colon-rectum cancers (74,700 new cases this year; 28,800 deaths)

        (4) Endometrium cancers (40,100 new cases this year; 6800 deaths)

        (5) Lymphomas and myelomas (35,500 new cases this year; 17,360 deaths)

        (6) Ovary cancers (25,400 new cases this year; 14,300 deaths)

        (7) Melanomas (24,300 new cases this year; 2900 deaths)

        (8) Bladder cancers (15,200 new cases this year; 3900 deaths)

        (9) Pancreas cancers (15,800 new cases this year; 15,300 deaths; very lethal cancer)

        (10) Thyroid cancers (16,300 new cases this year; 800 deaths)

        (11) # Leukemias (12,700 new cases this year; 9800 deaths)

        (12) Uterine cervix cancers (12,200 new cases this year, 4100 deaths; despite low U.S. rates, this is the great cancer killer of young women worldwide)

        (13) # Kidney cancers (12,400 new cases this year; 4500 deaths)

        (14) Oropharynx cancers (9500 new cases this year; 2400 deaths)

        (15) Stomach cancers (9000 new cases this year; 5100 deaths)

        (16) # CNS cancers (8100 new cases this year; 5800 deaths)

      "#" designates categories that contain a large number of pediatric patients.

      NOTE: Small skin cancers that are easily cured are not included. These categories include cancers of all degrees of aggressiveness that arise in a particular organ. For example, the common lung cancers are still nearly 100% fatal, but some cancers that arise in the lungs are slow-growing, and intercurrent disease can kill these patients.

    High blood pressure ("hypertension") means increased systemic systolic and/or diastolic pressure.

      High blood pressure eventually affects 15% of US citizens. The causes may be apparent but are usually mysterious.

      Complications of most forms of high blood pressure include accelerated atherosclerosis, strokes, heart pump failure, brain malfunction, and kidney damage.

      Not everyone with occasional elevated blood pressure readings is sick. The significance of such "labile hypertension" remains unclear.

    Emphysema (loss of the elasticity in the lung air spaces) and chronic bronchitis (longstanding inflammation of the larger airways) are very troublesome.

      These are very common, and are to be expected in cigaret smokers and those who must breathe polluted air.

    Diabetes mellitus means lack of insulin or resistance to its actions.

      Maybe 5% of US citizens eventually get some form of diabetes. Today, its most serious consequences are damage to the arteries, arterioles, eyes, kidneys, and nerves.

    Bacterial pneumonias are infections within the alveoli of the lungs.

      These often affect people with underlying physical problems. Bacterial pneumonia is a common mechanism of death in these people.

    Aspiration pneumonias result from getting something bad (especially stomach contents) into the airways.

      This is a very common mechanism of death in people with underlying physical or substance-abuse problems.

      Actually most bacterial pneumonias are the results of aspiration of micro-organisms from the mouth.

    Tuberculosis: a special bacterial pneumonia that was once a major killer of healthy young people.

      TB infection is still common, but serious disease is controllable.

    Deep vein thrombosis: a blood clot in the deep veins, usually of a leg.

      This is a minor problem by itself, but if the clot breaks off, it can cause sudden death by traveling to the pulmonary arterial tree. When this happens, it is called a pulmonary thromboembolus ("blood clot in the lung").

    Child abuse and neglect

      This has always been widespread, but it has only recently been recognized as important. Although it is reported much more often today, I know of no reason to believe that its prevalence in the US is increasing.

    Psychoneuroses

      Anxiety, depression, agoraphobia, panic attacks, and related phenomena that appear to result (at least in part) from one's experiences rather than from well-defined organic changes. The basic ability to test reality is preserved.

      Somewhere between 10% and 70% of US citizens are impaired by psychoneuroses on any given day.

      Emotional overlay ("the supratentorial component") is important in most serious illness.

    Alcoholism: loss of self-control in drinking ethyl alcohol.

      Around 10% of US citizens ultimately become alcoholics. This is harmful to them and to their families, employers, and other associates.

      If you feel a compulsion to drink, or cannot stop after one drink, then you must stop for the rest of your life. If you don't care about yourself, then at least do this for the sake of those around you.

      Around one US citizen in three presently has a serious personal problem because of an alcoholic.

    Nicotine addiction

      This is the principal risk factor for:

        lung cancer
        emphysema/chronic bronchitis
        Buerger's thromboangiitis obliterans (only rare one on the list)

      Combined with alcoholism, it is the principal risk factor for:

        mouth and throat cancer
        esophageal cancer
        larynx cancer

      It is an important risk factor for:

        atherosclerosis/sudden cardiac death
        bladder cancer
        gum disease
        kidney cancer
        pancreas cancer
        upset stomach and peptic ulcer
        household fires

      Today, most new nicotine addicts are adolescents. Cigaret smoking, once macho, is now a teenaged girl's vice.

      NOTE: Human beings are selectively fearful. Consider smokers who won't try a single parachute jump "because you can get killed"....

    Osteoporosis

      This disables many older people, especially older women. It can produce chronic pain, collapsed vertebral bodies, fractured hips, etc., etc.

    Osteoarthritis

      This causes pain and interferes with movement.

    Alzheimer's disease

      This eventually results in profound loss of mental function.

      Alzheimer's disease includes "senility". Around 15% of US citizens have it when they die.

    HIV virus infection (AIDS virus infection)

    Iatrogenic disease

OUR VERY COMMON, USUALLY LESS SERIOUS DISEASES (NON-DISEASES, ETC.):

    Each of these affects 5% or more of US citizens at risk sometime during their lives. Some can be fatal, others are only trivial.

    Bacterial diseases

      boils
      cellulitis
      strep throats
      bacterial conjunctivitis
      bacterial ear infections
      impetigo
      food poisoning (especially staphylococcal)
      bacterial diarrheas ("Montezuma's revenge", etc.)
      gonorrhea (one million cases yearly; 300,000 hospitalizations)

    Viral, chlamydial, and mycoplasmal diseases

      viral upper respiratory infections
      viral and mycoplasmal chest colds
      viral and chlamydial conjunctivitis
      viral and mycoplasmal ear infections
      viral gastroenteritis
      infectious mononucleosis
      herpes zoster infections (chickenpox, shingles)
      herpes simplex I (lip) and II (genitals)
      cytomegalic inclusion disease (cytomegalovirus infection)
      chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis

    Fungal, protozoal, and parasitic diseases

      tinea ("athlete's foot", "crotch rot", "ringworm", etc.)
      fungal infections of the nails
      "subclinical" histoplasmosis
      "subclinical" toxoplasmosis
      lice ("pediculosis")

    Men's stuff

      adolescent gynecomastia
      knee injuries
      varicoceles
      sports injuries
      inguinal hernias
      impotence
      premature ejaculation
      male pattern baldness (bothers some men, doesn't bother others, some men like it)
      homosexuality

        As always, this is extremely politicized; right or wrong, "ego-dystonic" gay men are not the only people nowadays who seek to become more comfortable with a range of sexual expressions


      transvestism ("cross-dressing")

        Again, hard to justify as a "disease" though some men may wish to be rid of the compulsion


      benign prostatic enlargement
      microscopic cancers of the prostate

    Women's stuff

      fibrocystic diseases of the breast
      menstrual iron deficiency anemia
      frigidity
      menstrual cramps
      vaginal infections (candida, trichomonas, gardnerella)
      bacterial urinary bladder and kidney infections
      atypias of the cervical epithelium
      leiomyomas ("fibroids") of the uterus
      endometriosis
      vomiting of pregnancy
      pre-eclampsia
      miscarriages
      cystoceles
      menopausal hot flashes
      kraurosis of the vulva
      idiopathic hirsutism

    Skin diseases

      acne
      atopic dermatitis ("eczema")
      seborrheic dermatitis (dandruff, "oily skin", etc.)
      contact dermatitis
      drug rashes
      miliaria ("prickly heat", "jungle rot", etc.)
      warts
      seborrheic keratoses
      tinea versicolor and ringworm
      capillary hemangiomas
      dermatofibromas
      pigmented nevi ("moles")
      lentigos ("moles", "liver spots", etc.)
      epidermoid inclusion cysts ("sebaceous cysts")
      sun-damaged skin
      actinic keratoses

    Circulatory system

      floppy mitral valve ("Barlow's syndrome")
      patent foramen ovale (usually a trivial autopsy finding)
      varicose veins

    Digestive diseases

      dental caries ("cavities")
      gum disease
      aphthous stomatitis ("canker sores")
      reflux peptic esophagitis
      hiatus hernias
      peptic ulcers of stomach and duodenum
      diverticular disease of the colon
      functional bowel disease ("spastic colon")
      hemorrhoid problems
      Gilbert's "disease" (problems conjugating bilirubin)
      gallstones

    Allergic diseases

      food allergies (milk, eggs, peanuts, sesame, wheat, fish, shellfish, etc.)
      respiratory allergies ("hay fever", asthma)
      poison ivy

    Above the neck

      functional headaches (muscle spasm, migraine, cluster)
      refractive errors, astigmatism
      presbyopia
      cataracts
      conjunctivitis
      impacted earwax
      otitis externa
      presbycusis
      serous otitis
      otosclerosis
      mild perceptual and learning problems

    Musculoskeletal problems

      low back pain
      bursitis
      tendinitis
      sprains
      fractures
      ingrown toenails
      bunions

    Nutritional problems

      obesity
      "subclinical" folic acid deficiency (major problem, long-neglected)
      iron deficiency
      "subclinical" iron overload
      (??) "functional hypoglycemia" ("idiopathic post-prandial syndrome")
      (??) "subclinical" zinc deficiency

    Burns

    Despite all this, today's North Americans and Northern Europeans (no, not the Himalayan Hunza people; that's a cynical lie) are the healthiest people ever.

WORLD HEALTH

    All the diseases listed so far are common all over the world.

    Other diseases are very prevalent in some or all of the developing nations.

      These are primarily political and economic problems rather than scientific mysteries.

    Very common, could be controlled

    • Keratomalacia (blindness from vitamin A deficiency)

    • Malaria (might be the most prevalent serious disease worldwide)

    • Measles (about 700,000 deaths worldwide each year, almost entirely in countries where they do not immunize: Int. J. Inf. Dis. 4: 14, 2000)

    • Whooping cough (kills hundreds of thousands of children yearly: Ped. Inf. Dis. J. 16(4S):S85-9, 1997)

    • Diarrhea (kills >10,000 babies daily; NEJM 325: 327, 1991)

    • Diphtheria

    • Neonatal tetanus (still a terrible problem: Bulletin of WHO 76: 161, 1998; there are an estimated 277,000 deaths worldwide each year)

    • Trachoma

    • Yaws

    Very common, less controllable:

    • Tuberculosis

    • Respiratory infections

    • Schistosomiasis

    • Hookworm

    • Typhoid

    • Dengue

    • Malnutrition (around 35 million people die of malnutrition yearly)

    Very common, less morbidity:

    • Polio (thankfully disappearing)

    • Hepatitis (A and B)

    • Leprosy

    The governments of certain "developing" nations actively oppose efforts to control infectious diseases among their poor. They know that these diseases are important in limiting population growth.

    During the last few years, the standing of the World Health Organization, a major branch of the United Nations, has deteriorated greatly in the eyes of the medical world. I think a lot of this criticism is misdirected, but the facts are still discouraging. Despite some success against particular infectious diseases, the World Health Organization is helpless to deal with the kleptocratic politics of the poor nations, where governments want their people sick. Instead of focusing on what it does best, it has taken refuge behind a facade of rhetoric ("Health is...." "Health for all by the year 2000", etc.) and grandiose, useless programs. For the sickening facts, see Br. Med. J. 309: 1425, 1491, 1566 & 1636, 1994 and 310: 110 & 178, 1995; Lancet 345: 203, 1995; Lancet 351: 351, 743, 1998. At least the money doesn't seem to be going into the kleptocrats' Swiss bank accounts, which is itself quite an accomplishment.

    Today, most health-sector activities in the poor nations are funded by the World Bank, which has taken a hard-nosed attitude in the 1990's and required reform (i.e., the government must adopt policies that encourage free enterprise and a strong economy) and cooperation. See Lancet 351: 665, 1998.

WORDS FOR COMMON AND/OR TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASES: You need to know these terms.

    Epidemic: a disease that is widespread in a community of people. (It is often, but need not be, a contagious disease).

    Epizootic: an epidemic in a community of animals. (Pronounce it "EPP-ee-zoe-WOTT-ick".)

    Pandemic: a worldwide epidemic.

    Endemic: a never-ending epidemic.

    Infectious disease: one caused (or assumed to be caused) by micro-organisms (the infectious agents) that can be transmitted from creature to creature.

    Zoonosis: an infectious disease that people usually acquire from sick animals rather than from other people.

    Vector: an organism, usually an insect, that carries an infectious disease from person to person, etc.

    Carrier: a person who harbors the infectious agents but has no symptoms.

    Reservoir: the place (usually animals or carriers) where an infectious agent lives between epidemics.

HOW COMMON IS A DISEASE?

    First, you must define the disease and the population.

      Criteria for making the diagnosis of a disease are generally established by pathologists. The autopsy is still ultimate proof of the presence or absence of most diseases.

      The population may be all the people in Kansas City, all the pregnant women in Missouri, all the US citizens currently living in Tokyo, all the scleroderma patients attending a certain clinic, etc.

    Incidence: the number of new cases during a period of time (generally new cases per 100,000 population per year)

    Prevalence: the total number of cases during a period of time (generally cases per 100,000 population)

    Obviously, incidence equals prevalence divided by average duration.

OUR FATAL DISEASES YESTERDAY

    Our ancestors died of bacterial diseases, smallpox, famine, trauma, and obstetrical catastrophes. Cancer and gout probably followed. Mosquito-borne diseases have also been very important in warmer regions.

      The common bacterial infections caused the majority of deaths, young and old people.

      Pneumococcal pneumonia was such a common killer of the elderly that it was called "the old man's friend". It did not spare the young, either. Dr. William Osler called the pneumococcus "captain of the men of death". Today penicillin ("the old man's enemy") cures all but neglected cases.

      Other gram-positive cocci (staphylococcus, streptococcus) were major killers. They produce a variety of illnesses.

      Tuberculosis ("the white plague") killed 1 person in 5. Today almost all cases are curable using drugs.

      Syphilis killed 1 person in 5 or even more in the centuries after its introduction, and caused chronic severe pain and/or insanity in many more. Today it is easily cured using antibiotics.

      Bubonic plague ("black death") killed half the people in Europe and Asia every few centuries. Now it is easy to cure.

      Typhus, a rickettsial disease transmitted by lice, was another highly fatal epidemic disease, especially during wartime. Cholera was yet another major epidemic killer, especially during the 1800's.

      Tetanus killed more victims of war wounds than the wounds themselves did. Today almost everybody in the US is effectively immunized against to tetanus toxin.

        Russell Crowe's character in "Gladiator" reflected after the battle about how many of his men would go on to die of wound infections.

      Infantile diarrhea is usually a bacterial disease. It is still a major world-wide killer. All these babies could be saved were it not for political, social, and economic problems.

      Influenza, caused by a virus, was another dread epidemic disease. Death is usually due to bacterial superinfection of the damaged lungs.

      Yellow fever (caused by a virus) and malaria (caused by a protozoan) were two very important, mosquito-borne killers.

      Smallpox, caused by a virus, was the leading cause of death in many countries until vaccination made it preventable.

    Most people in the US are immunized: against these diseases, which would otherwise be common:

      Diphtheria
      Measles
      Mumps
      Pertussis ("whooping cough")
      Rubella ("German measles")
      Poliomyelitis
      Smallpox (thought to be extinct today)
      Tetanus

    Several relatively common, noninfectious, non-cancerous diseases that were once often fatal but are now usually cured by surgery.

      Abdominal aortic aneurysms
      Appendicitis
      Berry aneurysms
      Benign ovarian tumors
      Bleeding peptic ulcers
      Cardiac valvular problems
      Congenital heart diseases
      Dissecting aneurysm
      Diverticulitis
      Ectopic pregnancies
      Gallstones
      GI malformations
      Intussusception of the bowel
      Kidney stones
      Obstetrical problems
      Strangulated hernias
      Volvulus

    Without high technology, these would all be important killers once again. (The only exception is smallpox, which seems to be extinct, but could well reappear as a biological weapon.)

OUR FATAL DISEASES TODAY

    What kills the two million people who die yearly in the US?

    Atherosclerosis

      Myocardial infarction ("heart attack") and sudden cardiac death

        (These together cause 600,000 deaths per year.)

      Stroke (200,000 deaths per year)

      Ruptured aortic aneurysm (less common)

      (These figures include diabetics, because most diabetics die of atherosclerosis.)

      Risk factors for atherosclerosis are:

        (1) Elevated serum cholesterol (by far the most important)
        (2) Cigaret smoking
        (3) High blood pressure
        (4) Diabetes mellitus (less important than any of the first three factors)
        (5) Lack of exercise (less important than any of the first four factors)
        (6) Hereditary differences in the lipoprotein molecules and their receptors, homocysteine metabolism, and the coagulation proteins. Some of these are very important, and are being sorted out.
        (7) Obesity? stress? (Whether these are independent risk factors is unclear. You will have to decide for yourself!)

    Cancer (over half a million deaths in the US each year)

      Any cancer, untreated, will eventually kill the patient.

      Approximately 25% of US citizens die of cancer

        Slightly more men than women die, since breast cancers are often cured.

      See the earlier section on common serious diseases for information about various cancers. Remember lung cancer is now the commonest cancer killer of both men and women. ("You've come a long way, Baby.")

    Emphysema and chronic bronchitis (150,000 deaths per year)

      Cigaret smoking causes the overwhelming majority of fatal cases.

    High blood pressure and heart pump failure (100,000 deaths per year)

      High blood pressure promotes atherosclerosis and kidney disease, but it can also kill by causing heart pump failure.

      Heart pump failure ("congestive heart failure") may also be due to disease of the valves, anatomical defects, amyloidosis, drugs, virus infections, and so forth.

    Alcoholism is the other leading cause of "natural" (?!) death:

      Cirrhosis of the liver (70,000 deaths per year from this alone; in the US, alcohol is the usual cause.)

      Alcohol is also involved in a majority of homicides, suicides, and accidents.

    Pulmonary thromboembolus is primary cause of 50,000 deaths a year. (The source is usually a leg vein, sometimes a pelvic vein.)

      Many more patients with serious underlying diseases die with these travelling thrombi as the final mechanism.

    Kidney disease (35,000 deaths a year)

      Common fatal kidney diseases include chronic glomerulonephritis, chronic interstitial nephritis ("pyelonephritis"), and adult polycystic kidney disease.

      Diabetes mellitus, amyloidosis, systemic lupus, and bad high blood pressure are other common causes of end-stage kidney disease.

    Alzheimer's disease (including "senility") causes many deaths, usually through bacterial-aspiration pneumonia.

    Bacterial and aspiration pneumonias are common final mechanisms of death in many debilitating diseases.

      Today, the pneumonias seldom kill a previously-healthy young person.

    Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)

      In some communities, AIDS remains a leading cause of death.

    Unnatural deaths:

      Homicides (around 30,000 per year)

      Suicides (true number unknown, estimates give it around 50,000 per year)

      "Accidents" (around 100,000 per year)

      When pathologists speak of the manner of death, we mean "natural", "homicide", "suicide", or "accidental". We may also conclude, after autopsy, that the manner of death is "undetermined".

      Iatrogenic disease is disease caused by medical diagnosis and/or treatment. It is epidemic, though deaths are usually listed under the patient's disease and often would have occurred anyway. (Classical scholars call it "iatrogenous disease"....) For the disturbing Harvard study, see NEJM 324: 307 & 377, 1991.

What kills young people in the US?

    "Before birth":

      An unknown percentage (at least 31%, maybe more -- NEJM 319: 189, 1988) of fertilized eggs fail to implant or are lost before pregnancy is recognized.

      Around 1 out of every 6 known implantations is followed by spontaneous miscarriage.

      There are around 1.5 million legal abortions performed in the US yearly. (Contrast this to large areas where both contraception and abortion are illegal, and where illegal abortion is the leading cause of death in women aged 15-39: Br. Med. J. 300: 1705, 1990.)

      You will have to decide for yourself what all this means.

    Under one year: Prematurity and birth defects

      Around 1.3% of US newborns die from these causes. This is pretty good; only a few nations with fewer % poor do better.

      Mysterious "sudden infant death syndrome" kills around 0.5% of infants during the first year of life. See below.

    Ages 1-19:

      Males:

        (1) "Accidents" (around 8000 / year)

        (2) Homicide (around 2500 / year)

          (Homicide is extremely common in the age 10-20 range in certain U.S. communities; JAMA 267: 2905, 1992)

        (3) Suicide (around 1700/year)

        (4) Cancer (around 1200/year)

      Females:

        (1) "Accidents" (around 4000 / year)

        (2) Cancer (around 1000 / year)

        (3) Homicide (around 700 / year, double the suicide rate)

      Child abuse and neglect causes some deaths among children. The true prevalence is unknown and is controversial -- at least some are overlooked ("accidents" or "sudden infant death syndrome"). Likewise, the incidence of infanticide in the developing nations is unknown, but is probably high.

    Ages 20-39:

      Males:

        (1) Accidents (around 20,000 / year)

        (2) Suicide (around 9000 / year)

        (3) Homicide (around 8000 / year)

        (4) Heart disease, followed closely by cancer and then HIV infection

      Females:

        (1) Accidents (around 6000 / year)

        (2) Cancer (Around 6000 / year)

        (3) Heart disease (around 2800 / year)

        (4) Suicide, followed closely by homicide and HIV infection

    Natural death in young athletes:

    • Coronary artery atherosclerosis (think of hereditary cholesterol problems; marathon runners' immunity to atherosclerosis is a lie)

    • Coronary artery malformations

    • Berry aneurysms

    • Hereditary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    • Right ventricular dysplasia (Am. J. Med. 89: 588, 1990)

    • Conduction system problems (WPW, long QT syndrome, Brugada)

    • Cocaine use

    • Electrolyte problems (i.e., diuretic abuse)

    • Myocarditis

The average American's chances of being killed by (Nature 367: 39, 1994):

    motor vehicle accident... 1 in 100
    murder... 1 in 300
    house fire... 1 in 800
    firearm accident... 1 in 2500
    electrocution... 1 in 5000
    passenger plane crash... 1 in 20,000
    flood... 1 in 30,000
    tornado... 1 in 60,000
    fireworks... 1 in 1 million
    botulism... 1 in 3 million
    asteroid or comet impact with earth... 1 in 3000 to 1 in 250,000

LIFESTYLE-RELATED DISEASES:

    Today's deadly diseases in the US are largely lifestyle-related. (This is one factor that contributes to physicians' dissatisfaction with their work!)

    Alcohol abuse and nicotine addiction are grave public health problems. Use of certain of the illegal drugs (amphetamine, cocaine, heroin, phencyclidine, others) is clearly harmful.

      Contrary to what you have been told by doctor-bashers, the prevalence of alcoholism and drug addiction among physicians is substantially lower than among their non-physician peers. However, doctors do have an unfortunate tendency to prescribe mind-altering substances for themselves. Don't do this. See JAMA 267: 2333, 1992.

    Sexual promiscuity (homosexual, heterosexual) causes many health problems.

    Obesity and lack of exercise probably contribute to ill-health.

    Americans tend to eat too much salt, saturated fat and cholesterol, too many calories, and too little fiber. Sucrose (cane sugar) is bad for the teeth.

    Sunlight is the principal cause of all three common skin cancers, as well as the cancer that arises within the adult eye. (Sunlight also helps activate vitamin D, but vitamin D supplementation of food has apparently eliminated our need for sunlight.)

    Some food additives that make some people sick are tartrazine yellow (dye), monosodium glutamate ("Chinese restaurant syndrome"), wasabi (horseradish served with sushi, the "Japanese restaurant syndrome"), and sulfites ("salad-bar asthma").

Despite the claims of "alternative medicine", the following are probably not significant health problems. (Let us know if you have additional facts about these.)

    • lack of sunlight (where there are other ways to get vitamin D)

    • refined sugar

    • white flour

    • coffee and tea

    • cow's milk

    • Pasteurized milk

    • Bovine growth hormone

    • cooked ("dead") food

    • antiperspirants

    • fluoridated water

    • tap water

    • food preservatives

    • pesticide residues

    • immunizations

    • subclinical vitamin and mineral deficiencies (except folic acid in junk-food-only folks and folks who need more because of kinks in their metabolisms, and vitamin D in old folks)

    • amygdalin ("laetrile", "vitamin B-17") deficiency

    • pangamic acid ("vitamin B-15", usually glycine or sugar) deficiency

    • toxic bowel settlement ("removed only at enema parlors")

    • spinal subluxations (undetectable except by traditional chiropractors)

INHERITED DISEASE AND BIRTH DEFECTS

    Commonest serious Mendelian genetic diseases:

    • Familial hypercholesterolemia ("hyperlipidemia type II") (?? 1/200)

    • Polycystic kidneys (1/800 adults)

    • Fragile X (1/1500 men)

    • Cystic fibrosis (1/1600 white kids)

    • Sickle cell disease (1/1600 black kids)

    • Von Recklinghausen's disease (1/2500 people)

    • Tuberous sclerosis (?? 1/1000)

    • Duchenne's muscular dystrophy, "Jerry's kids", 1/3500 boys)

    Many genetic syndromes are much more prevalent within particular ethnic groups. No race is "superior". Here are a few to remember:

    • Alpha-thalassemias and sickle-thals (Blacks)

    • Beta-thalassemias (Mediterraneans)

    • Gaucher's disease (Jewish people)

    • G-6-PD deficiencies (a mild Black form, a severe Mediterranean form)

    • Hemoglobin C and sickle-C diseases (Blacks)

    • Hemoglobin E disease (Vietnamese)

    • Hereditary spherocytosis (Scotch-Irish)

    • Joseph Disease (Portuguese)

    • Pyruvate kinase deficiency (Amish)

    • Tay-Sachs disease (Jewish people)

    While we're here... I have often questioned the value of declaring the person's race at the beginning of the case presentation. I give my "race" as "human", and believe that everybody else should, too. Compared with Euro-Americans, Afro-Americans have substantially more deaths due to high blood pressure, plasma cell myeloma, and prostate cancer, and substantially fewer deaths due to malignant melanoma; they also have far less osteoporosis and testicular cancer.

      The suicide rate among black men in the US is also far lower than among white men. For a review, see Lancet 351: 934, 1998.

    The commonest chromosomal syndromes are Klinefelter's (XXY; 1/850) and Down's syndromes (trisomy 21; maybe 1/1000). Turner's (XO) and "supermale" ( XYY, a curious subject) are slightly less common.

    The commonest catastrophic birth defects are neural tube defects (bad "spina bifida", etc.; 1/500 births) and cerebral palsy (maybe 1/400).

DREAD DISEASES OF YOUNG ADULTS:

    Several common, chronic diseases that can be really bad and that begin during young adult life are listed here, with their approximate prevalence among young adults.

    • Alcoholism (8%)

    • Ankylosing spondylitis (0.1%)

    • Berry aneurysm rupture (0.2%)

    • Major mood disorder ("manic-depression", 0.7%)

    • Multiple sclerosis (0.1%)

    • Regional enteritis (0.1%)

    • Rheumatoid arthritis (3%)

    • Schizophrenia (1%)

    • Systemic lupus erythematosus (0.5%)

    • Ulcerative colitis (0.3%)

"NEW DISEASES" (unknown, rare, or seldom recognized a few years ago):

    • Alexithymia

    • Angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy

    • Anticardiolipin antibody ("lupus anticoagulant") disease

    • Asperger's (high-functioning autism, great at science and math, much difficulty learning social skills)

    • Biliary sludge

    • Branhamella infections

    • BRCA1 anti-oncogene deletion syndrome
    • Brugada's: sudden death in young men with a characteristic EKG

    • Carbohydrate craving syndromes

    • Chlamydia TWAR, the asthma bug

    • Chlamydial sexually transmitted disease

    • Chronic infectious mononucleosis

    • Cryptosporidiosis

    • Dysplastic nevus syndrome

    • Esophageal chest pain (vascular spasm: -- Gastroent. 116: 28, 1999; Ann. Int. Med. 124: 1008, 1996)

    • Facet syndrome (back and neck pain)

    • Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia

    • Fetal alcohol syndrome

    • Fetal tobacco syndrome

    • Fibromyalgia syndrome ("fibrositis", "pain modulation syndrome")

    • Floppy mitral valve

    • Food allergies (the more subtle manifestations)

    • Fragile X syndrome (hemizygous, heterozygous)

    • Helicobacter infections

    • Herpes simplex II

    • Homocysteine problems (atherosclerosis, thrombosis)

    • Human papillomavirus sexually transmitted disease

    • Hypercoagulability genes (antithrombin III and protein C and S deficiencies, V-Leiden)

    • Hürthle cell adenoma of the kidney

    • Iatrogenic hyponatremia (Br. Med. J. 304: 1218, 1992)

    • IgA nephropathy

    • Immotile cilia syndromes (Kartagener's, etc.)

    • Interstitial cystitis ("Hunner's ulcer")

    • Iron overload syndromes

    • Job's hyper-IgE syndrome

    • Kawasaki disease

    • Legionnaire's disease

    • Li Fraumeni anti-oncogene deletion syndrome

    • Long QT (about 4000 deaths per year in the US alone)

    • Lyme arthritis

    • "New" complications of chronic hemodialysis (amyloidosis, kidney cancer)

    • Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

    • Non-polyposis familial colon cancer

    • Obsessive-compulsive problems (once "rare")

    • Parvo 19

    • Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn

    • Post-streptococcal behavioral changes ("PANDAS")

    • Renal tubular acidosis

    • Retrovirus infections (AIDS, epidemic leukemia, etc.)

    • Severe acute respiratory syndrome (coronavirus) / hantavirus pneumonia
    • SAPHO (acne, pustules within bones, odd bony overgrowths especially on the chest joints)

    • Seasonal affective disorder

    • Sjogren's encephalopathy

    • Sleep apnea

    • Sleep-related eating disorders

    • Sulfite allergy ("salad bar disease")

    • Thrombophilias (inherited hypercoagulable blood; several dominant genes)

    • Transient stress lymphocytosis (wasn't on the books, but I think it was generally known)

    • Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome ("the pain isn't sexual, the sex is painful"; I think it's an organic pain syndrome -- until recently they got sent to the psychiatrist)

"NON-DISEASES" (i.e., named entities that produce no morbidity or are beneficial)

    • Absent deep tendon reflexes, many other "neuro" curiosities

    • Birthmarks (most types), cherry angiomas

    • Carbon pigmentation of the lung ("uncomplicated black lung")

    • Cardiac rhythm disturbances (certain types)

    • Carrier states, including thalassemia minima and most thalassemia minors

    • Certain inborn errors of metabolism (some are even "longevity genes")

    • Exercise-related "abnormalities" ("athlete's heart", lab test changes)

    • Ectopias (Fordyce granules, etc.)

    • Freckles, lentigos, common nevi, most anisocoria and vitiligo cases, morphea

    • Hyperlipidemia type IV ("isolated hypertriglyceridemia")

    • Macroamylasemia (idiopathic type), many other lab curiosities

    • Medial calcific sclerosis of the arteries ("Monckeberg's")

    • Minor malformations (torus, Darwin's tubercles, fused toes, many others)

    • Nail anomalies (most)

    • Orthostatic proteinuria, thin-GBM non-disease

    • Physiologic jaundice of the newborn, "Gilbert's" bilirubin conjugation defects

    • Pigments from medications (melanosis coli, argyria) or food (carotenemia)

    • Soldier's plaque of the epicardium

    • Sugar-icing of the peritoneal surfaces

    • Tinea versicolor, other trivial infestations

    • Tongue anomalies: most geographics, hairys, rhomboids, and scrotals

    Some of these might be considered minor cosmetic problems, or patients may actually like them.

EASY-TO-MISS DISEASES

    Primary care is the pinnacle of medical practice because the physician must constantly be asking, "What is the WORST TREATABLE thing this COULD POSSIBLY be?" Then the physician must rule this out (or in).

    Here's my list of easy-to-miss, easy-to-treat, deadly-if-untreated diseases.

    • addisonism (adrenal cortical insufficiency; several causes)

    • arsenic poisoning

    • B12 deficiency (pernicious anemia, fad diets)

    • bacterial endocarditis

    • bacterial meningitis (easy to miss in the very young)

    • Behcet's

    • carbon monoxide poisoning (bad home heater; miss this and the whole family dies)

    • carcinoid syndrome

    • cerebrospinal fluid leak

    • compartment syndrome (you won't get another chance...)

    • cryoglobulinemia syndromes

    • cushingism (adrenal cortical hyperfunction; several causes)

    • gas gangrene / flesh-eater streptococcus (you won't get another chance...)

    • hemochromatosis

    • hereditary angioedema

    • hyperthyroidism (especially its atypical presentations)

    • hypopituitarism (don't miss any form, including adult growth hormone deficiency)

    • hypothyroidism

    • insulinoma

    • lead poisoning

    • long QT

    • Lyme disease

    • manganese poisoning

    • meningococcal infection

    • neurosyphilis

    • normal pressure hydrocephalus

    • osteomalacia / vitamin D deficiency (especially with today's fad diets)

    • pheochromocytoma

    • polyarteritis nodosa / Churg-Strauss

    • porphyrias (a whole bunch of them)

    • relapsing polychondritis

    • renovascular hypertension

    • Rocky Mountain spotted fever

    • sarcoidosis

    • sleep apnea

    • sporotrichosis

    • Stevens-Johnson syndrome

    • temporal arteritis

    • thallium poisoning

    • tuberculosis, especially in the meninges

    • Wegener's granulomatosis

    • Whipple's (especially its atypical presentations)

    • Wilson's copper overload

DISEASES WE SKIP

    In this course, we do not discuss certain functional medical problems (i.e., those that lack any known anatomic correlate). However, it is obvious that physiologic defects are essential to these processes.

    • Addictions (alcoholism, heroin, cocaine, nicotine, etc.)

    • Functional obesity, anorexia nervosa, bulemia

    • Schizophrenia, autism, major affective disorders

    • Idiopathic epilepsy, narcolepsy, sleep apnea, trigeminal neuralgia

    • Panic disorder, agoraphobia, globus hystericus

    • Conversion reaction, obsessions and compulsions

    • Attention disorder ("hyperactive child"), learning and reading problems

    • Some personality disorders and gender identity problems, alexithymia

    • Phantom limb phenomenon, causalgias

    • Functional headaches (tension, migraine, cluster), benign familial tremor

    • Normal pressure hydrocephalus, pseudotumor cerebri

    • Functional bowel syndrome ("spastic colon"), "colonic inertia" (slow-transit-time constipation), menstrual cramps, bashful bladder, premenstrual syndrome

    • Proctalgia fugax, prostatodynia, nocturnal leg cramps

    • Fibromyalgia syndrome ("fibrositis")

    • Orthostatic proteinuria, intermittent idiopathic hematuria

    • Idiopathic paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, other arrhythmias, heart blocks

    • Idiopathic infertility, other sexual problems

    • Movement disorders (torticollis, Tourette's, blepharospasm, myoclonus, "restless legs")

Other important medical problems are largely mechanical and you will learn about these on your rotations.


    • Burns and their complications

    • Intertrigo, decubiti (bedsores), stercoraceous ulcers, fecal impaction

    • Functional heart murmurs

    • Cleft palate, pilonidal cysts

    • Hernias, cystoceles, rectal and uterine prolapses

    • Muscle strains and sprains, tendinitis, bursitis, carpal tunnel syndromes

    • Specific fractures and their complications

    • Dislocations, subluxations, compartment syndromes

    • Nerve compressions

    • Bunions, ingrown toenails, ganglion cysts

    • Knee problems (torn menisci, torn ligaments, etc.)

    • Other non-traumatic joint problems (congenital hip dislocations, Legg-Calve-Perth's, Osgood-Schlatter's)

    • Back and neck problems (curvatures, strains, herniated nucleus pulposus, cervical spondylosis)

    • Obstetrical problems (cervical incompetence, disproportions, malpositions, placenta previa, abruption of the placenta)

    • Eye problems (presbyopia, cataracts, glaucoma, retinal detachment, strabismus, keratoconus)

    • Ear problems (otitis externa and media, Ménière's, Báràny's, otosclerosis, impacted cerumen)

A few other important entities usually fall outside the domain of anatomic pathology:


    Porphyrias and other inborn errors of metabolism have few or no anatomic changes, and we will discuss these only briefly. Retinitis pigmentosa is an important group of degenerative disorders of the retina, but pathologists almost never see them, since they are not biopsy-diseases.

    Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, blocks (bundle branch, Winckebach's, Mobitz II, Stokes-Adams attacks, etc.), channelopathies like Brugada's and long QT, and a host of other cardiac conduction-rhythm problems are diseases for electrocardiographers, not pathologists.

    Transient ischemic attacks of the brain ("little strokes"), amaurosis fugax, and related phenomena leave no anatomic traces.

    The anaphylactic, vasovagal, and vagovagal varieties of shock can cause death with little or no anatomic change. So can postural asphyxias ("swallowing the tongue", etc.)

    The anatomic pathology of cerebral concussion is unknown.

RIGHT TREATMENT, WRONG REASON

    "Science is self-correcting". In medical school, I was taught silly mechanisms ("nitrates dilate your calcified coronary arteries!") for the following treatments, which actually work well but by a different mechanism:

    • nitrates for angina pectoris (did anybody ever really believe that nitroglycerine dilated all those fibrotic and calcified coronary arteries?!)
    • bismuth for peptic ulcer and gastritis (the "antiacid and coating agent" actually kills the bacteria)
    • selenium ("blue shampoo") for dandruff and seborrhea (various fanciful mechanisms of action were discarded when we figured out that it really kills the fungi that cause dandruff)
    • nitroprusside for hypertensive crisis (breaks down into the previously-unknown endothelially-derived relaxation factor)
    • salicylazosulfapyridine for ulcerative colitis (watch for this one; it's an antibacterial that probably kills the bacteria that cause ulcerative colitis; currently "believed to work by inhibiting prostaglandin production and preventing inflammation", though it isn't in use for anything else)
    • interferon for Kaposi's "sarcoma"; in the early AIDS era, clinicians went gah-gah over "probable mechanisms of action against this cancer"; now it's clear that Kaposi's is not cancer at all, but a viral infection, and interferon is an anti-viral compound. Ditto interferon and hairy-cell leukemia.

MORE WORDS ABOUT DISEASES

    Symptoms: what the patient tells you, the physician.

    Signs: what you, the physician, discover on physical exam and special studies, by yourself or with help. Means the same as findings.

    Lesion: any unit of abnormal anatomy (less often, abnormal chemistry or an abnormal molecule)

    Morphology: the anatomic lesion(s)

    Etiology: what causes the disease. A noun or nouns. If it's external, it's called the etiologic agent. The etiology of many diseases is unknown.

    Pathogenesis: how the etiologic agent causes the disease. A short story that usually includes "many of the steps are presently unknown".

    Pathognomonic: a sign or group of signs that occur in only one disease. Same as diagnostic (of).

    Prognosis: how the patient can realistically expect to do.

    Syndrome: A group of symptoms and/or signs that tend to run together but may be caused by any of several diseases

THE GREATEST MISERY

    Which diseases cause the most overall suffering and time lost from work prior to old age? It is probably a near-tie:

    • Alcoholism (self, family member)
    • All other psychiatric disease together (schizophrenia, mood disorders, neurosis)
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (arthritis, low back pain)

MALE:FEMALE RATIOS

    Many diseases clearly occur more often in one sex or the other.

      The reasons for this are seldom known, but will probably be discovered. (For example, pre-menopausal women are immune to South American blastomycosis because estrogens cause the fungus to revert to hyphal form, which is easily killed by the body.)

    These rules of thumb work most of the time:

      Women are more likely to get any disease in which autoimmunity is believed to be an important mechanism (except diseases linked to a particular class I HLA molecule, i.e., ankylosing spondylitis and its family).

      Women also are more prone to develop significant osteoporosis.

      Men are more likely to get all the other diseases.

THE MOST INTERESTING DISEASES

    This is a matter of opinion. You may decide the psychiatric disorders are the most interesting.

    Especially intriguing are treatable organic diseases that affect the mind. Remember these before you commit your patient to psychotherapy or a life in custodial care!

    • Adrenal gland problems (too much or too little cortisol or catecholamine)

    • Brain infections (remember cryptococcus, herpes simplex I, Lyme disease, HIV)

    • Brain tumors (especially meningiomas) and many other brain diseases

    • Brucellosis, other chronic infections

    • Drugs (know atropine, digitalis, methyldopa, reserpine, drugs of abuse)

    • Epilepsy (especially temporal lobe problems and psychomotor seizures)

    • Hashimoto's encephalopathy

    • Hypoglycemia (early type II diabetes, insulin shock, tumors, functional)

    • Immunologic disease (systemic lupus, IgE-mediated allergies)

    • Infectious mononucleosis (Epstein-Barr, cytomegalovirus "mono")

    • Osteomalacia (not all of your "total body pain" patients have fibromyalgia....)
    • Parathyroid disease (hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia), other calcium problems

    • Poisoning (especially mercury)

    • Porphyrias (especially acute intermittent)

    • Potassium problems (too much, too little)

    • Sensory deprivation (is your patient blind? deaf?)

    • Syphilis ("general paralysis of the insane") and perhaps Lyme disease

    • Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

    • Thyroid problems (too much thyroid hormone, or too little)

    • Vitamin B1, B3, and B12 deficiencies

    • Wilson's disease (copper disposal problem)

CULT DIAGNOSES ("imaginary diseases")

    "A court of law is not a good place to try to get at the truth." Certain "cult" diagnoses have had a devastating impact on both their "victims" and those around them. People with emotional problems typically feel chronically unwell. (The mainstay of therapy is to learn new living skills to replace those that were once required to survive in an abusive home.) However, once such a person self-diagnoses or is diagnosed as having a "cult" diagnosis, he/she gains "victim" status, will make absurd demands on others, and will get sicker and sicker.

    Multiple chemical sensitivities is seen almost exclusively in survivors of real child abuse. Strangely, most or all synthetic chemicals cause symptoms (but no objective signs), exactly at the threshold at which the chemical can be smelled. Natural chemicals do not have this effect. The obvious conclusion is the correct one. Tell such a person that an odor is synthetic (even carbon dioxide), and it will produce symptoms. Victims typically try to force everyone around them not to use cologne or deodorant, etc., etc. If a schoolchild is designated as "victim", all the teachers and other kids are affected. And so forth.

    The false memories syndrome ruined thousands of lives for the falsely-accused before society finally wised up. Rather than learn new methods of coping with adult life, emotionally-disturbed people were told instead that they were horribly scarred by (probably-imaginary) forgotten sexual abuse and/or satanic cult exposure and/or alien abduction. Again, the cult keeps people sick.

    There are certain to be more cults like this in the future. As physicians, you will discover that if you suggest to someone that a particular symptom will develop, it will. This makes these iatrogenic diseases.

TREATING DISEASE

    We are healthy because of good food, good sanitation, adequate living space, public health programs, and a good medical system for treating diseases and injuries. (It is hard to say which of these is most important.)

    Some diseases can be cured.

      Examples include surgical diseases (localized cancers, appendicitis, hernias, gallstones, etc.), and bacterial and parasitic diseases.

      Surgery became practical with antisepsis in the later 1800's, while the antibiotics came into use in the 1940's. Before this, the history of therapeutics was essentially the history of quackery and iatrogenic disease.

    Most other diseases are not curable, but can be treated.

      Treatments that work well are generally simple once you understand the pathology. Treatments that don't work well are generally quite elaborate. (One notable exception is chemotherapy for a few cancers, principally those that occur in young people.)

      Again, most effective treatments are of relatively recent origin.

    Your patients may be self-conscious about disease that cannot be treated, and cannot be hidden.

      Other people tend to shy away from the person who's visibly different.

      Not for sissies, but the best, and easiest, ice-breaker when the problem cannot be hidden is for the patient to draw attention to the problem. Decorate your wheelchair (movie, "Silver Bullet"). Put plastic flowers on your crutches. "Do you like my birthmark [grin]? Feel how rough it is!" "Every hair fell out of my body when I was only six!" "A bear did that to me [chuckle]." "I'm a hobbit." Choose a nickname ("Folks call me 'Patch' / 'Spot' / 'Eraser Man'!")

    The practice of medicine in the U.S. has become so corrupted by big-money and big-egos (plus an occasional bit of sheer stupidity) that Americans now trust their lawyers more than their physicians, particularly to explain all the options truthfully and to act according to their wishes (NEJM 330: 223, 1994).

      I would like you to help change this back. I will give you the knowledge and the power to reason; you need to find the integrity within yourselves.

    The medical care that people receive in the US is high-quality but very expensive. Often the benefits of treatment are obvious, often they are not. Our society has decided to make it hardest for the working poor to obtain basic care, and rations the care for those with access by "managed care". Expect this to change.

      Health care costs total around 12% of our gross national product. Remember these equal health care incomes. Physician's bills make up around 30% of this. In 1992, we spent $800,000,000,000 on health care.

      The British health care system generates only half the costs (and half the incomes) of our health care system. The British seem to be just as healthy as we are.

      It is commonplace for the hospital bill for a profoundly brain-damaged premature baby to total $100,000 or more. (By comparison, the amount spent to save each otter after the Exxon Valdez oil spill was a mere $80,000: Science 254: 1596, 1991.)

      The average cost to the family of a child who has died of leukemia (not counting the portion that their insurance pays) is $38,000. (There are around 12,000 new cases of childhood leukemia per year; around half of them get cured, the other half die.)

      In mid-1986, the average AIDS victim lived 160 days with the disease, and died with medical bills totalling $140,000. A lot has changed since then, but the cost of treating ten American AIDS victims exceeds the total health care expenditures of several developing nations with millions of sick people.

      There are now 10,000 people in the United States in irreversible comas. There are many thousands more with profound mental impairments or "locked in". (All these are unkindly called "vegetables"; "apallic" means no working cortex.) All would die quickly without continuous medical care, and someone pays $130,000 per patient per year (Br. Med. J. 301: 1094, 1990).

      Today, the usual cause of a well-to-do US family's being reduced to poverty is medical bills for the care of one member.

      Around 28 million US citizens have little access to primary health care because they have neither insurance nor welfare.

      One factor that makes health care more expensive in the US is large awards in medical malpractice cases. The average award today is over one million dollars.

      It is probably inevitable that any system of health care distribution will contain perverse incentives (Sci. Am. 269(1): 24, July 1993) either to overtreat-overcharge (fee-for-service, defensive medicine) or to undertreat (HMO's/managed care, British socialized medicine).

    Disease can ruin the quality of life for a person. Most of us physicians find it hard not to treat disease under any circumstances.

      Managed care saved the health care system in the mid-1990's. Managed death is next. Most states now have a Natural Death Act, reflecting a world-wide movement. (Of course, you don't stop treating all patients who say they want to die.) Right or wrong, by the time you are in practice, active euthanasia, under some circumstances, will almost certainly be legal throughout most, if not all, of the U.S.

      Active euthanasia is already a fact of life in most countries (for example, Hastings Center Reports 22(6): 3, Nov.-Dec. 1992), though it remains illegal. French physicians talk freely about euthanizing babies when there is profound neurological damage (Lancet 355: 2112, 2000). The Dutch legalized active euthanasia experience: Lancet 338: 669, 1991. Euthanasia was lately (1997) legal, with some controls, in parts of Australia (NEJM 334: 326, 1996). However, this was reversed on political pressure. Oregon's "Ballot Issue 16" succeeded in 1994 and was strongly supported by the Federal appeals court (i.e., the government has no reason to interfere with a terminally-sick person's desire to die comfortably; this thinking would put active euthanasia on a par with legal abortion). Colombia legalized it in 1997 (Br. Med. J. 3134: 1852, 1997), the same month that the Supreme Court decided that physician-assisted suicide was not a constitutional right, but that the states could decide (Washington vs. Glicksberg, Vacco vs. Quill). Oregon made it legal in 1997 (NEJM 340: 577, 1999), and it has had a major impact on terminal care, not so much that assisted suicide is being carried out but that physicians have educated themselves about things they can do instead (JAMA 285: 2363, 2001; JAMA 288: 91, 2002 is a good "what to do when..." article). The reason people choose it is mostly out of fear of losing autonomy and/or bowel/bladder control (NEJM 342: 598, 2000). Suicide and assisting suicide for an altruistic motive have always been legal in modern Switzerland, and the Swiss will probably soon legalize active euthanasia (Br. Med. J. 321: 271, 2003). Active euthanasia used to bother me some. However, it is now pretty clear that a solid majority of the American public wants to allow active euthanasia in certain incurable-disease situations: (NEJM 326: 197, 1992; JAMA 267: 2658, 1992; according to the JAMA, several mostly-pro-life demographic segments that one would expect to oppose the idea actually support it strongly). In 1992, a state referendum (Washington Initiative 119) failed; exit polls showed it failed only because voters thought the particular ballot proposal lacked sufficient controls. Both the physicians and the public in Jack Kevorkian's Michigan seem to strongly prefer legalization over an explicit ban (NEJM 304: 303, 1996). The British overwhelmingly favor active euthanasia in cases of intractable suffering and useless life: Br. Med. J. 305: 728, 1992. Even the British Medical Journal, not noted for its radical editorials, called Jack Kevorkian a "hero": Br. Med. J. 312: 1431, 1996. The Netherlands experience, and a little number juggling for the US, indicates that physician-assisted suicide won't be a huge money-saver for the public (NEJM 339: 167, 1998) -- implicit is the reassurance that it won't do major harm to health care incomes. More from the Netherlands: NEJM 342: 551, 2000. Mount Sinai euthanasia survey: NEJM 338:1193, 1998. According to this anonymous poll, it's not as widespread in the US as you might think. Only about 10% of oncologists say they have performed physician-assisted suicide (Ann. Int. Med. 133: 527, 2000)

      New definitions of death will focus on permanent loss of higher cortical functions and allow a physician to pronounce a patient dead while the heart is beating (Hast. Cent. Rep. 23(4): 18, 1993; I said years ago this would happen as the need for health care rationing became obvious). For some reason (not physicians' incomes, surely), the AMA still goes gah-gah over both active euthanasia and physician participation in capital punishment (JAMA 270: 365, 1993, though abortion for convenience isn't a problem), but the AMA is now willing to publish neutral articles on what a physician should do if asked for active euthanasia (accompanied, of course, by reaffirmations of its opposition to active euthanasia; JAMA 270: 870, 874 & 875, 1993). The New England Journal no longer subscribes to the anti-euthanasia taboo: NEJM 334: 1374, 1996.

      Were I to request active or passive euthanasia, or end my life to escape the ravages of disease or injury (any of which I might at some time do), I would want at least some of the money that would have been spent on my care to go to help poor children who would otherwise not have a chance in life. I suspect that most decent people think similarly, and a few physicians are finally finding the courage to say as much in public (South Afr Med. J. (!): 82: 35, 1992).

    Today's medicine causes health problems. Much of this is unavoidable, and is even expected. Iatrogenic ("doctor-caused") problems include:

      • complications of surgery, drugs, radiation, and other therapies
      • expected and unexpected effects of invasive diagnostic procedures
      • patient misunderstandings and stigmatization
      • "economic morbidity" to patients and their families

      In considering today's epidemic of iatrogenic disease, we must remember that all the writings of Hippocrates ("First Do No Harm") do not contain a single remedy specific for a particular disease.

    It is a fact that patients almost always misrepresent what has happened between them and any physician. (For example, I have never heard a physician tell a patient how long he or she would live.) Remember this when you take patient histories, and when you hear "testimonials" (good or bad).

UNCONVENTIONAL TREATMENTS

    Many sick people seek treatment from outside the hated "medical establishment". They may choose from a wide range of unconventional healers.

    Many people claim that they have been healed by unconventional means. You will have to form your own opinion about each case.

      Rheumatoid arthritis, regional enteritis, multiple sclerosis, and warts often seem to respond remarkably well to spiritual healing. I know no naturalistic explanation for these cases, though there might be one, and there are no "placebo-controlled studies".

      If you investigate other cases thoroughly, you will most often discover that the patient never had the disease, or was cured by conventional means, or had a self-limited disease, or still has the disease.

      Denial of illness is characteristic of many sick people. Remember also that some people are under great pressure to say they have been healed "spiritually". Many people still believe that serious disease is a punishment for extraordinary sinfulness (their own, their parents').

        As a lawyer, Ms. Rodham-Clinton wrote a brief arguing that the state could force parents who believed their child's cleft palate was "God's punishment" to have it fixed anyway. The Republicans (convention, 1992) cited this as proof she was "anti-family".

      When you read articles pointing out that sick people who attend church seem to do better than those who don't, bear in mind that those attending church are perhaps not so sick and/or have a better support system.

    Most clergy are happy to work with physicians, and a spirit of mutual respect usually prevails.

    Two references on "commercial" (?) faith-healing:

      Dr. William Nolen's Healing: A Doctor in Search of a Miracle, 1974. Dr. Nolen, a Christian, personally investigated Katheryn Kuhlmann, occultist Norbu Chen, and the Filipino psychic surgeons. Dr. Nolen saw no evidence of any miracles. All but Kuhlmann were blatant and shameless frauds.

      Professional stage magician James Randi's personal investigation of TV faith-healers appears in The Faith Healers, Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1987. Mr. Randi describes many fraudulent practices. (For me, the most damning of all the observations is that the "televangelists" never approach or televise the members of the audience that are truly and visibly sick -- multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, visible tumors, obvious deformities, etc.)

    People in the US spend over ten billion dollars per year on the unproven remedies of alternative medicine. This is several times greater than the total spent on medical research.

      Almost without exception, health-care providers who say they use alternative techniques have never tested their methods by honest, controlled experiments. Instead, they have six standard excuses.

      (1) "Our methods are harmless and pleasant."

      (2) "Our methods are less expensive than the AMA's."

      (3) "Our methods are spiritual and/or cannot be explained."

      (4) "We will never treat individual 'whole persons' as statistics."

      (5) "The methods of science are invalid (Einstein's relativity, Heisenberg's uncertainty, 'Postmodernism', etc.)"

      (6) "We don't have any money for research." (!?!)

      Alternative practitioners make a great show of loving their patients. They are also much more likely than faith-healers to attack the characters, motives, and skill of honest physicians.

        NOTE: In 1986, the average yearly income for a chiropractor, after taxes and expenses, was $116,000.

      Attacks on genuine science come from both the screwball right and the screwball left, and are hallmarks of both. Now that the left-wing social agenda (i.e., massive government redistribution of wealth and opportunity) is overwhelmingly unpopular around the world, left-wing nuts in "academia" have little to do except bad-mouth science, which nobody understands anyway. For example, in 1995, the $5.3 million dollar Smithsonian "Science in American Life" exhibit omitted all reference to the space program and the transistor in favor of an emphasis on underrepresentation of women and minorities in science, and how research is often driven by the corporate profit motive instead of pure altruism (Nature 374: 207, 1995; and you thought Marxist ideology was dead?) A real scientist on the project complains about domination of the whole project by left-wing "social scientists and pseudoscientists who had no idea how science really works."

    Evidence that spiritual healing or alternative remedies are ever effective remains anecdotal.

    But right or wrong, spiritual healers and alternative medical practitioners have a tremendous impact on your patients' perceptions of disease and medical doctors.

    In particular, be aware that some of your most helpless patients will have their therapeutic and pain medications withheld by families who have bought into "spiritual" ("Christian" or "New Age") or "alternative healing".

    As of this writing, the Office of Alternative Medicine (now the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine), established at the NIH for political reasons, isn't inspiring much confidence (Sci. Am. 269(3): 39, Sept. 1993; JAMA 280: 1553, 1998)

HOLISTIC MEDICINE

    Classical pathology describes discrete diseases and this enables us to treat patients effectively. There actually are different diseases that are best treated by different methods.

      Offering a simple-minded explanation and a "safe natural treatment" for the "whole" of disease (or to strengthen the "whole" patient) are standard ploys of the medical quack.

      So is the meaningless charge that "AMA doctors don't understand health".

      Do not confuse the slogans of quackery with the methods all physicians use to understand and help their patients as people.

    The relationship between "stress" and disease remains poorly understood. (All about stress: JAMA 267: 1244, 1992, for physiologists).

      In many animal models, stress seems to help cause specific diseases, but in many others, it seems to help prevent specific diseases.

      All the serious recent work I could find has utterly failed to confirm the once-fashionable claims that certain "stressful life-events" tend to precede the appearance or recurrence of clinical diseases apart from the psychiatric syndromes. For example, see J. Inf. Dis. 178S1:S67, 1998 (zoster), Arch. Int. Med. 159: 2430, 1999 (genital herpes), Cancer 77: 1089, 1996 and Cancer 79: 105, 1996 and Br. Med. J. 304: 1078, 1992 and Br. Med. J. 319: 1027,1999 (breast cancer); Arch. Gen. Psych. 49: 396, 1992 and Am. J. Psych. 148: 733, 1991 (AIDS); Am. J. Card. 68: 1171, 1991 (coronary disease); Ann. Int. Med. 114: 381, 1991 and Gut 31: 179, 1990 inflammatory bowel disease). The one exception is multiple sclerosis, where a relationship has long been clear (Br. Med. J. 327: 646, 2003). Also discredited is the old "holistic" claim that serious disease and death are more likely after bereavement and so forth (J. Behav. Med. 13: 263, 1990). By the mid-1990's serious researched had stopped even looking at this stuff.

      You may hear that people unconsciously choose particular diseases to "symbolize their emotional conflicts". Patients are blamed for being sick because they have unhealthy attitudes. In some circles (both "liberal-holistic" and "conservative-spiritual"), people scapegoat the sick. This is cruel, and it is also groundless (NEJM 312: 1570, 1985).

    Be aware of the ways in which lifestyle affects disease, and the effect of the disease and its treatment on the "whole patient" and his or her associates. But be realistic.

      Your patient has other problems besides the disease. It may help if you know what these are, but there is seldom much you can do about them.

      You may run into "religious conservatives" who contend that unusual sickness means unusual wickedness, and "if you were really sorry for your sin, you would walk out healed", etc. It's hard to argue with these folks, but I'm not aware of any reason to think this is true. And following Job, I prefer incomplete answers to the obviously-wrong answers of uncharitable ignorance. See also Luke, "If a tower falls on you and kills you, does that mean you were more wicked than the next person?" "No."

      A school of pop psychology (popular with both left-wingers and right-wingers, it seems to have peaked in the late 1980's, but is still with us) emphasizes "everyone is an addict of some kind and is either in recovery or in denial", "you cannot begin to solve the problems of others until you have solved your own", and "the process of recovery is never finished". Only an ideologue would consider these to be better than half-truths.

      No reasonable person would deny the importance of lifestyle in several common diseases, and the importance of attitude and participation in some situations faced by sick people. But be aware that many of your patients who have non-lifestyle-related diseases are being told they are "responsible", "have bad attitudes", etc., etc.

      I note with some satisfaction an increasing use of the compound word "self-empowerment" by today's trendoids. As far as I can tell, it means, "Quit sobbing, shut up, wise up, act smart, and make a life for yourself." Watch for even more of this, especially in view of diminishing public's indulgence for (and tolerance of) do-nothings and crybabies.

    Patients like to have the physician explain their diseases and procedures to them. They also like being given something to do to help in their treatment. They like to be treated courteously, and most of them like to be touched. If a physician does these things, patients will usually be satisfied with the overall care they have received.

    Catch-phrases of the "political correctness" movement (which peaked in the early 1990's) include "different abilities / differently-abled" for handicaps, and "challenged" instead of "sick".

      This led to some Alice-in-Wonderland litigation; for example, in some jurisdictions you cannot consider that being in a wheelchair is a worse outcome than being able to walk, because being in a wheelchair is "differently abled". I'd like to meet the left-wing nut, confined to a wheelchair because of a physician's error, who forgoes suing for damages, since he or she is now "differently abled".

      Likewise, "challenges" are issued to winners, not to losers. (Even immunologic "challenges" are administered to creatures known to have fought off infection before.) I cannot regard simply getting sick, especially from some unhealthy and unwholesome practice, as making somebody a winner.

      A word-search in 1993 showed these terms to be common in the allied-health literature, but non-existent in writings intended for physicians.

      The Americans with Disabilities Act has made a level playing-field for companies wishing to hire the handicapped. It has also led to some bizarre law. There are some the-sky's-the-limit entitlements. And it only applies to disabled people. For example, if you have cystic fibrosis (a real disability) but can do a particular job, they cannot fire you for it, and have to make reasonable accommodations if you want to apply for the job. However, if you are fired by some moron for carrying the gene (this has happened), you have no legal recourse, and your rights have not been violated, because you are not disabled.

    Today, "medical ethics" is a growth industry that pays extremely well (i.e., protection from lawsuits; Pediatrics 93: 310, 1994).

      It was also obvious to this writer, when he was in training, that opposition by other physicians to discontinuing heroic therapy was motivated, at least in part, by economic incentives. (Yeah, there will never be a health-care reimbursement system without perverse incentives.) Remember this the next time somebody's "awful ethical dilemma" seems incredibly silly.

      Today's ethicists talk about "futility" (JAMA 281: 937, 1999) as if it were a new scientific discovery, instead of just the plain truth that there are problems you can't solve despite massive effort and money. (Cynics: The "futility movement" coincided with changes in reimbursement plans for physicians and hospitals which meant that they would lose, rather than make, money when families insisted on "doing everything" for their dying loved one....) We even hear about something "beyond futility", i.e., disability and death with dignity (JAMA 287: 2253, 2002) and comfort.

FINAL NOTE

    Pathology is the scientific knowledge that will enable you to find and treat disease effectively. Don't be discouraged! There's plenty you can do!-- ERF


Appendix I

A VERY SHORT HISTORY OF PATHOLOGY

Welcome to the introductory Pathology course. Most of you are undergraduate medical students. In this course you will learn the essential facts about human disease, so that you will be able to practice honest medicine.

Ideas about disease have changed during human history. People have thought about sickness as magical and mysterious, as abnormalities of whole persons, as abnormalities of individual organs, as abnormalities of cells, and as abnormalities of molecules.

Primitive people believe diseases are caused by gods and spirits. Diseases occur because people sin beyond the community standards, break taboos, or are bewitched. Primitive people treat diseases by praying, confessing their sins, and acting out magical ceremonies. In many cultures, the patient must show unquestioning faith, or the gods will be displeased and the patient will suffer. Most cultures also have some naturalistic ideas about disease. So primitive people also treat sick people by putting things into any and all body orifices, or even by creating new body orifices.

The ancient Egyptians made around 700,000,000 mummies. They took the organs out of the dead people and preserved them. Oddly, we have no record that Egyptian doctors ever examined their former patients' insides. They made some notes on practical therapeutics, but most of the surviving Egyptian medical literature is occult nonsense. One evil spirit is called "Mr. Pus-Friend, Cancer-Brother", etc.

The ancient Greek medical texts never mention supernatural causes of disease. The ancient Greeks had no concept of the real mechanics of disease, beyond observations of wounds, tumors, "swellings", etc. The best-known physician of ancient Greece was Dr. Hippocrates (460-377 BC). He and his students believed all diseases were processes that involved entire persons. Dr. Hippocrates sometimes tried to explain disease in terms of the traditional doctrine of four humors (blood, phlegm, yellow bile, black bile.) Disease is caused by imbalances of the four humors ("bad blendings," "dyscrasias") within the whole person. Disease was never localized to one part of the body. All this was wrong, but Dr. Hippocrates was no dogmatizer and the "four humors" myth probably did his patients no harm.

Hippocrates
NIH photo


Dr. Hippocrates was really an empiricist. He taught his students to carefully observe patients and watch what happened to them as they were treated. Dr. Hippocrates proved that sick people can be examined, their diseases classified, a diagnosis made for each, a prognosis established, and the patient treated intelligently. Although the Greeks understood almost nothing about real disease processes, they did discover what treatments helped for different patients. But except for minor surgery, they had no specific remedies for specific diseases. The Greeks cured almost nobody. Dr. Hippocrates is most famous for institutionalizing the high ideals of medical ethics. The Hippocratic oath made medicine a sacred calling rather than just a way of making a living. Hippocrates emphasized that some diseases are not treatable and that it is a credit to the physician to be candid about this. Two Alexandrian physicians did autopsies. Dr. Herophilus (335-280 BC) to do the first descriptions of cadaver dissection, and Dr. Eristratos (310-250) to correlate organ changes with diseases (ascites with cirrhosis, etc.) Their work had no real impact on the understanding of disease. They tried to correlate their findings with the clinical pictures with some success, but they had no influence on prevailing dogmas.

Dr. Cornelius Celsus (first century AD) described medical practice in his time in De Medicina. This book includes descriptions of heart disease and mental illness, and the four classic signs of inflammation.

Dr. Claudius Galen (130-200 AD), another Roman, began his career as the government physician to the gladiators. A careful observer, Dr. Galen soon became a famous physician, writer and lecturer. He discovered and explained several anatomic structures, including the recurrent laryngeal nerve, which he named "Galen's nerve." He wrote up some amazing experiments he did on living animals, and he published long lists of the rich and famous people who attended his lectures.

Galen
NIH photo


Dr. Galen dissected Barbary monkeys instead of humans. His mistakes included the five-lobed human liver, the two common bile ducts, and the holes where the blood goes through the septum of the heart. Dr. Galen's work remained the absolute authority until time of Dr. Vesalius. At anatomy demonstrations in the middle ages, the learned anatomy professor read out loud from Galen while the lowly morgue attendant cut on the body. If the morgue attendant found something that was not in "Galen", the professor ignored it. So there was exactly no progress in anatomy or anatomic pathology.

Dr. Celsus and Dr. Galen knew how inflammation and cancer looked and acted, and they emphasized patterns of symptoms and signs. For lack of any better theory of pathology, both these Roman doctors subscribed to the "four humors" idea of Dr. Hippocrates. Dr. Galen was also an amateur pagan philosopher and some of these writings survive too. He respected his Jewish and Christian neighbors, and was opposed to the persecutions. Like Dr. Hippocrates, Dr. Celsus and Dr. Galen had no concept of organ pathology, and they probably cured nobody.

Neither Dr. Hippocrates nor Dr. Galen ever did an autopsy (at least lawfully). Ancient and medieval superstition prohibited opening a dead body. Pathologic anatomy was limited to observing war wounds, bone injuries, skin diseases and a few clinical signs. In the middle ages, the Moslem world produced the best physicians. They were excellent observers of the living, but did not do autopsies. It took special permission from the pope to allow Dr. Mondino de Luzzi to perform an autopsy in front of an audience; this took place in Bologna in 1316. The autopsy (necropsy, post-mortem exam, "post") became popular only after Dr. Vesalius's anatomic work (1543). People realized that they could learn about the world by observing it, instead of reading old books.

When autopsies became legal, early investigators made many discoveries that offered new understandings of old diseases, but nobody understood essential diseases processes. As Dr. Galen and humoralism lost popularity, new fad theories emerged to explain all disease. In countries where it was legal to teach the existence of atoms, methodist physicians attributed all disease to changes in distances between atoms. In countries where atomic theory was still banned for ideological reasons (too unspiritual), pneumatist (vitalist) physicians blamed disease on the spiritual forces that controlled physiologic processes.

All previous anatomic pathology was superseded in 1761 by Dr. John Morgagni, an Italian. He called his charming series of 700 autopsies The Seats and Causes of Disease, Investigated by Anatomy. Written at age 78, it summed up a lifetime's experience and is still a great read. On the evidence, Dr. Morgagni was a genuinely good human being and was among the most beloved people of his era. Thanks to his work, all disease was now recognized as disease of organs, and disease "sat" in different organs in different patients. Dr. Morgagni meticulously related his patients' symptoms to their diseased organs, making the first clinico-pathologic correlations. This was real progress, but Dr. Morgagni had no real idea of how disease in one organ caused malfunction in another organ, or even what disease is. Since every major organ has one vein, Dr. Morgagni's students developed the next fad theory. All disease was due to phlebitis, inflammation of the vein draining the organ.

Morgagni
NIH photo


Dr. Karl Rokitansky of Vienna was the next great autopsy pathologist. He wrote the Handbook of General Pathologic Anatomy (1846), and in his day was the world's most famous pathologist. Vienna law decreed that everybody who died got autopsied by him. He did over 30,000 autopsies personally. Dr. Rokitansky was a colleague of Dr. Joseph Skoda, the world's most famous clinical diagnostician. In the morning, Dr. Skoda taught all the Viennese medical students on the wards and tried to make diagnoses on the patients who were still alive. In the afternoon, everybody went downstairs to see Dr. Rokitansky's autopsies on the dead patients and find out whether Dr. Skoda had been right. Thus, Dr. Rokitansky performed the most important function of the medical pathologist, relating clinical signs and symptoms to pathologic anatomy, and correlating function and structure. The medical students handled all the fresh organs without gloves and then go deliver babies without washing their hands. This was unhealthy, but it continued until a young instructor named Dr. Ignatius Semmelweiss introduced mandatory hand-washing. But that's another story.

Semmelweiss
NIH photo


Dr. Rokitansky and Dr. Skoda agreed that the medical therapeutics of their era had little to offer. (They were right.) Dr. Skoda's motto was "Forget treatment, the diagnosis is everything". They called this approach therapeutic nihilism. Dr. Skoda the clinician and Dr. Rokitansky the pathologist were brilliant, but nobody really had any idea what caused most disease. They didn't even know about germs. Dr. Rokitansky came up with a theory to explain all disease as crasias and dyscrasias. These caused the non-cellular ground substance to produce new defective cells.

Rokitansky
NIH photo


Rokitansky
NIH photo


Skoda
NIH photo


Dr. Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902) is the greatest pathologist of all time. Dr. Virchow was a German, a tiny man, almost a dwarf. Dr. Virchow started as a junior autopsy pathologist working for the German government at the University of Berlin. He liked to cut thin sections of diseased tissues with a razor, and look at them using the latest technology, the microscope. Dr. Virchow first achieved renown by discovering leukemia and myelin.

During the German revolution of 1848, there was a bad typhus epidemic. The government sent Dr. Virchow to find out what caused typhus. After investigating, he announced that typhus was caused by the conservative politicians, who had done nothing about poverty and overcrowding. The government fired him for saying this, and he continued his work elsewhere. Since Dr. Virchow's time, pathologists have remained interested in the social pathology that produces disease.

Dr. Virchow's book Cell Pathology (1858) is the basis for all modern pathology. Dr. Virchow worked out hypertrophy, hyperplasia, metaplasia, basic acute and chronic inflammation, granulomas, thrombosis, infarction, the nature of tumor growth and routes of tumor spread, and much more. If nobody tells you who discovered something, there is a good chance it was Dr. Virchow. Dr. Virchow established the principle that all cells come from pre-existing cells and he emphasized that all disease is disease of cells. Dr. Virchow's ideas were introduced within months of the two other great unifying principles of today's science, the periodic table of the elements and the common origin of living things. Although he described much of the anatomy of illness, and was not himself an experimentalist, Dr. Virchow realized the overriding importance of the new science of experimental physiology. He emphasized that morbid anatomy always reflects disordered pathophysiology.

Dr. Virchow became a member of the German senate, for his time an extreme liberal, even a pinko. Dr. Virchow liked to describe the body as a republic with every cell equal. Especially, Virchow despised notions of "race" as unscientific (Nature 427: 487, 2004). Chancellor Otto von Bismark hated Dr. Virchow so much that in 1865 he challenged him to a duel. Dr. Virchow accepted, and chose as the weapons two sausages. He stipulated that his sausage was to be a clean cooked sausage, and Bismark's sausage was to be loaded with trichinosis larvae, served raw, and eaten by Bismark.

Dr. Virchow became the world medical dictator and the arbiter of scientific controversy. He was usually right, but was skeptical about micro-organisms as causes of diseases. When Dr. Pasteur first demonstrated the streptococcus bacteria that cause human infections, Dr. Virchow was in the audience. Everybody looked to see what old Dr. Virchow would say about the new claim. Dr. Virchow nodded and walked out without saying anything, and Dr. Pasteur and his germs became official.

Virchow
NIH photo


Virchow
NIH photo


Virchow
NIH photo


Virchow
NIH photo


Virchow
Humor

Virchow
NIH photo


Dr. Louis Pasteur (late 1800's) was the first person to conquer diseases using the methods of laboratory science. He first solved the mystery of bad-tasting wine, then explained and prevented epidemic disease among silkworms, anthrax in sheep, and finally rabies in humans. Dr. Pasteur was a chemist and could not stand the sight of blood. He considered going to medical school but never went because he was terrified of having to watch an autopsy.

Pasteur
NIH photo


Cohnheim
NIH photo


Dr. Virchow's student Dr. Julius Cohnheim worked out much of the pathology of acute inflammation and of tuberculosis. Dr. Cohnheim's pupil, the flamboyant Dr. Paul Ehrlich, devised many of the stains still in use by pathologists.

Ehrlich
NIH photo


In the mid-twentieth century, pathologists really started thinking about diseases of molecules -- the molecular basis of disease. Progress in biochemistry unravelled the defects in inborn errors of metabolism. Dr. Linus Pauling (1949) worked out the physical chemistry of red cell sickling in sickle cell anemia. Every effective therapy today is the result of the laboratory study of disease.

Pauling
NIH photo


Today there is a new emphasis on disease as it involves whole persons. Today's most important diseases are lifestyle-related. Everyone recognizes the importance of habits in acquiring lung cancer, emphysema, heart disease, cirrhosis, and AIDS. Emotional factors influence other diseases, including high blood pressure, asthma, skin diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, and perhaps even cancer. Physicians are alert now to the ways in which illness affects a person's whole life, to the emotional needs of patients that cause them to seek medical attention, and to their spiritual needs, patient dignity, and their rights to make decisions about their own health care.

* In the twentieth century, two pathologists have distinguished themselves as spokespersons for human conscience, though you might not agree with one or both. Pathologist-turned-politician Salvador Allende took steps to turn Chile into his dream of a Marxist state. (Your lecturer considers this a misguided ideal.) Canadian John McCrae wrote the brilliant World War I lyric, In Flanders Fields. (Read it. Is it a militaristic poem, an anti-war poem, or both?)

In Medical Pathology, you will think about all these things at once. Pathology deals with abnormal gross and microscopic anatomy, abnormal biochemistry, and abnormal physiology. Disease involves molecules, cells, organs, whole persons, and groups of people. We are sensitive to all aspects of disease. We'll put everything together in this course.

                  -- Ed Friedlander, M.D.

Appendix II: "SCIENTIFIC MEDICINE"

Why do we say that today's medicine is "scientific"? You will often hear people say, "That's only a theory", "That's not proven", "Medical schools do not teach the true causes of disease", or "Seventy percent of what you're taught in medical school is proven wrong within ten years." To give thoughtful answers, you need to know the following definitions of things that make up the business of science:

Fact: (1) A simple observation anybody can make (for example, grass is green, my shoe is untied, it is raining today). (2) A simple observation that anybody could confirm with instruments, assuming the correctness of current theories (for example, valine is substituted for glutamic acid at position 6 of the hemoglobin beta-chains in sickle cell disease).

Conjecture: A guess, educated or not (for example, all disease is ultimately caused by pressure on the spinal nerves).

Hypothesis: An educated guess that someone plans to test honestly (for example, let's actually TEST that conjecture about spinal nerves).

Experiment: Something somebody does to test or refute a hypothesis, using adequate controls to prevent self-deception, and planning to share the data with others (for example, let's do a prospective, randomized study of the effects on asthma of chiropractic treatment vs. simple kindness and human warmth).

Theory: An idea that explains a large number of observations, and which is not contradicted by any observation (for example, the round earth, atoms and molecules, the circulation of the blood, evolution, interleukin 1 as mediator of cell-cell communication).

A theory can never be "proved", it can only be "not falsified". (* For example, I will discard everything I believe about human origins if a person with real credentials as a paleontologist discovers a single, modern-type human skull in a rock stratum found to be more than 1 million years old by contemporary methods.) A falsified theory must be modified or discarded.

Knowledge: Facts and successful theories. A theory that works well ceases to be knowledge when a more comprehensive, elegant, and/or successful theory replaces it (for example, Ptolemy's astronomy was replaced by that of Copernicus; Newton's physics was modified by Einstein's; Darwin's evolution has been clarified by the discovery of the mechanisms of mutation and the idea that the rate of change has varied tremendously.) According to most of today's thinkers, theories are guides to action. Hence improving knowledge does not make the previous theory "wrong", only "less true". Math and logic are probably also forms of knowledge, and there may be others (ask a philosopher, or even an artist or theologian).

Proof: Ask a lawyer, mathematician, logician or theologian what this means. We don't use it much in real science.

Science: This might best be defined as the process of advancing knowledge by doing experiments and developing theories. It is the most cut-throat of all human endeavors, and scientists thrive on finding flaws in one another's work. There are still plenty of gaps in human knowledge. However, I know of no major theory since Ptolemy's astronomy that has been considered "successful" that has subsequently been discarded.

Pseudoscience: Using the language and authority of science without using its methods. Recognize pseudoscience by:

    1. Unfalsifiable claims ("Nothing could convince me that Marxism isn't true"; "That's proof you are a racist"; "You weren't healed because you didn't have enough faith"; "If you say you were not abused sexually as a child, that proves you forgot"; "God planted the fossils to test our faith, and He also changed the major laws of science"; "If your behavior seems to differ from what Freudian theory would seem to predict, it's your Freudian defense mechanism"; "If a man is accused of rape without physical evidence and he passes the lie detector test, he is merely in denial." "Astrology fails only because our understanding of the tremendous influence of the stars is still incomplete"; "I now realize that you, too, are part of the conspiracy", etc.)

    2. Lack of original experiments and internal self-criticism;

    3. Citing old problems, errors, and doubts ("Piltdown man", issues during the discovery of HIV) to claim that current thinking is fundamentally flawed (I hope you understand the difference between empirical science and Euclid's built-from-the-bottom geometric theorems);

    4. Claims that "scientists are suppressing the truth", "government scientists are blind dogmatists", and "we are the true scientists";

    5. Appeals to the public based on half-truths (for example, "If lecithin is a component of myelin, then taking lecithin pills should help multiple sclerosis");

    6. Claims to be "loving" and "spiritual", and that "those other doctors and scientists are not";

    7. Unusual academic degrees (for example, "Metabolic Doctor" or "M.D.", awarded by a Tijuana enema parlor);

    8. Using "alternative theories" as the basis for a profitable business;

    9. Eagerness to "debate" honest scientists in the public media where they will lie wholesale, coupled with an extreme reluctance to testify in court under oath;

    10. The fact that when its proponents are asked to present experimental data, they complain of "lack of proper funding", or insist they will never "treat 'whole persons' as statistics", or cite the "Heisenberg uncertainty principle", "Godol's theorem", or "postmodernism" as proof that all experimentation is invalid;

    11. The fact that when its proponents are caught falsifying data or quotations (both widespread practices), they do not answer the charges but instead respond with vicious personal attacks.

    12. A quack may reasonably be defined as a pseudoscientist who is selling something, and a charlatan as a cynical pseudoscientist who knows he or she is deceiving the public.

Junk science is one step above pseudoscience. It's a term, mostly used by lawyers, for poor natural-science (old studies, bad studies, discredited studies; also statistics and tables out of context as in pseudoscience) used in arguments directed at the public. Real work is cited accurately, but very selectively and misleadingly. Much of this is obviously intentional by agitprop writers. Today's grown-ups are well-aware of this, and generally dismiss "new information about health risks" and "warnings of impending environmental catastrophes" as junk science.

Pseudoscience and junk science appeal to basic human emotions (i.e., people are all-too-eager to believe lies that make them feel intellectually or morally superior). The disinformation campaigns often make its proponents wealthy and exert a massive influence on public policy. If you check your bookstores, you will discover that the public buys much more pseudoscience and junk science than real science. The United States public currently spends more money on health frauds than the total funds (government and private) used for medical research. The Supreme Court's "Daubert" decision made it the judge's responsibility to keep junk science and pseudoscience out of the courtroom (thanks Mr. Justice Scalia).

Sub-science is my term for areas in which measurement is difficult and the subject matter is of great human importance. Ideology (i.e., emotionally-held, ill-founded beliefs that are contrary to common-sense) tends to dominate. Much of health-maintenance, psychology and education, and almost all of sociology, are obviously sub-science. Unfortunately, sub-science has an even greater influence on politics than does pseudoscience.

It is evidence of your own integrity that you have chosen scientific medicine. Your reward is that scientific knowledge gives you tremendous power to deal with the world as it really is. I know you'll all use this power to do good.

    -- ERF.


Appendix III: Principles of Biomedical Ethics

After Elkins, J. Med. Educ. 63: 294, 1988; see also Disease-A-Month Dec. 1993

Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.

          -- Salvor Hardin (Asimov's character)

I. HONESTY (TRUTH-TELLING)

    Hippocrates: It is your duty to lie when it is for the greater good of your patients.

    Immanuel Kant: We would want everyone to be honest.

    Henry Sidgwick: Patients often cannot endure the truth.

    Trend: Informed consent is now the norm; increased overall emphasis on honesty.

II. CONTRACT-KEEPING (PROMISE-KEEPING)

    Hippocrates: The health care provider has made a contract with God, promising to do good for sick people.

    Old Testament: Emphasis on covenant and faithfulness as the basis of relationships.

    Modern law: Contract for health care is a business arrangement.

    Trend: Health care workers repay society for their educations by doing good.

III. NON-MALEFICENCE (NOT DOING HARM)

    Buddhism: Early emphasis on 5 abstentions (from violence, sexual immorality, stealing, lying, alcohol-and-drugs), generosity, and the 4 social emotions (love, compassion, sympathetic joy, impartiality), as essential to the pursuit of saving wisdom; the tradition tends to look at a doer's motives and the effects of an action on everybody involved

    Hippocrates: "First do no harm"; forbade abortion, euthanasia, and sexual misconduct; required specialist referrals

    Thomas Aquinas: Principle of double effect (J. Med. Eth. 26: 204, 2000) allows a lesser harm for a greater good.

      "Uh... seems to me that this is what EVERYTHING is about...!" -- Ed.

    Modern era: Expect side effects and complications from powerful remedies.

    Trend: Focus on risk-benefit ratios to patient, cost-benefit ratios to society, quality of life concerns.

IV. JUSTICE

    Egalitarianism: Everyone has an equal right to health care.

    Karl Marx: Distribute care entirely on the basis of need.

    Distributive justice: Distribute care according to a person's need, effort, merit, and/or contribution to society, and/or to make up for past injustices to individuals and/or groups.

    Utilitarianism: Find some way to maximize private and public good.

    Socrates, David Hume: Justice is a difficult thing to define.

    Trends: Problems with allocation of scarce resources, especially providing inordinate amounts of care to certain small groups or those with lifestyle-related disease. This is the most impressive change I've seen in the "ethics" environment during my time as a physician, and I see it as a welcome retreat from both right-wing and left-wing ideology.

V. AUTONOMY (SELF-DETERMINATION)

    Immanuel Kant: Freedom of the will is a key to understanding morality.

    John Stuart Mill: It is hard to tell who is really acting freely.

    U.S. Founding Fathers: Inalienable rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

    Roe v. Wade: In essence, the government should stay out of metaphysical questions about which there is no consensus.

    Islamic cultures: Patients tend to regard the physician as God's mouthpiece, someone to be obeyed without your saying what you actually want. The idea of autonomy is alien, but physicians develop very close and loving relationships with entire families. Review: Hastings Center Report Nov-Dec. 2000.

    Minimalist ethics: Let nature take its course whenever possible.

    Trends: Informed consent, living wills, confidence-keeping; dominated medical ethics 1960-1980.

VI. BENEFICENCE (DOING GOOD)

    Confucianism / Asian feudalism: Right living is strictly defined in terms of rules of propriety in hierarchical dyadic relationships (see Aust. N.Z. J. Psych. 24: 510, 1990).

    Hippocrates: Health care provider's role is a holy calling to do good by directly helping others.

    Claudius Galen: Emphasis on compassion and competence.

    Rabbinic law: Preserving life overrides other laws and is a central principle of ethics

    Christianity: God's love for each individual is key to ethics.

      Uh, that tells you WHY but not WHAT... -- Ed.

    Reagan administration (early 1980's): Health care workers must preserve helpless life of any quality over wishes of parents or "good of society", but must also honor parents' religious objections to health care.

    Oregon: Spend public funds for health care where they will do the greatest good for the greatest number of deserving citizens. Don't treat when chances for a decent life are very slim. Make sure poor kids get immunizations and eyeglasses. Liver transplants may be available for children with biliary atresia. But if you ruined your liver by drinking alcohol and want a new one, pay for it yourself.

    Bush Administration (1992): The Oregon plan is unconstitutional because it discriminates against alcoholics, very small premature babies, and other handicapped.

    Clinton Administration (1993): The Oregon plan is acceptable.

    Trends: Beneficence, as classically defined, is usually rejected as "paternalism" in favor of the other principles. This is certain to change as the need for prioritizing becomes more acute.

VII. PREVENTING AND RELIEVING SUFFERING

    Cassell: The health care provider's role is to relieve suffering of all sorts, not to generate more (NEJM 306: 639, 1982) by prolonging agony and impoverishing families. Good reading.

    1990's: A few major countries legalized active euthanasia.

VIII. TWO OVER-ARCHING PHILOSOPHIC THEORIES FOR ALL OF ETHICS

    Formalism (nonconsequentialism): An action is right or wrong in-and-of itself. Most contemporary discussions of medical ethics (both "religious" and "secular") are formalist, which explains some of the characteristics of these discussions (i.e., fantasy; they degenerate almost immediately into shouting, pouting, and name-calling). A subcategory is virtues ethics: an action is right or wrong depending on whether the practitioner exhibits the philosopher's favorite virtue(s).

    Consequentialism: A particular action is right or wrong depending on what may reasonably be expected to result from that particular action. Consequentialists (utilitarians, pragmatists, silly-scenario folks, etc.) supposedly ignore individual imperatives for the "good of society". Consequentialism is at best an uncomfortable position for any health care provider, even in the managed care era.

CONCLUSION:

    The tough "medical ethics" questions are philosophical and perhaps spiritual, rather than strictly "medical" or "scientific". The law will surely continue to change. You may not reach all the same conclusions as other thoughtful people. However, these principles will serve as useful guides for your thinking, and to the ethical course of action, in the vast majority of cases.


Appendix IV
BLOOD GASES OVERSIMPLIFIED

INTRODUCTION

    In caring for sick patients in whom you suspect cardiac or pulmonary disease, you will frequently order blood gas determination.

    Arterial blood is collected in a special syringe and sent to the laboratory on ice for immediate analysis.

    Within a few minutes, you know the patient's arterial pH, PaO2, and PaCO2, and from these the lab calculates the arterial HCO3-, hemoglobin % saturation, and base excess.

      (Instruments that determine "electrolytes" on venous blood report the "total CO2". Because the pKa of H2CO3 is 6.1, "total CO2" closely approximates the venous or arterial HCO3- at any pH compatible with life. However, when you send arterial blood for arterial blood gases, you get the actual arterial HCO3-, calculated using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation.)

    Interpreting these numbers is tricky and depends on an understanding of basic physiology.

* NORMAL VALUES

    Arterial pH = 7.35-7.45

    Arterial PO2 = 80-110 mm Hg

    Arterial PCO2 = 32-48 mm Hg

    Arterial calculated HCO3- = 18-23 mEq/L

    Venous total CO2 = 22-26 mEq/L

CARBON DIOXIDE

    Most of the "carbon dioxide" in the blood is tied up as HCO3-, which is in equilibrium with H2CO3 and CO2 in the blood.

    No matter how sick a person gets, the alveolar walls remain permeable to carbon dioxide. Therefore, the entire "bicarbonate buffer system" is in equilibrium with the alveolar carbon dioxide content.

    Alveolar carbon dioxide content in turn depends on adequacy of pulmonary ventilation. ("How effectively is the lung getting rid of CO2 that isn't required for buffering the blood?")

      If pulmonary ventilation is decreased (decreased respiratory drive from drugs or in CNS disease or COPD, muscle weakness, restrictive lung disease, obstructed airways, or fluid in alveoli), there will be increased alveolar carbon dioxide content and thus increased arterial PCO2. Respiratory acidosis results.

        (Another cause of increased alveolar carbon dioxide content is increased carbon dioxide content of inspired air, i.e., rebreathing air using a paper bag. Respiratory compensation of metabolic alkalosis will also decrease pulmonary ventilation.)

      If pulmonary ventilation is increased (anxiety, hypoxia, fever), there will be decreased alveolar carbon dioxide content and thus decreased arterial PCO2. Respiratory alkalosis results.

        (Respiratory compensation of metabolic acidosis will also increase pulmonary ventilation.)

    In pH disturbances of respiratory origin, arterial HCO3- (as calculated in the blood gas report) and venous HCO3- (as approximated by the "total CO2" measured in the electrolyte panel) will be altered in the same direction as arterial PCO2, especially if metabolic (renal) compensation has occurred.

      The magnitude of this change, however, is never very great. Venous total CO2 less than 19 mEq/L generally indicates metabolic acidosis, and venous total CO2 greater than 30 generally indicates metabolic alkalosis.

    As you know, venous P CO2 is only about 6 mm Hg higher than arterial PCO2, and a right-to-left shunt through the lung will produce a negligible increase in arterial PCO2.

OXYGEN

    Because of the shape of the hemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve, normal hemoglobin is almost fully saturated when PaO2 is above 80 mm Hg.

      (Remember arterial PO2 is the measure of the small amount of oxygen in solution in the plasma, not the oxygen bound to hemoglobin. Increasing arterial PO2 above the range 80-100 is not going to significantly improve overall oxygenation of the blood. Conversely, a drop in PaO2 below 60 mm Hg is bad.)

    Unlike carbon dioxide, arterial PO2 depends on several factors. ("Are the alveoli being ventilated adequately and evenly, is all the right-sided cardiac output getting to the alveoli, and can oxygen diffuse through the alveolar-capillary membrane?")

      Decreased ventilation of alveoli results in decreased alveolar oxygen content.

        There may be decreased ventilation of all alveoli (drugs, CNS or muscle disease, restrictive lung disease, asthma, ARDS, pulmonary edema), or uneven ventilation (atelectasis, pneumonia, COPD, airways obstructed by secretions or tumor).

        Because venous PO2 is only a fraction of arterial PO2 (especially in sickness, where tissue oxygen requirements may be increased and cardiac output may be low), shunting of venous blood through poorly-ventilated alveoli will result in a great decrease in arterial PO2.

          (Perfusion without ventilation also results from right-to-left intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunts.)

        Remember that, in health, increasing alveolar ventilation does not greatly increase alveolar oxygen content.

          (Because inspired air is about 20% oxygen, alveolar oxygen content is increased about 1 mm Hg for every 5 mm Hg that alveolar carbon dioxide content is decreased. To increase alveolar oxygen content, have the patient breathe supplemental oxygen.)

      Even fairly mild thickening of the alveolar walls (pulmonary edema, ARDS, interstitial fibrosis, lymphangitic carcinomatosis) renders them relatively impermeable to oxygen ("diffusion barrier").

      If the problem is poor overall lung ventilation, PaO2 will drop and PaCO2 will rise noticeably. It is notoriously impossible to use blood gases, alone, to distinguish a right-to-left shunt (anatomic, physiologic) from too-thick alverolar septa.

REMEMBER:

    Dead space is the volume of ventilation that does not exchange with the blood.

      It includes anatomic dead space (large airways) and functional dead space (due to ventilation-perfusion mismatching, some of which is inevitable due to gravity.)

      Increased dead space is usually due to pulmonary embolus or decreased right-sided cardiac output (shock, pulmonary hypertension.)

      *The clinical dead-space equation:

Dead space ventilation / total ventilation = (PCO2 (arterial) - PCO2 (expired air))/PCO2 (arterial)

    Shunt fraction is the fraction of cardiac output that does not exchange with alveolar gas.

      Because there is uneven distribution of ventilation in almost all lung disease, there is always an increase in shunt fraction.

      Formulas to calculate the shunt fraction exist.

    Base excess is a measure of the metabolic (i.e., nonrespiratory) component of a pH disturbance.

      A positive base excess indicates the degree of metabolic alkalosis. A negative base excess indicates the degree of metabolic acidosis.

      Base excess is calculated from the blood gases by a complicated formula (i.e., using a nomogram or calculator.)


Appendix V
ELECTROLYTES OVERSIMPLIFIED

INTRODUCTION

    The principal extracellular cation is sodium; the principal extracellular anions are bicarbonate, chloride, and proteins.

    The principal intracellular cation is potassium; the principal intracellular anions are phosphates and proteins.

    Most of the body's calcium is extracellular; most of the body's magnesium is intracellular.

    Of course, all the above are electrolytes. But when you "order electrolytes on a patient", you are asking for serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate ("total CO2").

    Remember that electrolytes are generally measured as milliequivalents per liter (meq/L). Remember also that an "equivalent" is a mole of charge.

      Thus, a milliequivalent of univalent ions (sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate) is a millimole of these ions.

      And a milliequivalent of divalent ions (calcium, magnesium) is half a millimole of these ions.

      And since, around physiologic pH, phosphate anion is a mixture of H2PO4-1 and HPO4-2, it is very inconvenient to talk about milliequivalents of phosphate anion. That value would even be different at different pH values.

      As a result, only the univalent ions are generally reported in meq/L.

    Very generally, here is what an "electrolyte panel" tells you:

      Sodium tells you if the patient is dehydrated or overhydrated.

      Potassium tells you the patient's serum potassium status. (This must be kept as close to normal as possible.)

      Bicarbonate tells you if the patient has metabolic acidosis or alkalosis.

      Chloride is provided so that you can calculate whether the patient has an abnormally high anion gap.

    Indications for ordering serum electrolytes are very broad.

      All fluid therapy on seriously ill patients is guided by monitoring serum electrolytes. (You will learn a great deal about this during your rotations.)

      Patients on digitalis and/or diuretics, with renal failure, or with extensive tissue injury especially need to have their potassium levels watched.

      Patients who are post-surgical, febrile, dehydrated, unconscious, having seizures, and many others all need to have "electrolytes" checked.

* NORMAL RANGES

    Sodium = 136-145 meq/L

    Potassium = 3.5-5.0 meq/L

    Chloride = 96-106 meq/L

    Bicarbonate = 24-30 meq/L ("total carbon dioxide content")

    Anion gap = 8-16 meq/L

SERUM OSMOLALITY

    Before we look more closely at sodium and potassium, here is a formula for the bedside calculation of serum osmolality.

      glucose urea nitrogen

    Serum osmolality = (2 x sodium) + (glucose/3) + (urea nitrogen / 20)

      (Variations on this formula exist; this version is fine.)

    Serum osmolality is one of the most tightly regulated physiologic parameters. Normal range is 275-295, lower in babies.

      The lab can measure it directly by freezing point depression, though the above formula is good so long as the serum is not loaded with ethanol, mannitol, ketoacids, etc.

    Serum osmolality is a better measure of water depletion or water overload than serum sodium. See below.

SERUM SODIUM

    Increased serum sodium is, for practical purposes, due only to dehydration. (A possible exception would be a psychotic or child abuse victim with table salt intoxication.)

      Inability to replace water loss due to burns, sweating, drainage; inability to replace respiratory, urinary, and fecal losses (babies, the severely disabled.)

      Diabetes insipidus (posterior pituitary disease, renal collecting tubule disease)

      Osmotic diuresis due to hyperglycemia (leading to hyperosmolar nonketotic diabetic coma), ketoacidosis, mannitol administration, some patients with renal failure.

      Rarely, hyperaldosteronism can cause actual hypernatremia. Usually there is either a corresponding increase in plasma volume (drinking fountain, mild edema results) or (most often) ANF (atriopeptin) clears water and sodium.

      Dehydration from insufficient water intake is common in the very-sick, especially before they get to the hospital. "Breast-milk-only" zealots who had lactation failure and let their babies become severely sick as a result: AJFMP 19: 19, 1998.

    Decreased serum sodium

      This is a very common problem in clinical medicine.

        The danger is that decreased serum osmolality will result in cerebral edema. Respiratory arrest and/or brain damage can and do occur (Br. Med. J. 304: 1218, 1992).

      Before you decide to treat a low serum sodium, be sure it is not just the result of dilution by some other osmotically active substance.

        Check the urea ("BUN") and glucose (these values come with many "electrolyte profiles") and calculate the approximate osmolality using the formula.

        Remember ethanol, * M-proteins, mannitol, and triglycerides (* the last is important if the level is above 2000 mg/dL, normal is a tenth that) can also depress the sodium level while osmolality remains normal.

        If in doubt, have the lab check the serum osmolality.

      "Genuine" low sodium (synonymous, in practice, with low serum osmolality) will be found to be due to renal sodium wasting, extra-renal sodium wasting, water overload, inappropriate hADH, or cachexia.

        In most cases, it is helpful to check the urine sodium to decide which mechanism is operating.

        Remember that, in health, urinary sodium output corresponds to dietary intake.

      Renal sodium wasting: diuretic therapy (and diuretic abuse, currently popular), Addison's disease, some renal interstitial disease.

        Urine sodium is usually above 20 meq/L in these disorders.

      Extra-renal sodium wasting: losses because of vomiting, diarrhea, suction, surgical drains, burns, or heavy sweating. In each case, hyponatremia develops when water replacement occurs!

        Urine sodium is usually below 10 meq/L in these disorders

      Water overload is seen in psychogenic water drinking, overzealous IV therapy with "D5/W" or the like, and in generalized edema and ascites (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome.)

        In generalized edema, the effective circulating blood volume is low. The kidneys are unable to dispose of all the water the patient drinks. There may also be increased hADH, or the patient may have been receiving a sodium-wasting diuretic. These factors override the effects of secondary aldosteronism, and result in a low serum sodium.

        Urine sodium is usually below 10 meq/L in these disorders.

      Syndrome of inappropriate hADH: a special cause of water overload. It may be due to oat cell carcinoma of the lung, porphyria, * CNS disease, * chlorpropamide, TB, or other causes (even old age -- see Ann. Int. Med. 99: 185, 1983.)

        Urine sodium is usually above 20 meq/L in "SIADH."

        Criteria exist for the diagnosis of this problem; unfortunately, hADH assays are not readily available. Essential features are:

        • low serum sodium, with urine more concentrated than serum
        • adequate hydration (though these patients are not edematous)
        • failure of serum sodium to respond as expected to administration of sodium chloride
        • return of serum sodium to more normal values upon restriction of water intake (making the "inappropriate" hADH level "appropriate.")

      Cachexia results in serum sodium levels that are often somewhat low and which cannot be corrected by fluid restriction or sodium chloride administration.

        Probably this results from the loss of intracellular protein anions, so that intracellular osmolality (which must equal extracellular osmolality) becomes low.

        This is also called the "reset osmostat syndrome" or the "tired cell syndrome."

      BEWARE: Correct lower serum sodium slowly, or risk central pontine myelinolysis!

SERUM POTASSIUM

    Increased serum potassium:

      Renal failure is by far the commonest cause of increased serum potassium.

      Other causes:

      • iatrogenic overadministration of potassium supplements
      • dehydration (potassium follows water out of cells)
      • lack of mineralocorticoids (Addison's disease, * spironolactone, * inadequate renin response)
      • massive hemolysis, GI bleeding, or tissue necrosis (rare, seen most often in chemotherapy of certain white cell neoplasms)

      Artifactual: Unfortunately very common! (see Br. Med. J. 291: 890, 1985)

      • tourniquet and fist-pumping (up to 2.0 meq/L; NEJM 332: 1290, 1990)
      • hemolysis (serum will be pale-pink when potassium is 0.1 meq/L too high; lysis of 1% of red cells raises potassium 1.0 meq/L).
      • thrombocytosis (over 500,000 platelets/cu mm releases more potassium than the normal value takes into account)
      • refrigeration (enzymes that keep potassium inside red cells are inhibited in the cold)
      • marked leukocytosis (leukemia with WBC over 100,000)

    Decreased serum potassium: (Hosp. Pract. 22(1): 53, Jan. 15, 1987)

      • Diuretics (* thiazides, * furosemide, etc.)
      • Aldosteronism (* Conn's syndrome, * cirrhosis)
      • Diarrhea (especially with longstanding, as in chronic laxative abuse or * villous adenoma of the colon)
      • Iatrogenic (forgetting to administer supplemental potassium when needed, especially when treating diabetic ketoacidosis as potassium follows glucose into the cells)
      • Metabolic alkalosis both causes and result from hypokalemia, as sodium is exchanged for both protons and potassium in the kidney and elsewhere.
      • *Other causes include familial hypokalemic periodic paralysis, hereditary potassium-wasting tubulopathies (Arch. Int. Med. 143: 1534, 1983).

METABOLIC ACIDOSIS

    Causes:

      Loss of fixed base: renal tubular acidosis (inability of the proximal tubule to reabsorb bicarbonate normally), drainage of pancreatic fluid (rich in bicarbonate), diarrhea (rich in bicarbonate), Addison's disease (failure to reabsorb sodium in the distal tubule, thus retaining protons instead).

        Each of these will result in hyperchloremic acidosis. (Why?)

        Learn the types of renal tubular acidosis:

          RTA type 1 ("Distal"): distal tubule has trouble excreting protons, or protons leak back in the collecting ducts

            There is secondary hypercalciuria, with rickets, osteomalacia, kidney stones.

          RTA type 2 ("Proximal"): proximal tubule has trouble reabsorbing bicarbonate

            There is also potassium wasting.

          RTA type 3: combination of 1 & 2, rare

          RTA type 4: the kidney fails to produce renin (and therefore aldosterone) when it is required.

            This is very common in patients with renal microvascular disease (diabetes, hypertension).

            The acidosis is worst in hyperkalemia, since potassium suppresses the production of ammonia.

      Abnormal presence of a nonvolatile acid: lactic acidosis, diabetic ketoacidosis (acetoacetic acid, beta-hydroxybutyric acid), uremia (sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, others), aspirin poisoning (salicylic acid), ethylene glycol poisoning (oxalic acid), methanol poisoning (formic acid.)

        Each of these will result in an increased anion gap.

        The anion gap, as usually defined, is sodium minus chloride minus bicarbonate. The normal value is 8-16 meq/L. (Why?)

        Always calculate the anion gap when you encounter metabolic acidosis!

METABOLIC ALKALOSIS

    Causes:

      Loss of fixed acid: vomiting, nasogastric suction, hyperaldosteronism (excess reabsorption of sodium in the distal tubule, thus losing protons instead -- Conn's syndrome, Cushing's syndrome, licorice toxicity).

      Addition of fixed base: bicarbonate administration, milk-alkali syndrome

        Neither of these mechanisms results in a metabolic alkalosis that can be reversed by saline administration, i.e., they produce "chloride nonresponsive metabolic alkalosis."

      Water lack requiring renal bicarbonate retention: dehydration from most causes (invalidism, diarrhea, laxative abuse, diuretics, suction), often with hypokalemia (lack of potassium to exchange for reabsorbed sodium in the nephron forces loss of protons.)

        The kidney is forced, in severe dehydration, to retain sodium bicarbonate in order to retain water.

        This type of metabolic alkalosis can often be reversed by saline administration, i.e., it is "chloride responsive metabolic alkalosis."

QUESTION: What effect would very low serum albumin (as in cirrhosis or the nephrotic syndrome) have on calculated anion gap? What effect would a cationic M-protein have?

FUTURE FORENSIC PATHOLOGISTS: Think the death was due to an electrolyte / glucose / alcohol problem without obvious anatomic correlates? Check the chemistry of the vitreous humor, which for many, many hours closely mimics the blood chemistry over the few days prior to death.

    Vitreous potassium: Increases linearly by 0.17 mEq/L per hour pretty much independent of environment, supposedly. Don't rely on this completely.

    Vitreous EtOH: around 90% of blood EtOH, stays fairly steady after death

    BUN / creatinine: change very little after death, and closely reflect levels on the day prior to death

    Na+, Ca++, Mg++: reflect levels on the day prior to death

    Good reading: Tedeschi's Forensic Path, Ch. 45.


Appendix VI
Reference Ranges for Common Lab Tests
and Physiological Parameters

NOTE: These are commonly-cited ranges. "Normal" depends on the technique, the lab, and the population.

SYSTEMIC BLOOD PRESSURE: Around 120/80 mmHg

PULMONARY BLOOD PRESSURE: Around 25/7 mmHg

PULMONARY VENOUS PRESSURE: ("wedge pressure"): 1-5 mmHg

CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE: -5 to 10 mmHg

PORTAL VENOUS PRESSURE: 10 mmHg

WHITE CELL COUNT... 4.8-10.8 x 103

RED CELL COUNT... Men 4.7-6.1 x 106; Women 4.2-5.4 x 106

HEMOGLOBIN

    Men 14-18 gm/dL

    Women 12-16 gm/dL

MEAN CORPUSCULAR VOLUME

    Men 80-94 fL

    Women 81-99 fL

    NOTE: Pay less attention to hematocrit, MCH, and MCHC; these are derived values.

RED CELL SIZE DISTRIBUTION WIDTH... 11.5-14.5

PLATELET COUNT ... 130-400 x 103

MEAN PLATELET VOLUME ... 7.4-10.4 fL

ABSOLUTE LYMPHOCYTE COUNT ... 1.2-3.4 x 103 (3.0-7.0 x 103 or so for kids)

ABSOLUTE MONOCYTE COUNT ... 0.11-0.59 x 103

ABSOLUTE GRANULOCYTE COUNT ... 1.8-6.5 x 103

Almost always, almost all of these are neutrophils. The large majority of these should be mature forms, not bands.

ABSOLUTE EOSINOPHIL COUNT... less than or equal to 400

SERUM SODIUM ... 135-153 mEq/L

SERUM POTASSIUM ... 3.5-5.3 MEq/L

SERUM CHLORIDE ... 95-105 mEq/L

SERUM BICARBONATE ... 24-31 mEq/L

SERUM GLUCOSE ... 70-110 mg/dL fasting

SERUM UREA NITROGEN (BUN) ... 5-25 mg/dL

    Future doctors: Don't call it "bun" like from the bakery, or the patient will think you are referring to his or her gluteus maximus.

SERUM CREATININE ... 0.5-1.4 mg/dL

SERUM CALCIUM ... 8.7-10.7 mg/dL

SERUM MAGNESIUM ... 1.6-2.4 mg/dL

SERUM PHOSPHORUS ... 2.6-4.9 mg/dL

SERUM URIC ACID ... 2.5-9.2 mg/dL

SERUM CHOLESTEROL... Decision Level 200 mg/dL

SERUM TRIGLYCERIDES ... 30-200 mg/dL fasting (a dubious "normal range")

TOTAL PROTEIN ... 6.1-8.0 gm/dL

ALBUMIN ... 3.5-4.9 gm/dL

TOTAL BILIRUBIN ... 0.0-1.2 mg/dL

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ... 37-107 U/L

CREATINE KINASE (CK, CPK) ... 61-224 U/L

CPK isoenzymes to remember...

    MM = CK3 :Think skeletal muscle

    MB = CK2 :Think cardiac muscle

    BB = CK1 :"Brain enzyme", but you'll seldom see it

LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE (LD, LDH) 94-172 U/L

LDH isoenzymes to remember...

    1 :Heart, kidney, red cells

    5 :Skeletal muscle, liver

GLUTAMATE OXALOACETIC TRANSAMINASE (GOT, SGOT, AST) ... 12-45 U/L

GLUTAMATE PYRUVATE TRANSAMINASE (GPT, SGPT, ALT) ... 7-40 U/L

RETICULOCYTE COUNT... 0.5-1.5%

DIRECT COOMBS TEST... NEGATIVE

FLUORESCENT ANA... less than or equal to 1:20


Appendix VII
CLASSICAL ROOTS

annulus... little ring anser... goose acanth... spine, prickle
aceto... vinegar acou... hear acro... extremity, tip, sharp
actin... ray, beam acu... sharp, abrupt, sudden adeno... gland
adipo... fat aero... air (a)esth... perception
agogue... leader agon... contest, struggle ala... wing
alb... white algo... pain alien... stranger, strange
allelo... one another, mutual amauros... blind am(o)eb... constantly changing
ambi/amph... both sides ambly... dim, faint amnio... amnion, "bowl"
amylo... starch andro... male angio... vessel (blood, bile)
ankyl... bent, crooked; a joint locked in one position anthem... flower anthrac... black
anthro... man / human aort... aorta aphro... froth, sexual love
aqu... water arachn... spider, spiderweb archo... ancient, beginning
argy... silver, shiny artero... artery (as opposed to vein) arthro... joint
artic... little joint asthm... panting, short breaths athero... gruel
atri... entry chamber axilla... armpit axo... center, axis
aud... hear aur... hear aus... hear
auto... self aux... make grow azo... nitrogen
bac(t)... rod ball... throw balano... acorn, glans
blast... sprout blenno... snot bleph... eyelid
bol... throw brachi... arm brady... slow
branch... gill bronch... bronchus bucc... cheek (inside)
burs... bursa, purse caes... cut deep c(h)ord... notochord
c(o)ele... rupture carpo... wrist calci... limestone
calco... heel, spur calyc... cup campy... bend
canc... crab capo... head, expanded part centr... center
carbo... charcoal, carbon carcin... crab carcinoma... cancer from epithelium
card... heart, heart-shape carot... great neck arteries carpo... wrist
caus... burn centesis... puncture centr... center
cep(h)... head, expanded part cephal... head cept... seize, take
cereb(r)... brain cervic... neck ch(e)ir... hand
chemo... chemistry chlor... light green chol(e)... bile
chondr... cartilage; grain chorea... dance chori... chorionic membrane
chrom... color chron... time, long time chyle... digested food juice
cide... killing, "falling" cise... cut deep cili... eyelash
cion... uvula clast... break claustr... barrier
cleido... collarbone, key clino... bed clivus... slope
coagul... coagulate, clot coccus... berry coccyx... cuckoo, cuckoo bill
collic... hill collo... glue collus... neck
conios... dust cond... hard knob core... dolly, pupil (of eye)
cori... leather corn... horn cox(a)... hip
corp... physical body cre(s)c... grow cribi / cribri... sieve
crine... secretion ("separation") cubit... elbow cubo... lay down
cule... little culpo... vagina cuneo... wedge
cutis... skin cyan... dark blue cycl... circle, wheel
cysto... urinary bladder cyto... cell dacr... tear (from the eye)
dacty... finger demos... people dens... tooth
dent... tooth derm... skin desm... harden, bind together
desis... binding desmo... hard dextro... right-sided
diadocho... succeed, take over didym... twin digi(t)... finger, toe
diphth... leathery membrane docho... cup, container drepan... sickle
dromo... running a race; course duc,...duct lead, guide dynia... pain
echin... spiny echo... echo ectasia... dilatation
edem(a)... excess tissue fluid embol... bottle stopper embryo... embryo, fetus
em(ia)... blood enceph... brain enchyme... filling, installation
entero... intestine ergo... work erythro... red
esthesia... perception f(a)eco... feces, refuse fac... make, build, do, perform
facie... face, countenance, looks fasc... bundle, fascia fec... make, build, do, perform
fer... carrying, bearing fibr... fibrous fic... make, build, do, perform
fis,...fid split, cleave, divide flagel... whip flav... yellow
flat... blow flect... bend flex... bend
fora/foro... make a hole fornic... arch fract... break into pieces
frag... break into pieces fring... break into pieces fuge... flee
fun... melt, pour fus... melt, pour gala(k)... milk
gam(y)... marry gangl... knot gangr... gangrene, gnawing sore
galact... milk gastr... stomach, belly gemin... twin
gen... become, beget, produce genesis... origin genu... knee
ger... old age gest... bring forth, produce glans... acorn
gleno... shoulder gli(o)... glial cells, literally "glue" glob... sphere, ball, round body
glomer... tuft gloss... tongue glute... buttocks
gnatho... jaw gnosis... know gogue... lead
gono... offspring, product, seed, semen gonio... angle gracile... slender
gram... record gran... grain graph... writing, scratching
gryph... claw gynec... female (h)(a)em... blood
habeo... to hold, habit, general state of halluc... big toe helic... spiral
helm... worm hermaphro... male and female in one body hepat... liver
hernia... rupture, hernia hidr... sweat hippo... horse
histo... tissue, web, cloth hy(a)l... glass, primitive material hydatid... water drop
hydro... water hypno... sleep hystero... uterus
iatric... healing iatro... physician ichth... fish
idio... self, personal, private inguin... part of body from groin to hip insul... island
irid... rainbow, bright-color circle ischi... hip joint islet... island
ject... throw, hurl jejun... hungry junc... join together
jug... join together jux... join together kera... horny
kerato... skin surface, cornea, horn kine... set in motion kyn... dog
lachry... tear (from the eye) labio... lip lacto... milk
lal... babble, talk latero... side lecith... egg yolk
leiomyo... smooth muscle lein... spleen lens... lentil
lepros... rough and rotting off lepto... thin, fine, slender leuco... white
levo... left-sided liga(t)... bind together, bandage ling... tongue
lith... stone lumbo... lower back, loin lumbri... earthworm
lumen... the tube down a hollow organ lymph... "clear fresh water" lysis... breaking down
malar... cheek (outside) mal(i)... abnormal, bad malacia... soft
malako... soft medi... middle portion medulla... soft inner part
meli... sweet malleo... hammer mere... part
manu... hand mara... wither mast(i)... whip, flog, beat
mast(o)... breast mea... passage meatus... external opening
meios... lessening melano... black melia... limb
mening... meninges men(i)s... moon, month ment... mind, chin
meter... measure metro... uterus mito... thread
mnem... memory mnes... memory mob... move
morb... sick morph... shapes, dreams mot... move
mur(al)... wall musc... mouse, muscle myc(o)... fungus
myelo... soft, pith myi... fly (insect) myo... muscle
myxo/muco... slime narco... sleep naso... nose
necro... dead nephelo... cloud nephr... kidney
nerv... nerve neuro... nerve nos,...nox nasty, sickening
nous... mind, spirit nyct... night occiput... back of the head
ocul... eye (h)odo... way, path, road odon... tooth
odyn... pain olfact... smell oma... tumor/lump
omen(t)... omentum omphalo... belly button on(e/t)... to be
onco... tumor, mass onycho... nail (finger/toe) oo... egg (umlaut over second "o" is optional)
oophor... ovary (umlaut over second "o" is optional) op... eye, see, etc. ophth... eye
opio... poppy juice opsi... late opson... relish, meat seasoning
orbi... wheel orch... testis org... work
oro... mouth ortho... straight os... bone, mouth
osm... smell ost(eo)... bone ot(o)... ear
ovin... sheep oxy... oxygen, acid p(a)ed... child
palpebr... eyelid pap... nipple par(i)t... have a baby
parietal... wall partheno... virgin partum... birth
patho... disease, misery pect... chest pelvis... basin
pes/ped... foot phage... eat phakos... lentil, lens of the eye
pharmako... sorcery, poison, drug phase... phase pheo... ugly, dusky
phero... carry, bear philo... like, love phlebo... vein
phleg... flame phoco... seal (the animal) phoro... carry, bear
phos/phot... light phragm... divide into two, wall off phren... mind, breath
phth... waste away, wither phyllo... leaf-like physio... nature
phyte... a plant pineo... pine cone pinna... feather
pino... drink pisi... pea pituit... snot
placent... cake, placenta plak... cake plantar... sole of the foot
plasm... molded plast... molded platy... flat
plegia... stroke, paralysis pleur... pleura ("side of ribs") plex... braid, wind together
plexy... stroke plic... braid, wind together pn(e)... breath
pod(o)... foot poie(sis)... making polio... gray; gray matter of the nervous system
pollic... thumb pomp... precede, parade porph... purple
porta... door posthe... foreskin prac... done
prag... done prax... done pre/pro... before
procto... rectum pron(o)... prone, face down proto... first
pseud... false psyche... spirit, mind psychr... cold, frigid
pter... wing pto... droop pty(alo)... spit
pulmo... lung punct... prick, little spot pupa... doll, miniature figure
purp... purple pyelo... vat, basin, pelvis pykno... shrivelled
pyo... pus p(u/y)ri... pear pyr(o)... fever (cognate to "fire")
radi... rod r(h)ach... backbone re(i)n... kidney
ret(ic)... net rhabdo... striated muscle rhaph... sew together
rheo... flow rheum... runny stuff rhino... nose
riso... smile rrha(g)... discharge from a burst vessel rub(r)... red
sacc... sack sacch(ar)... sugar salpinx... trumpet, oviduct
sang(ui)... blood sapro... dead sarc(o)... flesh
sarcoma... cancer from connective tissue or muscle scato... feces, filth scapho... boat
schi(s/z)... split sclero... hard scope... examine carefully
sebo... hard fat, skin grease, suet sec/seg... cut sella... saddle
seps/sept... make rotten septo... fence, partition sero... whey, wet protein
sial... saliva sinus... hollow or pocket skel... dried up, skeleton
soma/somy... body spasmo... a drawing tight spondylo... spine
sphinct... bind tight, squeeze shut sphygno... heartbeat spir... breathing
splanchn... innards staphyl... bunch of grapes stasis... standing up, being stable
stat... stop statio... standing up, being stable staxis... drip, drop
stem... standing up, being stable steato... fat sterco... feces
sthen... strength stigm... spot stole... to pull, to draw
stom(a)... mouth stomy... mouth strepto... wavy
stylo... stylus sudo... sweat sulco... plowed furrow
syring... pipe, tube, reed tachy... fast, swift tact... touch
tainia... band, tapeworm talo... ankle tasis... stretch
tarso... flat plate taxo... arrangement, put in order telo... the tip, the end
temporal... temple ten(d)o... stretch, tendon terato... monster
theca... box (sheath, covering) thel... breast, covering layer thenar... palm, sole
thym... mind, spirit, mood thym... warty mass, thymus gland thyro... oblong shield
toco... have a baby tom(e)... cut tono... stretch
topo... place tort... twist tox(o)... bow, arrow, poisoned arrow
trema... hole tricho... hair trophy... grow/food
tryps... break into many pieces, crush tuber... bump, potato(e) typho... smoky, delirious fever
typhl... cecum unguis... nail (finger, toe) uro... urine
uvo... grape vacc... cow vago... wanderer
valgus... turned outward varus... turned inward vaso... blood vessel
velo... veil, curtain, cover vener... sexual acts, lusty veno... vein (as opposed to artery)
vert... turn vesico... bladder viscero... innards
volv... turn around, twist around xantho... yellow xeno... stranger
xero... dry z(a)o... to live zoo;... animals (umlaut over second "o" is optional)
zema... boiled zygo... yoke zyme... ferment

PREFIXES

a(d)-... towards a(n)-... without ab-... from
ab(s)-... away from ad-... towards allo-... other, another
ambi-... both amphi-... on both sides, around ana-... up to, back, again, movement from
aniso-... different, unequal ante-... before, forwards anti-... against, opposite
ap-, apo-... from, back, again bi(s)-... twice, double bio-... life
brachy-... short cata-... down circum-... around
con-... together contra-... against cyte-... cell
de-... from, away from, down from deca-... ten di(s)-... two
dia-... through, complete di(a)s... separation diplo-... double
dolicho-... long dur-... hard, firm dys-... bad, abnormal
e-, ec-... out, from out of ecto-... outside, external ek-... out
em-... in en-... into endo-... into
ent-... within epi-... on, up, against, high eso-... I will carry
eu-... well, abundant, prosperous eury-... broad, wide ex-, exo-... out, from out of
extra-... outside, beyond, in addition haplo-... single hapto-... bind to
hemi-... half hept-... seven hetero-... different
hex-... six homo-... same hyper-... above, excessive
hypo-... below, deficient im-, in-... not in-... into, to
infra-... below, underneath inter-... among, between intra-... within, inside, during
intro-... inward, during iso-... equal,same juxta-... adjacent to
kata-... down, down from macro-... large magno-... large
8b>medi-... middle mega-... large megalo-... very large
meso-... middle meta-... beyond, between micro-... small
neo-... new non-... not ob-... before, against
octa-... eight octo-... eight oligo-... few
pachy-... thick pan-... all para-... beside, to the side of, wrong
pent-... five per-... by, through, throughout peri-... around, round-about
pleo-... more than usual poly... many post-... behind, after
pre-... before, in front, very pros-... besides prox-... besides
pseudo-... false, fake quar(t)-... four re, red-... back, again
retro-... backwards, behind semi-... half sex-... six
sept-... seven sub-... under, beneath super-... above, in addition, over
supra-... above, on the upper side syn-... together, with sys-... together, with
tetra-... four thio-... sulfur trans-... across, beyond
tri-... three uni-... one ultra-... beyond, besides, over

SUFFIXES

-ase... fermenter -ate... do -cide... killer
-c(o)ele... cavity, hollow -ectomy... removal of, cut out -form... shaped like
-ia... got -iasis... full of -ile... little version
-illa... little version -illus... little version -in... stuff
-ism... theory, characteristic of -itis... inflammation -ity... makes a noun of quality
-ium... thing -ize... do -logy... study of, reasoning about
-megaly... large -noid... mind, spirit -oid... resembling, image of
-ogen... precursor -ol(e)... alcohol -ole... little version
-oma... tumor (usually) -osis... full of -ostomy... "mouth-cut"
-pathy... disease of, suffering -penia... lack -pexy... fix in place
-plasty... re-shaping -philia... affection for -rhage... burst out
-rhea... discharge, flowing out -rhexis... shredding -pagus... Siamese twins
-sis... idea (makes a noun, typically abstract) -thrix... hair -tomy... cut
-ule... little version -um... thing (makes a noun, typically concrete).....

Appendix VIII

Curriculum Position Paper -- Pathology


    Among all the subjects that young doctors need,
    It takes a strong Path course to get them to speed.

    When science and medicine come to conjunction,
    The pathologist's task matches structure and function.

    And all in the spirit of good Doctor Still,
    Path isn't just facts, it's a cognitive skill.

    Though there's things to remember, I always must try
    To help student doctors to ask and tell "Why?"

    Our Path course is brief, packed in limited time,
    So I work them intensely -- that's surely no crime.

    A patient care-giver needs both knowledge and reason,
    Must think clearly and well -- not to do so is treason.

    The patients today are quite rightly demanding,
    They want help and answers, all with clear understanding.

    And with managed care, a modern physician
    Must be teacher and advocate, not just technician.

    They'll forget their Path trivia -- Pathology's task
    Is to understand sickness -- that's all that I ask.

    And so I talk less, make them think and do more,
    And they say, "Hey! We're learning! That's what we're here for!"

    So that's all I have -- a bit of bad verse on
    Pathology learning geared for the whole person.


          -- Ed Friedlander, 1997

Visitors to www.pathguy.com
reset Jan. 30, 2005:

Ed at homeDrop by and meet Ed

Ed says, "This world would be a sorry place if people like me who call ourselves Christians didn't try to act as good as other good people ." Prayer Request

Teaching Pathology

Pathological Chess


Taser Video
83.4 MB
7:26 min