Cyberfriends: The help you're looking for is probably here.
Welcome to Ed's Pathology Notes, placed here originally for the convenience of medical students at my school. You need to check the accuracy of any information, from any source, against other credible sources. I cannot diagnose or treat over the web, I cannot comment on the health care you have already received, and these notes cannot substitute for your own doctor's care. I am good at helping people find resources and answers. If you need me, send me an E-mail at scalpel_blade@yahoo.com Your confidentiality is completely respected.
DoctorGeorge.com is a larger, full-time service. There is also a fee site at myphysicians.com, and another at www.afraidtoask.com.
Translate this page automatically
With one of four large boxes of "Pathguy" replies. |
I'm still doing my best to answer everybody. Sometimes I get backlogged, sometimes my E-mail crashes, and sometimes my literature search software crashes. If you've not heard from me in a week, post me again. I send my most challenging questions to the medical student pathology interest group, minus the name, but with your E-mail where you can receive a reply.
Numbers in {curly braces} are from the magnificent Slice of Life videodisk. No medical student should be without access to this wonderful resource. Someday you may be able to access these pictures directly from this page.
I am presently adding clickable links to
images in these notes. Let me know about good online
sources in addition to these:
Also:
Medmark Pathology -- massive listing of pathology sites
Freely have you received, freely give. -- Matthew 10:8. My
site receives an enormous amount of traffic, and I'm
handling about 200 requests for information weekly, all
as a public service.
Pathology's modern founder,
Rudolf
Virchow M.D., left a legacy
of realism and social conscience for the discipline. I am
a mainstream Christian, a man of science, and a proponent of
common sense and common kindness. I am an outspoken enemy
of all the make-believe and bunk that interfere with
peoples' health, reasonable freedom, and happiness. I
talk and write straight, and without apology.
Throughout these notes, I am speaking only
for myself, and not for any employer, organization,
or associate.
Special thanks to my friend and colleague,
Charles Wheeler M.D.,
pathologist and former Kansas City mayor. Thanks also
to the real Patch
Adams M.D., who wrote me encouragement when we were both
beginning our unusual medical careers.
If you're a private individual who's
enjoyed this site, and want to say, "Thank you, Ed!", then
what I'd like best is a contribution to the Episcopalian home for
abandoned, neglected, and abused kids in Nevada:
My home page
Especially if you're looking for
information on a disease with a name
that you know, here are a couple of
great places for you to go right now
and use Medline, which will
allow you to find every relevant
current scientific publication.
You owe it to yourself to learn to
use this invaluable internet resource.
Not only will you find some information
immediately, but you'll have references
to journal articles that you can obtain
by interlibrary loan, plus the names of
the world's foremost experts and their
institutions.
Alternative (complementary) medicine has made real progress since my
generally-unfavorable 1983 review linked below. If you are
interested in complementary medicine, then I would urge you
to visit my new
Alternative Medicine page.
If you are looking for something on complementary
medicine, please go first to
the American
Association of Naturopathic Physicians.
And for your enjoyment... here are some of my old pathology
exams
for medical school undergraduates.
I cannot examine every claim that my correspondents
share with me. Sometimes the independent thinkers
prove to be correct, and paradigms shift as a result.
You also know that extraordinary claims require
extraordinary evidence. When a discovery proves to
square with the observable world, scientists make
reputations by confirming it, and corporations
are soon making profits from it. When a
decades-old claim by a "persecuted genius"
finds no acceptance from mainstream science,
it probably failed some basic experimental tests designed
to eliminate self-deception. If you ask me about
something like this, I will simply invite you to
do some tests yourself, perhaps as a high-school
science project. Who knows? Perhaps
it'll be you who makes the next great discovery!
Our world is full of people who have found peace, fulfillment, and friendship
by suspending their own reasoning and
simply accepting a single authority that seems wise and good.
I've learned that they leave the movements when, and only when, they
discover they have been maliciously deceived.
In the meantime, nothing that I can say or do will
convince such people that I am a decent human being. I no longer
answer my crank mail.
This site is my hobby, and I presently have no sponsor.
This page was last updated February 6, 2006.
During the ten years my site has been online, it's proved to be
one of the most popular of all internet sites for undergraduate
physician and allied-health education. It is so well-known
that I'm not worried about borrowers.
I never refuse requests from colleagues for permission to
adapt or duplicate it for their own courses... and many do.
So, fellow-teachers,
help yourselves. Don't sell it for a profit, don't use it for a bad purpose,
and at some time in your course, mention me as author and KCUMB as my institution. Drop me a note about
your successes. And special
thanks to everyone who's helped and encouraged me, and especially the
people at KCUMB
for making it possible, and my teaching assistants over the years.
Whatever you're looking for on the web, I hope you find it,
here or elsewhere. Health and friendship!
Pathology Education Instructional Resource -- U. of Alabama; includes a digital library
Houston Pathology -- loads of great pictures for student doctors
Pathopic -- Swiss site; great resource for the truly hard-core
Syracuse -- pathology cases
Walter Reed -- surgical cases
Alabama's Interactive Pathology Lab
"Companion to Big Robbins" -- very little here yet
Alberta
Pathology Images --hard-core!
Cornell
Image Collection -- great site
Bristol Biomedical
Image Archive
EMBBS Clinical
Photo Library
Chilean Image Bank -- General Pathology -- en Español
Chilean Image Bank -- Systemic Pathology -- en Español
Connecticut
Virtual Pathology Museum
Australian
Interactive Pathology Museum
Semmelweis U.,
Budapest -- enormous pathology photo collection
Iowa Skin
Pathology
Loyola
Dermatology
History of Medicine -- National Library of Medicine
KU
Pathology Home
Page -- friends of mine
The Medical Algorithms Project -- not so much pathology, but worth a visit
National Museum of Health & Medicine -- Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Telmeds -- brilliant site by the medical students of Panama (Spanish language)
U of
Iowa Dermatology Images
U Wash
Cytogenetics Image Gallery
Urbana
Atlas of Pathology -- great site
Visible
Human Project at NLM
WebPath:
Internet Pathology
Laboratory -- great siteEd Lulo's Pathology Gallery
Bryan Lee's Pathology Museum
Dino Laporte: Pathology Museum
Tom Demark: Pathology Museum
Dan Hammoudi's Site
Claude Roofian's Site
Pathology Handout -- Korean student-generated site; I am pleased to permit their use of my cartoons
Estimating the Time of Death -- computer program right on a webpage
Pathology Field Guide -- recognizing anatomic lesions, no pictures
St.
Jude's Ranch for Children
I've spent time there and they are good. Write "Thanks
Ed" on your check.
PO Box 60100
Boulder City, NV 89006--0100
More of my notes
My medical students
Clinical
Queries -- PubMed from the National Institutes of Health.
Take your questions here first.
HealthWorld
Yahoo! Medline lists other sites that may work well for you
We comply with the
HONcode standard for health trust worthy
information:
verify
here.
Outline the scope of the introductory course in pathology and clinical pathology. Describe the announced criteria for passing, and the factors that will be considered in any narrative performance summary. Give the title or nickname of the course text or the last name of its first author.
Describe the scope of pathology as a discipline. Distinguish general, systemic, anatomic, and clinical pathology. Mention at least three things a pathologist does when he or she is not teaching medical students! Tell how to contact your pathology instructors.
Identify Rudolf Virchow as the founder of modern pathology. Explain briefly the idea that pathology deals with human beings from the molecular to the social levels, and mention at least one health problem "caused by politicians".
Explain why we call our approach to pathology "scientific", and why we believe that we are telling you the truth. Distinguish various levels of scientific statements ("theory", "hypothesis", etc.) Answer common criticisms of pathology education made by non-physicians. Mention and justify at least one criterion for evaluating a media health claim.
Define iatrogenic disease, mention the extent of the problem, give at least two examples, and explain why some iatrogenic disease is acceptable. Comment on the application of Hippocrates' dictum, "First Do No Harm" to today's medical practice.
Mention how we screen for color-blindness, and tell what a color-blind student should do in lab.
INTRODUCTION
Where there is love of medicine, there is love of humankind.
Test all things; hold fast to what is good.
Pathology is the scientific study of disease. Disease could
reasonably be defined as internal problems that cause
pain and/or interfere with a person's ability to work, play, and/or love others.
Injuries (mechanical, chemical, electrical, or thermal), poisonings, and bad habits may or may not be
included in someone's definition of disease.
The social pathology that leads to disease is often listed among a patient's problems. Dr. Virchow,
the founder of modern pathology, considered it a principal mechanism of disease, though it falls
outside the domains of anatomic and clinical pathology.
There are several thousand distinguishable diseases. Generally, we will not tell you in this course
about diseases that affect fewer than 1 in 20,000 people during their lifetimes.
Doctors talk about disease and other human tragedy without showing obvious emotion. We are
sometimes asked how we can do this. Knowing the truth about our problems is essential before we
can do much about them.
INEVITABLE, SERIOUS DISEASES: Everyone who lives long enough will probably get:
Atherosclerosis: an accumulation of cholesterol and debris in cells of the intimal layer of the large
arteries, eventually ruining the artery. Some atherosclerosis is inevitable.
Alzheimer's changes: the anatomic lesions of Alzheimer's appear
in the brains of most, probably all, elderly people. Symptomatic Alzheimer's
may or may not be inevitable.
Osteoarthritis: irreversible wear-and-tear and age-related changes in joints.
Osteoporosis: irreversible loss of the substance of bones
Senile macular degeneration: Central blindness due to old age
Senile cataract: Opacification of the lens due to old age
OUR VERY COMMON, SERIOUS DISEASES
Atherosclerosis remains our most ubiquitous health problem. It kills a majority of US citizens. The
epidemic peaked in 1968, and atherosclerosis will soon be second to cancer as a killer of Americans.
Atherosclerosis begins during the first year of life.
Severe atherosclerosis causes transient ischemic attacks, strokes, angina pectoris, heart attacks,
ruptured aortic aneurysms, leg claudication, bowel ischemia, kidney destruction (by
"atheroembolization") and gangrene of the legs.
Whether atherosclerotic plaques in humans can be made to go away is a subject of debate today. In
the animal models, it is largely reversible. I predict that
during the next few years, cardiologists will focus on "vulnerable plaque"
(i.e., the lipid-rich areas that actually cause most of the trouble)
and discover that it often shrivels to nothing when coronary risk factors
are eliminated.
Cancers ("malignant neoplasms") are groups of cells that grow as if they were a new organ, invade
and destroy normal tissue, and spread to remote sites by the bloodstream or lymph vessels.
These develop in approximately 35% of US citizens (1,334,100 new cases this year, 556,500
deaths).
The higher incidence in men is mostly explained by more incidental prostate cancers. The higher
mortality in men is mostly explained by men having been smoking longer.
The commonest cancers in male humans (#'s: 2003)
(1) Prostate cancers (220,900 new cases this year;
28,900 deaths; lung cancer used to be more common,and plus prostate cancer
is being diagnosed much sooner)
(2) Lung cancers (91,800 new cases this year;
total rate is declining!; 88,400 deaths, obviously as lethal as ever)
(3) Colon-rectum cancers (72,800 new cases this year, 28,500 deaths)
(4) Bladder cancers (42,200 new cases this year; 8600 deaths)
(5) Lymphomas and myeloma (40,100 new cases this year; 17,500 deaths)
(6) Melanomas (29,900 new cases this year; 4700 deaths)
(7) # Kidney cancers (19,500 new cases this year; 7400 deaths)
(8) Oropharynx cancers (18,200 new cases this year, 4800 deaths, going down)
(9) # Leukemias (17,900 new cases this year; 12,100 deaths)
(10) Pancreas cancers (14,900 new cases this year; 14,700 deaths; very lethal cancer);
(11) Stomach cancers (13,400 new cases this year; 7000 deaths)
(12) Liver and biliary cancers (14,800 new cases this year; 10,500 deaths)
(13) Esophagus cancers (10,600 new cases this year; 9900 deaths; very lethal cancer)
(14) # CNS cancers (10,200 new cases this year; 7300 deaths)
(15) Larynx cancers (7100 new cases this year,
thankfully declining; 3000 deaths)
The commonest cancers in female humans:
(1) Breast cancers (211,300 new cases this year; 39,800 deaths; the rate probably is stable, while the
death rate is declining significantly)
(2) Lung cancers (80,100 new cases this year,
will soon catch up with the men; 68,800 deaths, making it the
#1 cancer killer of women by a solid margin)
(3) Colon-rectum cancers (74,700 new cases this year; 28,800 deaths)
(4) Endometrium cancers (40,100 new cases this year; 6800 deaths)
(5) Lymphomas and myelomas (35,500 new cases this year; 17,360 deaths)
(6) Ovary cancers (25,400 new cases this year; 14,300 deaths)
(7) Melanomas (24,300 new cases this year; 2900 deaths)
(8) Bladder cancers (15,200 new cases this year; 3900 deaths)
(9) Pancreas cancers (15,800 new cases this year; 15,300 deaths;
very lethal cancer)
(10) Thyroid cancers (16,300 new cases this year; 800 deaths)
(11) # Leukemias (12,700 new cases this year; 9800 deaths)
(12) Uterine cervix cancers (12,200 new cases this year, 4100 deaths; despite low U.S. rates, this is
the great cancer killer of young women worldwide)
(13) # Kidney cancers (12,400 new cases this year; 4500 deaths)
(14) Oropharynx cancers (9500 new cases this year; 2400 deaths)
(15) Stomach cancers (9000 new cases this year; 5100 deaths)
(16) # CNS cancers (8100 new cases this year; 5800 deaths)
"#" designates categories that contain a large number of pediatric patients.
NOTE: Small skin cancers that are easily cured are not included. These categories include cancers
of all degrees of aggressiveness that arise in a particular organ. For example, the common lung
cancers are still nearly 100% fatal, but some cancers that arise in the lungs are slow-growing, and
intercurrent disease can kill these patients.
High blood pressure ("hypertension") means increased systemic systolic and/or diastolic pressure.
High blood pressure eventually affects 15% of US citizens. The causes may be apparent but are
usually mysterious.
Complications of most forms of high blood pressure include accelerated atherosclerosis, strokes,
heart pump failure, brain malfunction, and kidney damage.
Not everyone with occasional elevated blood pressure readings is sick. The significance of such
"labile hypertension" remains unclear.
Emphysema (loss of the elasticity in the lung air spaces) and chronic bronchitis (longstanding
inflammation of the larger airways) are very troublesome.
These are very common, and are to be expected in cigaret smokers and those who must breathe
polluted air.
Diabetes mellitus means lack of insulin or resistance to its actions.
Maybe 5% of US citizens eventually get some form of diabetes. Today, its most serious
consequences are damage to the arteries, arterioles, eyes, kidneys, and nerves.
Bacterial pneumonias are infections within the alveoli of the lungs.
These often affect people with underlying physical problems. Bacterial pneumonia is a common
mechanism of death in these people.
Aspiration pneumonias result from getting something bad (especially stomach contents) into the
airways.
This is a very common mechanism of death in people with underlying physical or substance-abuse
problems.
Actually most bacterial pneumonias are the results of aspiration of micro-organisms from the mouth.
Tuberculosis: a special bacterial pneumonia that was once a major killer of healthy young people.
TB infection is still common, but serious disease is controllable.
Deep vein thrombosis: a blood clot in the deep veins, usually of a leg.
This is a minor problem by itself, but if the clot breaks off, it can cause sudden death by
traveling to
the pulmonary arterial tree. When this happens, it is called a pulmonary thromboembolus ("blood
clot in the lung").
Child abuse and neglect
This has always been widespread, but it has only recently been recognized as important. Although it
is reported much more often today, I know of no reason to believe that its prevalence in the US is
increasing.
Psychoneuroses
Anxiety, depression, agoraphobia, panic attacks,
and related phenomena that appear to result (at least in part) from
one's experiences rather than from well-defined organic changes. The basic ability to test reality is
preserved.
Somewhere between 10% and 70% of US citizens are impaired by psychoneuroses on any given
day.
Emotional overlay ("the supratentorial component") is important in most serious illness.
Alcoholism: loss of self-control in drinking ethyl alcohol.
Around 10% of US citizens ultimately become alcoholics. This is harmful to them and to their
families, employers, and other associates.
If you feel a compulsion to drink, or cannot stop after one drink,
then you must stop for the rest of your life. If you don't care about
yourself, then at least do this for the sake of those around you.
Around one US citizen in three presently has a serious personal problem because of an alcoholic.
Nicotine addiction
This is the principal risk factor for:
lung cancer
Combined with alcoholism, it is the principal risk factor for:
mouth and throat cancer
It is an important risk factor for:
atherosclerosis/sudden cardiac death
Today, most new nicotine addicts are adolescents. Cigaret smoking, once macho, is now a teenaged
girl's vice.
NOTE: Human beings are selectively fearful. Consider smokers
who won't try a single parachute jump "because you can get killed"....
Osteoporosis
This disables many older people, especially older women. It can produce chronic pain, collapsed
vertebral bodies, fractured hips, etc., etc.
Osteoarthritis
This causes pain and interferes with movement.
Alzheimer's disease
This eventually results in profound loss of mental function.
Alzheimer's disease includes "senility". Around 15% of US citizens have it when they die.
HIV virus infection (AIDS virus infection)
Iatrogenic disease
OUR VERY COMMON, USUALLY LESS SERIOUS DISEASES (NON-DISEASES, ETC.):
Each of these affects 5% or more of US citizens at risk sometime during their lives. Some can be
fatal, others are only trivial.
Bacterial diseases
boils
Viral, chlamydial, and mycoplasmal diseases
viral upper respiratory infections
Fungal, protozoal, and parasitic diseases
tinea ("athlete's foot", "crotch rot", "ringworm", etc.)
Men's stuff
adolescent gynecomastia
Women's stuff
fibrocystic diseases of the breast
Skin diseases
Circulatory system
floppy mitral valve ("Barlow's syndrome")
Digestive diseases dental caries ("cavities")
Allergic diseases
food allergies (milk, eggs, peanuts, sesame, wheat, fish, shellfish, etc.)
Above the neck
functional headaches (muscle spasm, migraine, cluster)
Musculoskeletal problems
low back pain
Nutritional problems
obesity
Burns
Despite all this, today's North Americans and Northern Europeans (no, not the Himalayan Hunza
people; that's a cynical lie) are the healthiest people ever.
WORLD HEALTH
All the diseases listed so far are common all over the world.
Other diseases are very prevalent in some or all of the developing nations.
These are primarily political and economic problems rather than scientific mysteries.
Very common, could be controlled
Very common, less controllable:
Very common, less morbidity:
The governments of certain "developing" nations actively oppose efforts to control infectious
diseases among their poor. They know that these diseases are important in limiting population
growth.
During the last few years, the standing of the World Health Organization, a major branch of the
United Nations, has deteriorated greatly in the eyes of the medical world.
I think a lot of this criticism is misdirected, but the
facts are still discouraging. Despite some success
against particular infectious diseases, the World Health Organization is helpless to deal with the
kleptocratic politics of the poor nations, where governments want their people sick. Instead of
focusing on what it does best, it has taken refuge behind a facade of rhetoric ("Health is...." "Health
for all by the year 2000", etc.) and grandiose, useless programs. For the sickening facts, see Br.
Med. J. 309: 1425, 1491, 1566 & 1636, 1994 and 310: 110 & 178, 1995; Lancet 345: 203, 1995;
Lancet 351: 351, 743, 1998.
At least the money doesn't seem to be going into the kleptocrats' Swiss bank accounts, which is itself
quite an accomplishment.
Today, most health-sector activities in the poor nations are funded by
the World Bank, which has taken a hard-nosed attitude in the 1990's and
required reform (i.e., the government must adopt policies that encourage
free enterprise and a strong economy) and cooperation. See Lancet 351: 665, 1998.
WORDS FOR COMMON AND/OR TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASES: You need to know these
terms.
Epidemic: a disease that is widespread in a community of people. (It is often, but need not be, a
contagious disease).
Epizootic: an epidemic in a community of animals. (Pronounce it "EPP-ee-zoe-WOTT-ick".)
Pandemic: a worldwide epidemic.
Endemic: a never-ending epidemic.
Infectious disease: one caused (or assumed to be caused) by micro-organisms (the infectious agents)
that can be transmitted from creature to creature.
Zoonosis: an infectious disease that people usually acquire from sick animals rather than from other
people.
Vector: an organism, usually an insect, that carries an infectious disease from person to person, etc.
Carrier: a person who harbors the infectious agents but has no symptoms.
Reservoir: the place (usually animals or carriers) where an infectious agent lives between epidemics.
HOW COMMON IS A DISEASE?
First, you must define the disease and the population.
Criteria for making the diagnosis of a disease are generally established by pathologists. The autopsy
is still ultimate proof of the presence or absence of most diseases.
The population may be all the people in Kansas City, all the pregnant women in Missouri, all the US
citizens currently living in Tokyo, all the scleroderma patients attending a certain clinic, etc.
Incidence: the number of new cases during a period of time (generally new cases per
100,000 population per year)
Prevalence: the total number of cases during a period of time (generally cases per
100,000 population)
Obviously, incidence equals prevalence divided by average duration.
OUR FATAL DISEASES YESTERDAY
Our ancestors died of bacterial diseases, smallpox, famine, trauma, and obstetrical
catastrophes.
Cancer and gout probably followed. Mosquito-borne diseases have also been very important in
warmer regions.
The common bacterial infections caused the majority of deaths, young and old people.
Pneumococcal pneumonia was such a common killer of the elderly that it was called "the old man's
friend". It did not spare the young, either. Dr. William Osler called the pneumococcus "captain of
the men of death". Today penicillin ("the old man's enemy") cures all but neglected cases.
Other gram-positive cocci (staphylococcus, streptococcus) were major killers. They produce a
variety of illnesses.
Tuberculosis ("the white plague") killed 1 person in 5. Today almost all cases are curable using
drugs.
Syphilis killed 1 person in 5 or even more in the centuries after its introduction, and caused chronic
severe pain and/or insanity in many more. Today it is easily cured using antibiotics.
Bubonic plague ("black death") killed half the people in Europe and Asia every few centuries. Now
it is easy to cure.
Typhus, a rickettsial disease transmitted by lice, was another highly fatal epidemic disease,
especially during wartime. Cholera was yet another major epidemic killer, especially during the
1800's.
Infantile diarrhea is usually a bacterial disease. It is still a major world-wide killer. All these babies
could be saved were it not for political, social, and economic problems.
Influenza, caused by a virus, was another dread epidemic disease. Death is usually due to bacterial
superinfection of the damaged lungs.
Yellow fever (caused by a virus) and malaria (caused by a protozoan) were two very important,
mosquito-borne killers.
Smallpox, caused by a virus, was the leading cause of death in many countries until vaccination
made it preventable.
Most people in the US are immunized: against these diseases, which would otherwise be common:
Diphtheria
Several relatively common, noninfectious, non-cancerous diseases that were once often fatal but are
now usually cured by surgery.
Abdominal aortic aneurysms
Without high technology, these would all be important killers once again. (The only exception is
smallpox, which seems to be extinct, but could well reappear as a biological
weapon.)
OUR FATAL DISEASES TODAY
What kills the two million people who die yearly in the US?
Atherosclerosis
Myocardial infarction ("heart attack") and sudden cardiac death
(These together cause 600,000 deaths per year.)
Stroke (200,000 deaths per year)
Ruptured aortic aneurysm (less common)
(These figures include diabetics, because most diabetics die of atherosclerosis.)
Risk factors for atherosclerosis are:
(1) Elevated serum cholesterol (by far the most important)
Cancer (over half a million deaths in the US each year)
Any cancer, untreated, will eventually kill the patient.
Approximately 25% of US citizens die of cancer
Slightly more men than women die, since breast cancers are often cured.
See the earlier section on common serious diseases for information about various cancers.
Remember lung cancer is now the commonest cancer killer of both men and women. ("You've come
a long way, Baby.")
Emphysema and chronic bronchitis (150,000 deaths per year)
Cigaret smoking causes the overwhelming majority of fatal cases.
High blood pressure and heart pump failure (100,000 deaths per year)
High blood pressure promotes atherosclerosis and kidney disease, but it can also kill by causing
heart pump failure.
Heart pump failure ("congestive heart failure") may also be due to disease of the valves, anatomical
defects, amyloidosis, drugs, virus infections, and so forth.
Alcoholism is the other leading cause of "natural" (?!) death:
Cirrhosis of the liver (70,000 deaths per year from this alone; in the US, alcohol is the usual cause.)
Alcohol is also involved in a majority of homicides, suicides, and accidents.
Pulmonary thromboembolus is primary cause of 50,000 deaths a year. (The source is usually a leg
vein, sometimes a pelvic vein.)
Many more patients with serious underlying diseases die with these travelling thrombi as the final
mechanism.
Kidney disease (35,000 deaths a year)
Common fatal kidney diseases include chronic glomerulonephritis, chronic interstitial nephritis
("pyelonephritis"), and adult polycystic kidney disease.
Diabetes mellitus, amyloidosis, systemic lupus, and bad high blood pressure are other common
causes of end-stage kidney disease.
Alzheimer's disease (including "senility") causes many deaths, usually through bacterial-aspiration
pneumonia.
Bacterial and aspiration pneumonias are common final mechanisms of death in many debilitating
diseases.
Today, the pneumonias seldom kill a previously-healthy young person.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
In some communities, AIDS remains a leading cause of death.
Unnatural deaths:
Homicides (around 30,000 per year)
Suicides (true number unknown, estimates give it around 50,000 per year)
"Accidents" (around 100,000 per year)
When pathologists speak of the manner of death, we mean "natural",
"homicide", "suicide", or
"accidental". We may also conclude, after autopsy, that the manner of death is "undetermined".
Iatrogenic disease is disease caused by medical diagnosis and/or treatment. It is epidemic, though
deaths are usually listed under the patient's disease and often would have occurred anyway. (Classical
scholars call it "iatrogenous disease"....) For the disturbing Harvard study, see NEJM 324: 307 &
377, 1991.
What kills young people in the US?
"Before birth":
An unknown percentage (at least 31%, maybe more -- NEJM 319: 189, 1988) of fertilized eggs fail
to implant or are lost before pregnancy is recognized.
Around 1 out of every 6 known implantations is followed by spontaneous miscarriage.
There are around 1.5 million legal abortions performed in the US yearly. (Contrast this to large
areas where both contraception and abortion are illegal, and where illegal abortion is the leading
cause of death in women aged 15-39: Br. Med. J. 300: 1705, 1990.)
You will have to decide for yourself what all this means.
Under one year: Prematurity and birth defects
Around 1.3% of US newborns die from these causes. This is pretty good; only a few nations with
fewer % poor do better.
Mysterious "sudden infant death syndrome" kills around 0.5% of infants during the first year of life.
See below. Ages 1-19:
Males:
(1) "Accidents" (around 8000 / year)
(2) Homicide (around 2500 / year)
(Homicide is extremely common in the age 10-20 range in certain U.S. communities; JAMA
267: 2905, 1992)
(3) Suicide (around 1700/year)
(4) Cancer (around 1200/year)
Females:
(1) "Accidents" (around 4000 / year)
(2) Cancer (around 1000 / year)
(3) Homicide (around 700 / year, double the suicide rate)
Child abuse and neglect causes some deaths among children. The true prevalence is unknown and is
controversial -- at least some are overlooked ("accidents" or "sudden infant death syndrome").
Likewise, the incidence of infanticide in the developing nations is unknown, but is probably high.
(1) Accidents (around 20,000 / year)
(2) Suicide (around 9000 / year)
(3) Homicide (around 8000 / year)
(4) Heart disease, followed closely by cancer and then HIV infection
(2) Cancer (Around 6000 / year)
(3) Heart disease (around 2800 / year)
(4) Suicide, followed closely by homicide and HIV infection
Natural death in young athletes:
The average American's chances of being killed by (Nature 367: 39, 1994):
motor vehicle accident...
1 in 100
LIFESTYLE-RELATED DISEASES:
Today's deadly diseases in the US are largely lifestyle-related. (This is one factor that contributes to
physicians' dissatisfaction with their work!)
Alcohol abuse and nicotine addiction are grave public health problems. Use of certain of the illegal
drugs (amphetamine, cocaine, heroin, phencyclidine, others) is clearly harmful.
Contrary to what you have been told by doctor-bashers, the prevalence of alcoholism and drug
addiction among physicians is substantially lower than among their non-physician peers. However,
doctors do have an unfortunate tendency to prescribe mind-altering substances for themselves. Don't
do this. See JAMA 267: 2333, 1992.
Sexual promiscuity (homosexual, heterosexual) causes many health problems.
Obesity and lack of exercise probably contribute to ill-health.
Americans tend to eat too much salt, saturated fat and cholesterol, too many calories, and
too
little
fiber. Sucrose (cane sugar) is bad for the teeth.
Sunlight is the principal cause of all three common skin cancers, as well as the cancer that arises
within the adult eye. (Sunlight also helps activate vitamin D, but vitamin D supplementation of
food has apparently eliminated our need for sunlight.)
Some food additives that make some people sick are tartrazine yellow (dye), monosodium glutamate
("Chinese restaurant syndrome"), wasabi (horseradish served with sushi, the "Japanese restaurant
syndrome"), and sulfites ("salad-bar asthma").
Despite the claims of "alternative medicine", the following are probably not significant health
problems. (Let us know if you have additional facts about these.)
INHERITED DISEASE AND BIRTH DEFECTS
Commonest serious Mendelian genetic diseases:
Many genetic syndromes are much more prevalent within particular ethnic groups. No race is
"superior". Here are a few to remember:
While we're here... I have often questioned the value of
declaring the person's race at the beginning of the
case presentation. I give my "race" as "human", and believe that everybody
else should, too. Compared with Euro-Americans,
Afro-Americans have substantially more
deaths due to high blood pressure, plasma cell myeloma, and
prostate cancer, and substantially fewer
deaths due to malignant melanoma; they also
have far less osteoporosis and testicular cancer.
The commonest chromosomal syndromes are Klinefelter's (XXY; 1/850) and Down's syndromes
(trisomy 21; maybe 1/1000). Turner's (XO) and "supermale" (
XYY,
a curious subject) are slightly less common.
The commonest catastrophic birth defects are neural tube defects (bad "spina bifida", etc.;
1/500 births) and cerebral palsy (maybe 1/400).
DREAD DISEASES OF YOUNG ADULTS:
Several common, chronic diseases that can be really bad and that begin during young adult life are
listed here, with their approximate prevalence among young adults.
"NEW DISEASES" (unknown, rare, or seldom recognized a few years ago):
"NON-DISEASES" (i.e., named entities that produce no morbidity or are beneficial)
Some of these might be considered minor cosmetic problems, or patients may actually like them.
EASY-TO-MISS DISEASES
Here's my list of easy-to-miss, easy-to-treat, deadly-if-untreated diseases.
DISEASES WE SKIP
In this course, we do not discuss certain functional medical problems (i.e., those that lack any
known anatomic correlate). However, it is obvious that physiologic defects are essential to
these processes.
Other important medical problems are largely mechanical and you will learn about these on your
rotations.
A few other important entities usually fall outside the domain of anatomic pathology:
Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, blocks (bundle branch, Winckebach's, Mobitz II, Stokes-Adams
attacks, etc.), channelopathies like Brugada's and long QT,
and a host of other cardiac conduction-rhythm problems are diseases for
electrocardiographers, not pathologists.
Transient ischemic attacks of the brain ("little strokes"), amaurosis fugax, and related phenomena
leave no anatomic traces.
The anaphylactic, vasovagal, and vagovagal varieties of shock can cause death with little or no
anatomic change. So can postural asphyxias ("swallowing the tongue", etc.)
The anatomic pathology of cerebral concussion is unknown.
RIGHT TREATMENT, WRONG REASON
"Science is self-correcting". In medical school, I was taught silly mechanisms ("nitrates dilate your
calcified coronary arteries!") for the following treatments, which actually work well but by a
different mechanism:
MORE WORDS ABOUT DISEASES
Symptoms: what the patient tells you, the physician.
Signs: what you, the physician, discover on physical exam and special studies, by yourself or with
help. Means the same as findings.
Lesion: any unit of abnormal anatomy (less often, abnormal chemistry or an abnormal molecule)
Morphology: the anatomic lesion(s)
Etiology: what causes the disease. A noun or nouns. If it's external, it's called the etiologic agent.
The etiology of many diseases is unknown.
Pathogenesis: how the etiologic agent causes the disease. A short story that usually includes
"many of the steps are presently unknown".
Pathognomonic: a sign or group of signs that occur in only one disease. Same as diagnostic (of).
Prognosis: how the patient can realistically expect to do.
Syndrome: A group of symptoms and/or signs that tend to run
together but may be caused by any of several diseases
THE GREATEST MISERY
Which diseases cause the most overall suffering and time lost from work prior to old age? It is
probably a near-tie:
MALE:FEMALE RATIOS
Many diseases clearly occur more often in one sex or the other.
The reasons for this are seldom known, but will probably be discovered. (For example,
pre-menopausal women are immune to South American blastomycosis because estrogens cause the
fungus to revert to hyphal form, which is easily killed by the body.)
These rules of thumb work most of the time:
Women are more likely to get any disease in which autoimmunity is believed to be an important
mechanism (except diseases linked to a particular class I HLA molecule, i.e., ankylosing spondylitis
and its family).
Women also are more prone to develop significant osteoporosis.
Men are more likely to get all the other diseases.
THE MOST INTERESTING DISEASES
This is a matter of opinion. You may decide the psychiatric disorders are the most interesting.
Especially intriguing are treatable organic diseases that affect the mind. Remember these before you
commit your patient to psychotherapy or a life in custodial care!
CULT DIAGNOSES ("imaginary diseases")
Multiple chemical sensitivities is seen almost exclusively in survivors
of real child abuse.
Strangely, most or all synthetic chemicals cause symptoms (but no objective
signs), exactly at the threshold at which the chemical can be smelled.
Natural chemicals do not have this effect.
The obvious conclusion is the correct one.
Tell such a person that an odor is synthetic (even carbon dioxide), and it will
produce symptoms. Victims typically try to force everyone around them not to
use cologne or deodorant, etc., etc. If a schoolchild is designated as "victim",
all the teachers and other kids are affected. And so forth.
The false memories syndrome ruined thousands of lives for the falsely-accused
before society finally wised up. Rather than learn new methods of coping
with adult life, emotionally-disturbed people were told instead that they
were horribly scarred by (probably-imaginary) forgotten sexual abuse and/or satanic
cult exposure and/or alien abduction. Again, the cult keeps people sick.
There are certain to be more cults like this in the future.
As physicians, you will discover that if you suggest to someone that
a particular symptom will develop, it will. This makes these
iatrogenic diseases.
TREATING DISEASE
We are healthy because of good food, good sanitation, adequate living space, public health
programs, and a good medical system for treating diseases and injuries. (It is hard to say which of
these is most important.)
Some diseases can be cured.
Examples include surgical diseases (localized cancers, appendicitis, hernias, gallstones, etc.), and
bacterial and parasitic diseases.
Surgery became practical with antisepsis in the later 1800's, while the antibiotics came into use in
the 1940's. Before this, the history of therapeutics was essentially the history of quackery and
iatrogenic disease.
Most other diseases are not curable, but can be treated.
Treatments that work well are generally simple once you understand the pathology. Treatments that
don't work well are generally quite elaborate. (One notable exception is chemotherapy for a few
cancers, principally those that occur in young people.)
Again, most effective treatments are of relatively recent origin.
Your patients may be self-conscious about disease that cannot be treated, and cannot be hidden.
Other people tend to shy away from the person who's visibly different.
Not for sissies, but the best, and easiest, ice-breaker when the problem cannot be hidden is for the
patient to draw attention to the problem. Decorate your wheelchair (movie, "Silver Bullet"). Put
plastic flowers on your crutches. "Do you like my birthmark [grin]? Feel how rough it is!" "Every
hair fell out of my body when I was only six!" "A bear did that to me [chuckle]." "I'm a hobbit."
Choose a nickname ("Folks call me 'Patch' / 'Spot' / 'Eraser Man'!")
The practice of medicine in the U.S. has become so corrupted by big-money and big-egos (plus an
occasional bit of sheer stupidity) that Americans now trust their lawyers more than their physicians,
particularly to explain all the options truthfully and to act according to their wishes (NEJM 330:
223, 1994).
I would like you to help change this back. I will give you the knowledge and the power to reason;
you need to find the integrity within yourselves.
The medical care that people receive in the US is high-quality but very expensive. Often the benefits
of treatment are obvious, often they are not. Our society has decided to make
it hardest for the working poor to obtain basic care, and rations
the care for those with access by "managed care". Expect this to change.
Health care costs total around 12% of our gross national product. Remember these equal health
care incomes. Physician's bills make up around 30% of this. In 1992, we spent $800,000,000,000
on health care.
The British health care system generates only half the costs (and half the incomes) of our health care
system. The British seem to be just as healthy as we are.
It is commonplace for the hospital bill for a profoundly brain-damaged premature baby to total
$100,000 or more. (By comparison, the amount spent to save each otter after the Exxon Valdez oil
spill was a mere $80,000: Science 254: 1596, 1991.)
The average cost to the family of a child who has died of leukemia (not counting the portion that
their insurance pays) is $38,000. (There are around 12,000 new cases of childhood leukemia per
year; around half of them get cured, the other half die.)
In mid-1986, the average AIDS victim lived 160 days with the disease, and died with medical bills
totalling $140,000. A lot has changed
since then,
but the cost of treating ten
American AIDS victims exceeds the total health care expenditures of several developing nations
with millions of sick people.
There are now 10,000 people in the United States in irreversible comas. There are many thousands
more with profound mental impairments or "locked in". (All these are unkindly called "vegetables";
"apallic" means no working cortex.) All would die quickly without continuous medical care, and
someone pays $130,000 per patient per year (Br. Med. J. 301: 1094, 1990).
Today, the usual cause of a well-to-do US family's being reduced to poverty is medical bills for the
care of one member.
Around 28 million US citizens have little access to primary health care because they have neither
insurance nor welfare.
One factor that makes health care more expensive in the US is large awards in medical malpractice
cases. The average award today is over one million dollars.
It is probably inevitable that any system of health care distribution will contain perverse incentives
(Sci. Am. 269(1): 24, July 1993) either to overtreat-overcharge (fee-for-service, defensive medicine)
or to undertreat (HMO's/managed care, British socialized medicine).
Disease can ruin the quality of life for a person. Most of us physicians find it hard not to treat
disease under any circumstances.
Managed care saved the health care system in the mid-1990's.
Managed death is next.
Most states now have a Natural Death Act, reflecting a world-wide movement. (Of course, you
don't stop treating all patients who say they want to die.) Right or wrong, by the time you are in
practice, active euthanasia, under some circumstances, will almost certainly be legal throughout
most, if not all, of the U.S.
Active euthanasia is already a fact of life in most countries (for example, Hastings Center Reports
22(6): 3, Nov.-Dec. 1992), though it remains illegal. French physicians
talk freely about euthanizing babies when there is profound neurological
damage (Lancet 355: 2112, 2000). The Dutch legalized active euthanasia
experience: Lancet 338: 669, 1991. Euthanasia was lately (1997) legal, with some controls, in
parts of
Australia (NEJM 334: 326, 1996). However, this was reversed on political pressure.
Oregon's
"Ballot Issue 16" succeeded in 1994 and was strongly supported by the Federal appeals court (i.e.,
the government has no reason to interfere with a terminally-sick person's desire to die comfortably;
this thinking would put active euthanasia on a par with legal abortion).
Colombia legalized it in 1997 (Br. Med. J. 3134: 1852, 1997),
the same month that the Supreme Court decided that physician-assisted suicide was not a
constitutional right, but that the states could
decide (Washington vs. Glicksberg,
Vacco vs. Quill). Oregon made it legal in 1997 (NEJM 340:
577, 1999), and it has had a major impact on terminal care, not so much
that assisted suicide is being carried out but that physicians
have educated themselves about things they can do instead (JAMA 285: 2363, 2001;
JAMA 288: 91, 2002 is a good "what to do when..." article).
The reason people choose it is mostly out of fear
of losing autonomy and/or bowel/bladder control (NEJM 342: 598, 2000).
Suicide and assisting suicide for an altruistic motive have always
been legal in modern Switzerland, and the Swiss will probably soon
legalize active euthanasia (Br. Med. J. 321: 271, 2003).
Active euthanasia used to bother me some. However, it is now pretty clear that
a solid majority of the American public wants to allow active euthanasia in certain incurable-disease
situations: (NEJM 326: 197, 1992; JAMA 267: 2658, 1992; according to the JAMA, several
mostly-pro-life demographic segments that one would expect to oppose the idea actually support it
strongly). In 1992, a state referendum (Washington Initiative 119) failed; exit polls showed it failed
only because voters thought the particular ballot proposal lacked sufficient controls.
Both the physicians and the
public in Jack Kevorkian's Michigan seem to strongly prefer legalization over an explicit ban
(NEJM 304: 303, 1996). The British overwhelmingly
favor active euthanasia in cases of intractable suffering and useless life: Br. Med. J. 305: 728, 1992.
Even the British Medical Journal, not noted for its radical editorials, called Jack Kevorkian a
"hero": Br. Med. J. 312: 1431, 1996.
The Netherlands experience, and a little number juggling for the US,
indicates that physician-assisted suicide won't be a huge money-saver
for the public (NEJM 339: 167, 1998) -- implicit is the
reassurance that it won't do major harm to health care incomes.
More from the Netherlands: NEJM 342: 551, 2000.
Mount Sinai euthanasia survey: NEJM 338:1193, 1998.
According to this anonymous poll, it's not as widespread
in the US as you might think. Only about 10% of oncologists say
they have performed physician-assisted suicide (Ann. Int. Med. 133: 527, 2000)
New definitions of death will focus on permanent loss of higher cortical functions and allow a
physician to pronounce a patient dead while the heart is beating (Hast. Cent. Rep. 23(4): 18, 1993; I
said years ago this would happen as the need for health care rationing became obvious). For some
reason (not physicians' incomes, surely), the AMA still goes gah-gah over both active euthanasia and
physician participation in capital punishment (JAMA 270: 365, 1993, though abortion
for convenience isn't a
problem), but the AMA is now willing to publish neutral articles on what a physician should do if
asked for active euthanasia (accompanied, of course, by reaffirmations of its opposition to active
euthanasia; JAMA 270: 870, 874 & 875, 1993). The New England Journal no longer subscribes to
the anti-euthanasia taboo: NEJM 334: 1374, 1996.
Were I to request active or passive euthanasia, or end my life to escape the ravages of disease or
injury (any of which I might at some time do), I would want at least some of the money that would
have been spent on my care to go to help poor children who would otherwise not have a chance in
life. I suspect that most decent people think similarly, and a few physicians are finally finding the
courage to say as much in public (South Afr Med. J. (!): 82: 35, 1992).
Today's medicine causes health problems. Much of this is unavoidable, and is even expected.
Iatrogenic ("doctor-caused") problems include:
In considering today's epidemic of iatrogenic disease, we must remember that all the writings of
Hippocrates ("First Do No Harm") do not contain a single remedy specific for a particular disease.
It is a fact that patients almost always misrepresent what has happened between them and any
physician. (For example, I have never heard a physician tell a patient how long he or she would
live.) Remember this when you take patient histories, and when you hear "testimonials" (good or
bad).
UNCONVENTIONAL TREATMENTS
Many sick people seek treatment from outside the hated "medical establishment". They may choose
from a wide range of unconventional healers.
Many people claim that they have been healed by unconventional means. You will have to form
your own opinion about each case.
Rheumatoid arthritis, regional enteritis, multiple sclerosis, and warts often seem to respond
remarkably well to spiritual healing. I know no naturalistic explanation for these cases, though
there might be one, and there are no "placebo-controlled studies".
If you investigate other cases thoroughly, you will most often discover that the patient never had the
disease, or was cured by conventional means, or had a self-limited disease, or still has the disease.
Denial of illness is characteristic of many sick people. Remember also that some people are under
great pressure to say they have been healed "spiritually". Many people still believe that serious
disease is a punishment for extraordinary sinfulness (their own, their parents').
As a lawyer, Ms. Rodham-Clinton wrote a brief arguing that the state could force parents who
believed their child's cleft palate was "God's punishment" to have it fixed anyway. The Republicans
(convention, 1992) cited this as proof she was "anti-family".
When you read articles pointing out that sick people who attend church
seem to do better than those who don't, bear in mind that those attending
church are perhaps not so sick and/or have a better support system.
Most clergy are happy to work with physicians, and a spirit of mutual respect usually prevails.
Two references on "commercial" (?) faith-healing:
Dr. William Nolen's Healing: A Doctor in Search of a Miracle, 1974. Dr. Nolen, a Christian,
personally investigated Katheryn Kuhlmann, occultist Norbu Chen, and the Filipino psychic
surgeons. Dr. Nolen saw no evidence of any miracles. All but Kuhlmann were blatant and
shameless frauds.
Professional stage magician James Randi's personal investigation of TV faith-healers appears in The
Faith Healers, Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1987. Mr. Randi describes many fraudulent practices.
(For me, the most damning of all the observations is that the "televangelists" never approach or
televise the members of the audience that are truly and visibly sick -- multiple sclerosis, cerebral
palsy, visible tumors, obvious deformities, etc.)
People in the US spend over ten billion dollars per year on the unproven remedies of alternative
medicine. This is several times greater than the total spent on medical research.
Almost without exception, health-care providers who say they use alternative techniques have never
tested their methods by honest, controlled experiments. Instead, they have six standard excuses.
(1) "Our methods are harmless and pleasant."
(2) "Our methods are less expensive than the AMA's."
(3) "Our methods are spiritual and/or cannot be explained."
(4) "We will never treat individual 'whole persons' as statistics."
(5) "The methods of science are invalid (Einstein's relativity, Heisenberg's uncertainty,
'Postmodernism', etc.)"
(6) "We don't have any money for research." (!?!)
Alternative practitioners make a great show of loving their patients. They are also much more likely
than faith-healers to attack the characters, motives, and skill of honest physicians.
NOTE: In 1986, the average yearly income for a chiropractor, after taxes and expenses, was
$116,000.
Attacks on genuine science come from both the screwball right and the screwball left, and are
hallmarks of both. Now that the left-wing social agenda (i.e., massive government redistribution of
wealth and opportunity) is overwhelmingly unpopular around the world, left-wing nuts in
"academia" have little to do except bad-mouth science, which nobody understands anyway. For
example, in 1995, the $5.3 million dollar Smithsonian "Science in American Life" exhibit omitted
all reference to the space program and the transistor in favor of an emphasis on underrepresentation
of women and minorities in science, and how research is often driven by the
corporate profit motive instead of pure altruism
(Nature 374: 207, 1995; and you thought Marxist ideology was dead?) A real scientist on
the project complains about domination of the whole project by left-wing "social scientists and
pseudoscientists who had no idea how science really works."
Evidence that spiritual healing or alternative remedies are ever effective remains anecdotal.
But right or wrong, spiritual healers and alternative medical practitioners have a tremendous impact
on your patients' perceptions of disease and medical doctors.
In particular, be aware that some of your most helpless patients will have their therapeutic and pain
medications withheld by families who have bought into "spiritual" ("Christian" or "New Age") or
"alternative healing".
As of this writing, the Office of Alternative Medicine (now the National
Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine),
established at the NIH for political reasons,
isn't inspiring much confidence (Sci. Am. 269(3): 39, Sept. 1993; JAMA 280: 1553, 1998)
HOLISTIC MEDICINE
Classical pathology describes discrete diseases and this enables us to treat patients effectively. There
actually are different diseases that are best treated by different methods.
Offering a simple-minded explanation and a "safe natural treatment" for the "whole" of disease (or
to strengthen the "whole" patient) are standard ploys of the medical quack.
So is the meaningless charge that "AMA doctors don't understand health".
Do not confuse the slogans of quackery with the methods all physicians use to understand and help
their patients as people.
The relationship between "stress" and disease remains poorly understood. (All about stress: JAMA
267: 1244, 1992, for physiologists).
In many animal models, stress seems to help cause specific diseases, but in many others, it seems to
help prevent specific diseases.
All the serious recent work I could find has utterly failed to confirm the once-fashionable claims that
certain "stressful life-events"
tend to precede the appearance or recurrence of clinical diseases
apart from the psychiatric syndromes.
For
example, see
J. Inf. Dis. 178S1:S67, 1998 (zoster),
Arch. Int. Med. 159: 2430, 1999 (genital herpes),
Cancer 77: 1089, 1996 and
Cancer 79: 105, 1996 and Br. Med. J. 304: 1078, 1992 and
Br. Med. J. 319: 1027,1999
(breast cancer);
Arch. Gen. Psych. 49: 396, 1992 and Am.
J. Psych. 148: 733, 1991 (AIDS);
Am. J. Card. 68: 1171, 1991 (coronary disease); Ann. Int. Med.
114: 381, 1991 and Gut 31: 179, 1990
inflammatory bowel disease).
The one exception is multiple sclerosis, where a relationship
has long been clear (Br. Med. J. 327: 646, 2003).
Also discredited
is the old "holistic" claim that serious disease and
death are more likely after bereavement and so forth (J. Behav. Med. 13: 263, 1990).
By the mid-1990's serious researched had stopped even looking at this stuff.
You may hear that people unconsciously choose particular diseases to "symbolize their emotional
conflicts". Patients are blamed for being sick because they have unhealthy attitudes. In some circles
(both "liberal-holistic" and "conservative-spiritual"), people scapegoat the sick. This is cruel, and it
is also groundless (NEJM 312: 1570, 1985).
Be aware of the ways in which lifestyle affects disease, and the effect of the disease and its treatment
on the "whole patient" and his or her associates. But be realistic.
Your patient has other problems besides the disease. It may help if you know what these are, but
there is seldom much you can do about them.
You may run into "religious conservatives" who contend that unusual sickness means unusual
wickedness, and "if you were really sorry for your sin, you would walk out healed", etc. It's hard to
argue with these folks, but I'm not aware of any reason to think this is true. And following Job, I
prefer incomplete answers to the obviously-wrong answers of uncharitable ignorance. See also
Luke, "If a tower falls on you and kills you, does that mean you were more wicked than the next
person?" "No."
A school of pop psychology (popular with both left-wingers and
right-wingers, it seems to have peaked
in the late 1980's, but is still with us) emphasizes "everyone is an addict of some kind and is either in
recovery or in denial", "you cannot begin to solve the problems of others until you have solved your
own", and "the process of recovery is never finished". Only an ideologue would consider these to be
better than half-truths.
No reasonable person would deny the importance of lifestyle in several common diseases, and the
importance of attitude and participation in some situations faced by sick people. But be aware that
many of your patients who have non-lifestyle-related diseases are being told they are "responsible",
"have bad attitudes", etc., etc.
I note with some satisfaction an increasing use of the compound word "self-empowerment" by
today's trendoids. As far as I can tell, it means, "Quit sobbing, shut up, wise up, act smart, and make
a life for yourself." Watch for even more of this, especially in view of diminishing public's
indulgence for (and tolerance of) do-nothings and crybabies.
Patients like to have the physician explain their diseases and procedures to them. They also like
being given something to do to help in their treatment. They like to be treated courteously, and most
of them like to be touched. If a physician does these things, patients will usually be satisfied with
the overall care they have received.
Catch-phrases of the "political correctness" movement (which peaked in the early 1990's) include
"different abilities / differently-abled" for handicaps, and "challenged" instead of "sick".
This led to some Alice-in-Wonderland litigation; for example, in some jurisdictions you cannot
consider that being in a wheelchair is a worse outcome than being able to walk, because being in a
wheelchair is "differently abled". I'd like to meet the left-wing nut, confined to a wheelchair because
of a physician's error, who forgoes suing for damages, since he or she is now "differently abled".
Likewise, "challenges" are issued to winners, not to losers. (Even immunologic "challenges" are
administered to creatures known to have fought off infection before.) I cannot regard simply getting
sick, especially from some unhealthy and unwholesome practice, as making somebody a winner.
A word-search in 1993 showed these terms to be common in the allied-health literature, but non-existent in writings intended
for physicians.
The Americans with Disabilities Act has made a level playing-field
for companies wishing to hire the handicapped. It has also led to
some bizarre law. There
are some the-sky's-the-limit entitlements.
And it only applies to disabled people.
For example, if you have cystic fibrosis (a real disability) but
can do a particular job, they cannot fire you for it,
and have to make reasonable accommodations if you want to apply
for the job. However, if you
are fired by some moron
for carrying the gene (this has happened), you have
no legal recourse, and your rights have not been violated,
because you are not disabled.
Today, "medical ethics" is a growth industry that pays extremely well (i.e., protection from
lawsuits; Pediatrics 93: 310, 1994).
It was also obvious to this writer, when he was in training, that opposition by other physicians to
discontinuing heroic therapy was motivated, at least in part, by economic incentives. (Yeah, there
will never be a health-care reimbursement system without perverse incentives.) Remember this the
next time somebody's "awful ethical dilemma" seems incredibly silly.
Today's ethicists talk about "futility"
(JAMA 281: 937, 1999)
as if it were a new scientific discovery, instead of just the plain
truth that there are problems you can't solve despite massive effort and money. (Cynics: The
"futility movement" coincided with changes in reimbursement plans for physicians and hospitals
which meant that they would lose, rather than make, money when families insisted on "doing
everything" for their dying loved one....) We even hear about something "beyond futility", i.e.,
disability and death with dignity (JAMA 287: 2253, 2002) and comfort.
FINAL NOTE
Pathology is the scientific knowledge that will enable you to find and treat disease effectively. Don't
be discouraged! There's plenty you can do!-- ERF
-- Hippocrates
-- Paul (I Th 5:12)
emphysema/chronic bronchitis
Buerger's thromboangiitis obliterans (only rare one on the list)
esophageal cancer
larynx cancer
bladder cancer
gum disease
kidney cancer
pancreas cancer
upset stomach and peptic ulcer
household fires
cellulitis
strep throats
bacterial conjunctivitis
bacterial ear infections
impetigo
food poisoning (especially staphylococcal)
bacterial diarrheas ("Montezuma's revenge", etc.)
gonorrhea (one million cases yearly; 300,000 hospitalizations)
viral and mycoplasmal chest colds
viral and chlamydial conjunctivitis
viral and mycoplasmal ear infections
viral gastroenteritis
infectious mononucleosis
herpes zoster infections (chickenpox, shingles)
herpes simplex I (lip) and II (genitals)
cytomegalic inclusion disease (cytomegalovirus infection)
chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis
fungal infections of the nails
"subclinical" histoplasmosis
"subclinical" toxoplasmosis
lice ("pediculosis")
knee injuries
varicoceles
sports injuries
inguinal hernias
impotence
premature ejaculation
male pattern baldness (bothers some men, doesn't bother others, some men like it)
homosexuality As always, this is
extremely politicized; right or wrong,
"ego-dystonic" gay men are not the only people nowadays
who seek to become more comfortable with a range of sexual
expressions
transvestism ("cross-dressing")
Again, hard to justify as a "disease" though some men may wish to be
rid of the compulsion
benign prostatic enlargement
microscopic cancers of the prostate
menstrual iron deficiency anemia
frigidity
menstrual cramps
vaginal infections (candida, trichomonas, gardnerella)
bacterial urinary bladder and kidney infections
atypias of the cervical epithelium
leiomyomas ("fibroids") of the uterus
endometriosis
vomiting of pregnancy
pre-eclampsia
miscarriages
cystoceles
menopausal hot flashes
kraurosis of the vulva
idiopathic hirsutism
acne
atopic dermatitis ("eczema")
seborrheic dermatitis (dandruff, "oily skin", etc.)
contact dermatitis
drug rashes
miliaria ("prickly heat", "jungle rot", etc.)
warts
seborrheic keratoses
tinea versicolor and ringworm
capillary hemangiomas
dermatofibromas
pigmented nevi ("moles")
lentigos ("moles", "liver spots", etc.)
epidermoid inclusion cysts ("sebaceous cysts")
sun-damaged skin
actinic keratoses
patent foramen ovale (usually a trivial autopsy finding)
varicose veins
gum disease
aphthous stomatitis ("canker sores")
reflux peptic esophagitis
hiatus hernias
peptic ulcers of stomach and duodenum
diverticular disease of the colon
functional bowel disease ("spastic colon")
hemorrhoid problems
Gilbert's "disease" (problems conjugating bilirubin)
gallstones
respiratory allergies ("hay fever", asthma)
poison ivy
refractive errors, astigmatism
presbyopia
cataracts
conjunctivitis
impacted earwax
otitis externa
presbycusis
serous otitis
otosclerosis
mild perceptual and learning problems
bursitis
tendinitis
sprains
fractures
ingrown toenails
bunions
"subclinical" folic acid deficiency (major problem, long-neglected)
iron deficiency
"subclinical" iron overload
(??) "functional hypoglycemia" ("idiopathic post-prandial syndrome")
(??) "subclinical" zinc deficiency
Tetanus killed more victims of war wounds than the wounds themselves did. Today almost
everybody in the US is effectively immunized against to tetanus toxin.
Russell Crowe's character in "Gladiator" reflected after
the battle
about how many of his men would go on to die of wound infections.
Measles
Mumps
Pertussis ("whooping cough")
Rubella ("German measles")
Poliomyelitis
Smallpox (thought to be extinct today)
Tetanus
Appendicitis
Berry aneurysms
Benign ovarian tumors
Bleeding peptic ulcers
Cardiac valvular problems
Congenital heart diseases
Dissecting aneurysm
Diverticulitis
Ectopic pregnancies
Gallstones
GI malformations
Intussusception of the bowel
Kidney stones
Obstetrical problems
Strangulated hernias
Volvulus
(2) Cigaret smoking
(3) High blood pressure
(4) Diabetes mellitus (less important than any of the first three factors)
(5) Lack of exercise (less important than any of the first four factors)
(6) Hereditary differences in the lipoprotein molecules and their receptors,
homocysteine metabolism, and the coagulation
proteins. Some of these are very important, and are being sorted out.
(7) Obesity? stress? (Whether these are independent risk factors is unclear. You will have to decide
for yourself!)
Ages 20-39:
Males:
Females:
(1) Accidents (around 6000 / year)
murder...
1 in 300
house fire...
1 in 800
firearm accident...
1 in 2500
electrocution...
1 in 5000
passenger plane crash...
1 in 20,000
flood...
1 in 30,000
tornado...
1 in 60,000
fireworks...
1 in 1 million
botulism...
1 in 3 million
asteroid or comet impact with earth...
1 in 3000 to
1 in 250,000
The suicide rate among black men in the US is also far lower
than among white men. For a review, see Lancet 351: 934, 1998.
Primary care is the pinnacle of medical practice because
the physician must constantly be asking, "What is the WORST TREATABLE
thing this COULD POSSIBLY be?" Then the physician must rule this out (or in).
Porphyrias and other inborn errors of metabolism have few or no anatomic changes, and we will
discuss these only briefly.
"A court of law is not a good place to try to get at the truth."
Certain "cult" diagnoses have had a devastating impact
on both their "victims" and those around them.
People with emotional problems typically feel chronically unwell.
(The mainstay of therapy is to learn new living skills to replace those
that were once required to survive in an abusive home.)
However, once such a person self-diagnoses or is diagnosed as having
a "cult" diagnosis, he/she gains "victim" status, will make absurd
demands on others, and will get
sicker and sicker.
Welcome to the introductory Pathology course. Most of you are undergraduate medical students. In this course you will learn the essential facts about human disease, so that you will be able to practice honest medicine.
Ideas about disease have changed during human history. People have thought about sickness as magical and mysterious, as abnormalities of whole persons, as abnormalities of individual organs, as abnormalities of cells, and as abnormalities of molecules.
Primitive people believe diseases are caused by gods and spirits. Diseases occur because people sin beyond the community standards, break taboos, or are bewitched. Primitive people treat diseases by praying, confessing their sins, and acting out magical ceremonies. In many cultures, the patient must show unquestioning faith, or the gods will be displeased and the patient will suffer. Most cultures also have some naturalistic ideas about disease. So primitive people also treat sick people by putting things into any and all body orifices, or even by creating new body orifices.
The ancient Egyptians made around 700,000,000 mummies. They took the organs out of the dead people and preserved them. Oddly, we have no record that Egyptian doctors ever examined their former patients' insides. They made some notes on practical therapeutics, but most of the surviving Egyptian medical literature is occult nonsense. One evil spirit is called "Mr. Pus-Friend, Cancer-Brother", etc.
The ancient Greek medical texts never mention supernatural causes of disease. The ancient Greeks had no concept of the real mechanics of disease, beyond observations of wounds, tumors, "swellings", etc. The best-known physician of ancient Greece was Dr. Hippocrates (460-377 BC). He and his students believed all diseases were processes that involved entire persons. Dr. Hippocrates sometimes tried to explain disease in terms of the traditional doctrine of four humors (blood, phlegm, yellow bile, black bile.) Disease is caused by imbalances of the four humors ("bad blendings," "dyscrasias") within the whole person. Disease was never localized to one part of the body. All this was wrong, but Dr. Hippocrates was no dogmatizer and the "four humors" myth probably did his patients no harm.
Hippocrates
Dr. Hippocrates was really an empiricist. He taught his students to carefully observe patients and
watch what happened to them as they were treated. Dr. Hippocrates proved that sick people can be
examined, their diseases classified, a diagnosis made for each, a prognosis established, and the
patient treated intelligently. Although the Greeks understood almost nothing about real disease
processes, they did discover what treatments helped for different patients. But except for minor
surgery, they had no specific remedies for specific diseases. The Greeks cured almost nobody.
Dr. Hippocrates is most famous for institutionalizing the high ideals of medical ethics. The
Hippocratic oath made medicine a sacred calling rather than just a way of making a living.
Hippocrates emphasized that some diseases are not treatable and that it is a credit to the physician to
be candid about this. Two Alexandrian physicians did autopsies.
Dr. Herophilus (335-280 BC) to do the first descriptions
of cadaver dissection, and Dr. Eristratos (310-250) to correlate organ changes with diseases
(ascites with cirrhosis, etc.)
Their work had no real impact on the
understanding of disease.
They tried to correlate their findings with the clinical pictures with some
success, but they had no influence on prevailing dogmas.
Dr. Cornelius Celsus (first century AD) described medical practice in his time in De Medicina. This
book includes descriptions of heart disease and mental illness, and the four classic signs of
inflammation. Dr. Claudius Galen (130-200 AD), another Roman, began his career as the
government physician to the gladiators. A careful observer, Dr. Galen soon became a famous
physician, writer and lecturer. He discovered and explained several anatomic structures, including
the recurrent laryngeal nerve, which he named "Galen's nerve." He wrote up some amazing
experiments he did on living animals, and he published long lists of the rich and famous people who
attended his lectures.
Galen Dr. Galen dissected Barbary monkeys instead of humans. His mistakes included the five-lobed
human liver, the two common bile ducts, and the holes where the blood goes through the septum of
the heart. Dr. Galen's work remained the absolute authority until time of Dr. Vesalius. At anatomy
demonstrations in the middle ages, the learned anatomy professor read out loud from Galen while
the lowly morgue attendant cut on the body. If the morgue attendant found something that was not
in "Galen", the professor ignored it. So there was exactly no progress in anatomy or anatomic
pathology.
Dr. Celsus and Dr. Galen knew how inflammation and cancer looked and acted, and they
emphasized patterns of symptoms and signs. For lack of any better theory of pathology, both these
Roman doctors subscribed to the "four humors" idea of Dr. Hippocrates. Dr. Galen was also an
amateur pagan philosopher and some of these writings survive too. He respected his Jewish and
Christian neighbors, and was opposed to the persecutions. Like Dr. Hippocrates, Dr. Celsus and
Dr. Galen had no concept of organ pathology, and they probably cured nobody.
Neither Dr. Hippocrates nor Dr. Galen ever did an autopsy (at least lawfully).
Ancient and medieval superstition
prohibited opening a dead body. Pathologic anatomy was limited to observing war wounds, bone
injuries, skin diseases and a few clinical signs.
In the middle ages, the Moslem world
produced the best physicians. They were excellent observers of the living, but did not do autopsies.
It took special permission from the pope to allow Dr. Mondino de Luzzi to perform an autopsy in front of an
audience; this took place in Bologna in 1316.
The autopsy (necropsy, post-mortem exam, "post") became popular only after Dr. Vesalius's
anatomic work (1543). People realized that they could learn about the world by observing it,
instead of reading old books.
When autopsies became legal, early investigators made many discoveries
that offered new
understandings of old diseases, but nobody understood essential diseases processes. As Dr. Galen
and humoralism lost popularity, new fad theories emerged to explain all disease. In countries where
it was legal to teach the existence of atoms, methodist physicians attributed all disease to changes in
distances between atoms. In countries where atomic theory was still banned for ideological
reasons (too unspiritual), pneumatist (vitalist)
physicians blamed disease on the spiritual forces that controlled physiologic processes.
All previous anatomic pathology was superseded in 1761 by Dr. John Morgagni, an Italian. He
called his charming series of 700 autopsies The Seats and Causes of Disease, Investigated by Anatomy. Written at age 78,
it summed up a lifetime's experience and is still a great read.
On the evidence, Dr. Morgagni was a genuinely good human being and was among
the most beloved people of his era.
Thanks to his work, all disease was now recognized as
disease of organs, and disease "sat" in different organs in different patients.
Dr. Morgagni
meticulously related his patients' symptoms to their diseased organs, making the first
clinico-pathologic correlations. This was real progress, but
Dr. Morgagni had no real idea of how disease in one organ caused malfunction in another organ, or
even what disease is.
Since every major organ has one vein, Dr. Morgagni's students developed the
next fad theory. All disease was due to phlebitis, inflammation of the vein draining the organ.
Morgagni Dr. Karl Rokitansky of Vienna was the next great autopsy pathologist. He wrote the Handbook of
General Pathologic Anatomy (1846), and in his day was the world's most famous pathologist.
Vienna law decreed that everybody who died got autopsied by him. He did over 30,000 autopsies
personally. Dr. Rokitansky was a colleague of Dr. Joseph Skoda, the world's most famous clinical
diagnostician. In the morning, Dr. Skoda taught all the Viennese medical students on the wards and
tried to make diagnoses on the patients who were still alive. In the afternoon, everybody went
downstairs to see Dr. Rokitansky's autopsies on the dead patients and find out whether Dr. Skoda
had been right. Thus, Dr. Rokitansky performed the most important function of the medical
pathologist, relating clinical signs and symptoms to pathologic anatomy, and correlating function
and structure. The medical students handled all the fresh organs without gloves and then go deliver
babies without washing their hands. This was unhealthy, but it continued until a young instructor
named Dr. Ignatius Semmelweiss introduced mandatory hand-washing. But that's another story.
Semmelweiss Dr. Rokitansky and Dr. Skoda agreed that the medical therapeutics of their era had little to offer.
(They were right.) Dr. Skoda's motto was "Forget treatment, the diagnosis is everything". They
called this approach therapeutic nihilism. Dr. Skoda the clinician and Dr. Rokitansky the
pathologist were brilliant, but nobody really had any idea what caused most disease. They didn't
even know about germs. Dr. Rokitansky came up with a theory to explain all disease as crasias and
dyscrasias. These caused the non-cellular ground substance to produce new defective cells.
Skoda
Dr. Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902) is the greatest pathologist of all time. Dr. Virchow was a
German, a tiny man, almost a dwarf. Dr. Virchow started as a junior autopsy pathologist working
for the German government at the University of Berlin. He liked to cut thin sections of diseased
tissues with a razor, and look at them using the latest technology, the microscope. Dr. Virchow first
achieved renown by discovering leukemia and myelin.
During the German revolution of 1848, there was a bad typhus epidemic. The government sent
Dr. Virchow to find out what caused typhus. After investigating, he announced that typhus was
caused by the conservative politicians, who had done nothing about poverty and overcrowding. The
government fired him for saying this, and he continued his work elsewhere. Since Dr. Virchow's
time, pathologists have remained interested in the social pathology that produces disease.
Dr. Virchow's book Cell Pathology (1858) is the basis for all modern pathology. Dr. Virchow
worked out hypertrophy, hyperplasia, metaplasia, basic acute and chronic inflammation,
granulomas, thrombosis, infarction, the nature of tumor growth and routes of tumor spread,
and
much more. If nobody tells you who discovered something, there is a good chance it was
Dr. Virchow. Dr. Virchow established the principle that all cells come from pre-existing cells and he
emphasized that all disease is disease of cells. Dr. Virchow's ideas were introduced within months of
the two other great unifying principles of today's science, the periodic table of the elements and the
common origin of living things. Although he described much of the anatomy of illness, and was not
himself an experimentalist, Dr. Virchow realized the overriding importance of the new science of
experimental physiology. He emphasized that morbid anatomy always reflects disordered
pathophysiology.
Dr. Virchow became a member of the German senate, for his time an extreme liberal, even a pinko.
Dr. Virchow liked to describe the body as a republic with every cell equal.
Especially, Virchow despised notions of "race" as unscientific (Nature 427: 487, 2004).
Chancellor Otto von
Bismark hated Dr. Virchow so much that in 1865 he challenged him to a duel. Dr. Virchow
accepted, and chose as the weapons two sausages. He stipulated that his sausage was to be a clean
cooked sausage, and Bismark's sausage was to be loaded with trichinosis larvae, served raw, and
eaten by Bismark.
Dr. Virchow became the world medical dictator and the arbiter of scientific controversy. He was
usually right, but was skeptical about micro-organisms as causes of diseases. When Dr. Pasteur first
demonstrated the streptococcus bacteria that cause human infections, Dr. Virchow was in the
audience. Everybody looked to see what old Dr. Virchow would say about the new claim.
Dr. Virchow nodded and walked out without saying anything, and Dr. Pasteur and his germs
became official.
Dr. Louis Pasteur (late 1800's) was the first person to conquer diseases using the methods of
laboratory science. He first solved the mystery of bad-tasting wine, then explained and prevented
epidemic disease among silkworms, anthrax in sheep, and finally rabies in humans. Dr. Pasteur was
a chemist and could not stand the sight of blood. He considered going to medical school but never
went because he was terrified of having to watch an autopsy.
Dr. Virchow's student Dr. Julius Cohnheim worked out much of the pathology of acute
inflammation and of tuberculosis. Dr. Cohnheim's pupil, the flamboyant Dr. Paul Ehrlich, devised
many of the stains still in use by pathologists.
Ehrlich In the mid-twentieth century, pathologists really started thinking about diseases of molecules -- the
molecular basis of disease. Progress in biochemistry unravelled the defects in inborn errors of
metabolism. Dr. Linus Pauling (1949) worked out the physical chemistry of red cell sickling in
sickle cell anemia. Every effective therapy today is the result of the laboratory study of disease.
Pauling Today there is a new emphasis on disease as it involves whole persons. Today's most important
diseases are lifestyle-related. Everyone recognizes the importance of habits in acquiring lung cancer,
emphysema, heart disease, cirrhosis, and AIDS. Emotional factors influence other diseases,
including high blood pressure, asthma, skin diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, and perhaps even
cancer. Physicians are alert now to the ways in which illness affects a person's whole life, to the
emotional needs of patients that cause them to seek medical attention, and to their spiritual needs,
patient dignity, and their rights to make decisions about their own health care.
* In the twentieth century, two pathologists have distinguished themselves as spokespersons for
human conscience, though you might not agree with one or both. Pathologist-turned-politician
Salvador Allende took steps to turn Chile into his dream of a Marxist state. (Your lecturer considers
this a misguided ideal.) Canadian John McCrae wrote the brilliant World War I lyric,
In Flanders
Fields. (Read it. Is it a militaristic poem, an anti-war poem, or both?)
In Medical Pathology, you will think about all these things at once. Pathology deals with abnormal
gross and microscopic anatomy, abnormal biochemistry, and abnormal physiology. Disease
involves molecules, cells, organs, whole persons, and groups of people. We are sensitive to all
aspects of disease. We'll put everything together in this course.
-- Ed Friedlander, M.D.
Why do we say that today's medicine is "scientific"? You will often hear people say, "That's only a
theory", "That's not proven", "Medical schools do not teach the true causes of disease", or "Seventy
percent of what you're taught in medical school is proven wrong within ten years." To give
thoughtful answers, you need to know the following definitions of things that make up the business
of science:
Fact: (1) A simple observation anybody can make (for example, grass is green, my shoe is untied, it
is raining today). (2) A simple observation that anybody could confirm with instruments, assuming
the correctness of current theories (for example, valine is substituted for glutamic acid at position 6
of the hemoglobin beta-chains in sickle cell disease).
Conjecture: A guess, educated or not (for example, all disease is ultimately caused by pressure on
the spinal nerves).
Hypothesis: An educated guess that someone plans to test honestly (for example, let's actually
TEST that conjecture about spinal nerves).
Experiment: Something somebody does to test or refute a hypothesis, using adequate controls to
prevent self-deception, and planning to share the data with others (for example, let's do a
prospective, randomized study of the effects on asthma of chiropractic treatment vs. simple kindness
and human warmth).
Theory: An idea that explains a large number of observations, and which is not contradicted by any
observation (for example, the round earth, atoms and molecules, the circulation of the blood,
evolution, interleukin 1 as mediator of cell-cell communication).
A theory can never be "proved", it can only be "not falsified". (* For example, I will discard everything
I believe
about human origins if a person with real credentials as a paleontologist discovers a single,
modern-type human skull in a rock stratum found to be more than 1 million years old by
contemporary methods.) A falsified theory must be modified or discarded.
Knowledge: Facts and successful theories. A theory that works well ceases to be knowledge when a
more comprehensive, elegant, and/or successful theory replaces it (for example, Ptolemy's astronomy
was replaced by that of Copernicus; Newton's physics was modified by Einstein's;
Darwin's evolution has been clarified by the discovery
of the mechanisms of mutation and the idea that the
rate of change has varied tremendously.) According to
most of today's thinkers, theories are guides to action. Hence improving knowledge does not make
the previous theory "wrong", only "less true". Math and logic are probably also forms of
knowledge, and there may be others (ask a philosopher, or even an artist or theologian).
Proof: Ask a lawyer, mathematician, logician or theologian what this means. We don't use it much
in real science.
Science: This might best be defined as the process of advancing knowledge by doing experiments
and developing theories. It is the most cut-throat of all human endeavors, and scientists thrive on
finding flaws in one another's work. There are still plenty of gaps in human knowledge. However, I
know of no major theory since Ptolemy's astronomy that has been considered "successful" that has
subsequently been discarded.
Pseudoscience: Using the language and authority of science without using its methods. Recognize
pseudoscience by:
1. Unfalsifiable claims ("Nothing could convince me that Marxism isn't true"; "That's proof you are a
racist"; "You weren't healed because you didn't have enough faith"; "If you say you were not abused
sexually as a child, that proves you forgot"; "God planted the fossils to test our faith, and He also
changed the major laws of science"; "If your behavior seems to differ from what Freudian theory
would seem to predict, it's your Freudian defense mechanism"; "If a man is
accused of rape
without physical evidence
and he passes the lie detector test, he is merely in denial."
"Astrology fails only because our
understanding of the tremendous influence of the stars is still incomplete";
"I now realize that you, too, are part of the conspiracy", etc.)
2. Lack of original experiments and internal self-criticism;
3. Citing old problems, errors, and doubts ("Piltdown man",
issues during the discovery of HIV) to claim that current
thinking is fundamentally flawed (I hope you understand the difference between
empirical science and Euclid's built-from-the-bottom geometric theorems);
4. Claims that "scientists are suppressing the truth", "government scientists are blind dogmatists", and
"we are the true scientists";
5. Appeals to the public based on half-truths (for example, "If lecithin is a component of myelin, then
taking lecithin pills should help multiple sclerosis");
6. Claims to be "loving" and "spiritual", and that "those other doctors and scientists are not";
7. Unusual academic degrees (for example, "Metabolic Doctor" or "M.D.", awarded by a Tijuana
enema parlor);
8. Using "alternative theories" as the basis for a profitable business;
9. Eagerness to "debate" honest scientists in the public media where they will lie wholesale,
coupled with an extreme reluctance to testify in court under oath;
10. The fact that when its proponents are asked to present experimental data, they complain of "lack of
proper funding", or insist they will never "treat 'whole persons' as statistics", or cite the "Heisenberg
uncertainty principle", "Godol's theorem", or "postmodernism" as proof that all experimentation is
invalid;
11. The fact that when its proponents are caught falsifying data or quotations (both widespread
practices), they do not answer the charges but instead respond with vicious personal attacks.
12. A quack may reasonably be defined as a pseudoscientist who is selling something, and a charlatan as
a cynical pseudoscientist who knows he or she is deceiving the public.
Junk science is one step above pseudoscience.
It's a term, mostly used by lawyers,
for poor natural-science (old studies, bad studies, discredited
studies; also statistics and tables out of context as in pseudoscience)
used in arguments directed at the
public. Real work is cited accurately, but very selectively
and misleadingly. Much of this is obviously intentional by agitprop writers.
Today's grown-ups are well-aware of this,
and generally dismiss "new information about health risks" and
"warnings of impending environmental catastrophes" as junk science.
Pseudoscience and junk science
appeal to basic human emotions (i.e., people are all-too-eager
to believe lies that make them feel
intellectually or morally superior). The disinformation campaigns often make its proponents wealthy
and exert a massive influence on public policy. If you check your bookstores, you will discover that
the public buys much more pseudoscience and junk science
than real science. The United States public currently spends
more money on health frauds than the total funds (government and private) used for medical
research. The Supreme Court's "Daubert" decision made it the judge's
responsibility to keep junk science and pseudoscience out of the courtroom
(thanks Mr. Justice Scalia).
Sub-science is my term for areas in which measurement is difficult and the subject matter is of great
human importance. Ideology (i.e., emotionally-held, ill-founded beliefs that are contrary to
common-sense) tends to dominate. Much of health-maintenance, psychology and education, and
almost all of sociology, are obviously sub-science. Unfortunately, sub-science has an even greater
influence on politics than does pseudoscience.
It is evidence of your own integrity that you have chosen scientific medicine. Your reward is that
scientific knowledge gives you tremendous power to deal with the world as it really is. I know you'll
all use this power to do good. -- ERF.
NIH photo
NIH photo
NIH photo
NIH photo
NIH photo
NIH photo
NIH photo
Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.
-- Salvor Hardin (Asimov's character)
I. HONESTY (TRUTH-TELLING)
Hippocrates: It is your duty to lie when it is for the greater good of your patients.
Immanuel Kant: We would want everyone to be honest.
Henry Sidgwick: Patients often cannot endure the truth.
Trend: Informed consent is now the norm; increased overall emphasis on honesty.
II. CONTRACT-KEEPING (PROMISE-KEEPING)
Hippocrates: The health care provider has made a contract with God, promising to do good for sick people.
Old Testament: Emphasis on covenant and faithfulness as the basis of relationships.
Modern law: Contract for health care is a business arrangement.
Trend: Health care workers repay society for their educations by doing good.
III. NON-MALEFICENCE (NOT DOING HARM)
Buddhism: Early emphasis on 5 abstentions (from violence, sexual immorality, stealing, lying, alcohol-and-drugs), generosity, and the 4 social emotions (love, compassion, sympathetic joy, impartiality), as essential to the pursuit of saving wisdom; the tradition tends to look at a doer's motives and the effects of an action on everybody involved
Hippocrates: "First do no harm"; forbade abortion, euthanasia, and sexual misconduct; required specialist referrals
Thomas Aquinas: Principle of double effect (J. Med. Eth. 26: 204, 2000) allows a lesser harm for a greater good.
Modern era: Expect side effects and complications from powerful remedies.
Trend: Focus on risk-benefit ratios to patient, cost-benefit ratios to society, quality of life concerns.
IV. JUSTICE
Karl Marx: Distribute care entirely on the basis of need.
Distributive justice: Distribute care according to a person's need, effort, merit, and/or contribution to society, and/or to make up for past injustices to individuals and/or groups.
Utilitarianism: Find some way to maximize private and public good.
Socrates, David Hume: Justice is a difficult thing to define.
Trends: Problems with allocation of scarce resources, especially providing inordinate amounts of care to certain small groups or those with lifestyle-related disease. This is the most impressive change I've seen in the "ethics" environment during my time as a physician, and I see it as a welcome retreat from both right-wing and left-wing ideology.
V. AUTONOMY (SELF-DETERMINATION)
John Stuart Mill: It is hard to tell who is really acting freely.
U.S. Founding Fathers: Inalienable rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
Roe v. Wade: In essence, the government should stay out of metaphysical questions about which there is no consensus.
Islamic cultures: Patients tend to regard the physician as God's mouthpiece, someone to be obeyed without your saying what you actually want. The idea of autonomy is alien, but physicians develop very close and loving relationships with entire families. Review: Hastings Center Report Nov-Dec. 2000.
Minimalist ethics: Let nature take its course whenever possible.
Trends: Informed consent, living wills, confidence-keeping; dominated medical ethics 1960-1980.
VI. BENEFICENCE (DOING GOOD)
Confucianism / Asian feudalism: Right living is strictly defined in terms of rules of propriety in hierarchical dyadic relationships (see Aust. N.Z. J. Psych. 24: 510, 1990).
Hippocrates: Health care provider's role is a holy calling to do good by directly helping others.
Claudius Galen: Emphasis on compassion and competence.
Rabbinic law: Preserving life overrides other laws and is a central principle of ethics
Christianity: God's love for each individual is key to ethics.
Reagan administration (early 1980's): Health care workers must preserve helpless life of any quality over wishes of parents or "good of society", but must also honor parents' religious objections to health care.
Oregon: Spend public funds for health care where they will do the greatest good for the greatest number of deserving citizens. Don't treat when chances for a decent life are very slim. Make sure poor kids get immunizations and eyeglasses. Liver transplants may be available for children with biliary atresia. But if you ruined your liver by drinking alcohol and want a new one, pay for it yourself.
Bush Administration (1992): The Oregon plan is unconstitutional because it discriminates against alcoholics, very small premature babies, and other handicapped.
Clinton Administration (1993): The Oregon plan is acceptable.
Trends: Beneficence, as classically defined, is usually rejected as "paternalism" in favor of the other principles. This is certain to change as the need for prioritizing becomes more acute.
VII. PREVENTING AND RELIEVING SUFFERING
Cassell: The health care provider's role is to relieve suffering of all sorts, not to generate more (NEJM 306: 639, 1982) by prolonging agony and impoverishing families. Good reading.
1990's: A few major countries legalized active euthanasia.
VIII. TWO OVER-ARCHING PHILOSOPHIC THEORIES FOR ALL OF ETHICS
Formalism (nonconsequentialism): An action is right or wrong in-and-of itself. Most contemporary discussions of medical ethics (both "religious" and "secular") are formalist, which explains some of the characteristics of these discussions (i.e., fantasy; they degenerate almost immediately into shouting, pouting, and name-calling). A subcategory is virtues ethics: an action is right or wrong depending on whether the practitioner exhibits the philosopher's favorite virtue(s).
Consequentialism: A particular action is right or wrong depending on what may reasonably be expected to result from that particular action. Consequentialists (utilitarians, pragmatists, silly-scenario folks, etc.) supposedly ignore individual imperatives for the "good of society". Consequentialism is at best an uncomfortable position for any health care provider, even in the managed care era.
CONCLUSION:
The tough "medical ethics" questions are philosophical and perhaps spiritual, rather than strictly "medical" or "scientific". The law will surely continue to change. You may not reach all the same conclusions as other thoughtful people. However, these principles will serve as useful guides for your thinking, and to the ethical course of action, in the vast majority of cases.
INTRODUCTION
In caring for sick patients in whom you suspect cardiac or pulmonary disease, you will frequently order blood gas determination.
Arterial blood is collected in a special syringe and sent to the laboratory on ice for immediate analysis.
Within a few minutes, you know the patient's arterial pH, PaO2, and PaCO2, and from these the lab calculates the arterial HCO3-, hemoglobin % saturation, and base excess.
(Instruments that determine "electrolytes" on venous blood report the "total CO2". Because the pKa of H2CO3 is 6.1, "total CO2" closely approximates the venous or arterial HCO3- at any pH compatible with life. However, when you send arterial blood for arterial blood gases, you get the actual arterial HCO3-, calculated using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation.)
Interpreting these numbers is tricky and depends on an understanding of basic physiology.
* NORMAL VALUES
Arterial pH = 7.35-7.45
Arterial PO2 = 80-110 mm Hg
Arterial PCO2 = 32-48 mm Hg
Arterial calculated HCO3- = 18-23 mEq/L
Venous total CO2 = 22-26 mEq/L
CARBON DIOXIDE
Most of the "carbon dioxide" in the blood is tied up as HCO3-, which is in equilibrium with H2CO3 and CO2 in the blood.
No matter how sick a person gets, the alveolar walls remain permeable to carbon dioxide. Therefore, the entire "bicarbonate buffer system" is in equilibrium with the alveolar carbon dioxide content.
Alveolar carbon dioxide content in turn depends on adequacy of pulmonary ventilation. ("How effectively is the lung getting rid of CO2 that isn't required for buffering the blood?")
If pulmonary ventilation is decreased (decreased respiratory drive from drugs or in CNS disease or COPD, muscle weakness, restrictive lung disease, obstructed airways, or fluid in alveoli), there will be increased alveolar carbon dioxide content and thus increased arterial PCO2. Respiratory acidosis results.
(Another cause of increased alveolar carbon dioxide content is increased carbon dioxide content of inspired air, i.e., rebreathing air using a paper bag. Respiratory compensation of metabolic alkalosis will also decrease pulmonary ventilation.)
If pulmonary ventilation is increased (anxiety, hypoxia, fever), there will be decreased alveolar carbon dioxide content and thus decreased arterial PCO2. Respiratory alkalosis results.
(Respiratory compensation of metabolic acidosis will also increase pulmonary ventilation.)
In pH disturbances of respiratory origin, arterial HCO3- (as calculated in the blood gas report) and venous HCO3- (as approximated by the "total CO2" measured in the electrolyte panel) will be altered in the same direction as arterial PCO2, especially if metabolic (renal) compensation has occurred.
The magnitude of this change, however, is never very great. Venous total CO2 less than 19 mEq/L generally indicates metabolic acidosis, and venous total CO2 greater than 30 generally indicates metabolic alkalosis.
As you know, venous PCO2 is only about 6 mm Hg higher than arterial PCO2, and a right-to-left shunt through the lung will produce a negligible increase in arterial PCO2.
OXYGEN
Because of the shape of the hemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve, normal hemoglobin is almost fully saturated when PaO2 is above 80 mm Hg.
(Remember arterial PO2 is the measure of the small amount of oxygen in solution in the plasma, not the oxygen bound to hemoglobin. Increasing arterial PO2 above the range 80-100 is not going to significantly improve overall oxygenation of the blood. Conversely, a drop in PaO2 below 60 mm Hg is bad.)
Unlike carbon dioxide, arterial PO2 depends on several factors. ("Are the alveoli being ventilated adequately and evenly, is all the right-sided cardiac output getting to the alveoli, and can oxygen diffuse through the alveolar-capillary membrane?")
Decreased ventilation of alveoli results in decreased alveolar oxygen content.
There may be decreased ventilation of all alveoli (drugs, CNS or muscle disease, restrictive lung disease, asthma, ARDS, pulmonary edema), or uneven ventilation (atelectasis, pneumonia, COPD, airways obstructed by secretions or tumor).
Because venous PO2 is only a fraction of arterial PO2 (especially in sickness, where tissue oxygen requirements may be increased and cardiac output may be low), shunting of venous blood through poorly-ventilated alveoli will result in a great decrease in arterial PO2.
(Perfusion without ventilation also results from right-to-left intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunts.)
Remember that, in health, increasing alveolar ventilation does not greatly increase alveolar oxygen content.
(Because inspired air is about 20% oxygen, alveolar oxygen content is increased about 1 mm Hg for every 5 mm Hg that alveolar carbon dioxide content is decreased. To increase alveolar oxygen content, have the patient breathe supplemental oxygen.)
Even fairly mild thickening of the alveolar walls (pulmonary edema, ARDS, interstitial fibrosis, lymphangitic carcinomatosis) renders them relatively impermeable to oxygen ("diffusion barrier").
If the problem is poor overall lung ventilation, PaO2 will drop and PaCO2 will rise noticeably. It is notoriously impossible to use blood gases, alone, to distinguish a right-to-left shunt (anatomic, physiologic) from too-thick alverolar septa.
REMEMBER:
Dead space is the volume of ventilation that does not exchange with the blood.
It includes anatomic dead space (large airways) and functional dead space (due to ventilation-perfusion mismatching, some of which is inevitable due to gravity.)
Increased dead space is usually due to pulmonary embolus or decreased right-sided cardiac output (shock, pulmonary hypertension.)
*The clinical dead-space equation:
Shunt fraction is the fraction of cardiac output that does not exchange with alveolar gas.
Because there is uneven distribution of ventilation in almost all lung disease, there is always an increase in shunt fraction.
Formulas to calculate the shunt fraction exist.
Base excess is a measure of the metabolic (i.e., nonrespiratory) component of a pH disturbance.
A positive base excess indicates the degree of metabolic alkalosis. A negative base excess indicates the degree of metabolic acidosis.
Base excess is calculated from the blood gases by a complicated formula (i.e., using a nomogram or calculator.)
INTRODUCTION
The principal extracellular cation is sodium; the principal extracellular anions are bicarbonate, chloride, and proteins.
The principal intracellular cation is potassium; the principal intracellular anions are phosphates and proteins.
Most of the body's calcium is extracellular; most of the body's magnesium is intracellular.
Of course, all the above are electrolytes. But when you "order electrolytes on a patient", you are asking for serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate ("total CO2").
Remember that electrolytes are generally measured as milliequivalents per liter (meq/L). Remember also that an "equivalent" is a mole of charge.
Thus, a milliequivalent of univalent ions (sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate) is a millimole of these ions.
And a milliequivalent of divalent ions (calcium, magnesium) is half a millimole of these ions.
And since, around physiologic pH, phosphate anion is a mixture of H2PO4-1 and HPO4-2, it is very inconvenient to talk about milliequivalents of phosphate anion. That value would even be different at different pH values.
As a result, only the univalent ions are generally reported in meq/L.
Very generally, here is what an "electrolyte panel" tells you:
Sodium tells you if the patient is dehydrated or overhydrated.
Potassium tells you the patient's serum potassium status. (This must be kept as close to normal as possible.)
Bicarbonate tells you if the patient has metabolic acidosis or alkalosis.
Chloride is provided so that you can calculate whether the patient has an abnormally high anion gap.
* Indications for ordering serum electrolytes are very broad.
All fluid therapy on seriously ill patients is guided by monitoring serum electrolytes. (You will learn a great deal about this during your rotations.)
Patients on digitalis and/or diuretics, with renal failure, or with extensive tissue injury especially need to have their potassium levels watched.
Patients who are post-surgical, febrile, dehydrated, unconscious, having seizures, and many others all need to have "electrolytes" checked.
* NORMAL RANGES
Sodium = 136-145 meq/L
Potassium = 3.5-5.0 meq/L
Chloride = 96-106 meq/L
Bicarbonate = 24-30 meq/L ("total carbon dioxide content")
Anion gap = 8-16 meq/L
SERUM OSMOLALITY
Before we look more closely at sodium and potassium, here is a formula for the bedside calculation of serum osmolality.
glucose urea nitrogen
Serum osmolality = (2 x sodium) + (glucose/3) + (urea nitrogen / 20)
(Variations on this formula exist; this version is fine.)
Serum osmolality is one of the most tightly regulated physiologic parameters. Normal range is 275-295, lower in babies.
The lab can measure it directly by freezing point depression, though the above formula is good so long as the serum is not loaded with ethanol, mannitol, ketoacids, etc.
Serum osmolality is a better measure of water depletion or water overload than serum sodium. See below.
SERUM SODIUM
Increased serum sodium is, for practical purposes, due only to dehydration. (A possible exception would be a psychotic or child abuse victim with table salt intoxication.)
Inability to replace water loss due to burns, sweating, drainage; inability to replace respiratory, urinary, and fecal losses (babies, the severely disabled.)
Diabetes insipidus (posterior pituitary disease, renal collecting tubule disease)
Osmotic diuresis due to hyperglycemia (leading to hyperosmolar nonketotic diabetic coma), ketoacidosis, mannitol administration, some patients with renal failure.
Rarely, hyperaldosteronism can cause actual hypernatremia. Usually there is either a corresponding increase in plasma volume (drinking fountain, mild edema results) or (most often) ANF (atriopeptin) clears water and sodium.
Dehydration from insufficient water intake is common in the very-sick, especially before they get to the hospital. "Breast-milk-only" zealots who had lactation failure and let their babies become severely sick as a result: AJFMP 19: 19, 1998.
Decreased serum sodium
This is a very common problem in clinical medicine.
The danger is that decreased serum osmolality will result in cerebral edema. Respiratory arrest and/or brain damage can and do occur (Br. Med. J. 304: 1218, 1992).
Before you decide to treat a low serum sodium, be sure it is not just the result of dilution by some other osmotically active substance.
Check the urea ("BUN") and glucose (these values come with many "electrolyte profiles") and calculate the approximate osmolality using the formula.
Remember ethanol, * M-proteins, mannitol, and triglycerides (* the last is important if the level is above 2000 mg/dL, normal is a tenth that) can also depress the sodium level while osmolality remains normal.
If in doubt, have the lab check the serum osmolality.
"Genuine" low sodium (synonymous, in practice, with low serum osmolality) will be found to be due to renal sodium wasting, extra-renal sodium wasting, water overload, inappropriate hADH, or cachexia.
In most cases, it is helpful to check the urine sodium to decide which mechanism is operating.
Remember that, in health, urinary sodium output corresponds to dietary intake.
Renal sodium wasting: diuretic therapy (and diuretic abuse, currently popular), Addison's disease, some renal interstitial disease.
Urine sodium is usually above 20 meq/L in these disorders.
Extra-renal sodium wasting: losses because of vomiting, diarrhea, suction, surgical drains, burns, or heavy sweating. In each case, hyponatremia develops when water replacement occurs!
Urine sodium is usually below 10 meq/L in these disorders
Water overload is seen in psychogenic water drinking, overzealous IV therapy with "D5/W" or the like, and in generalized edema and ascites (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome.)
In generalized edema, the effective circulating blood volume is low. The kidneys are unable to dispose of all the water the patient drinks. There may also be increased hADH, or the patient may have been receiving a sodium-wasting diuretic. These factors override the effects of secondary aldosteronism, and result in a low serum sodium.
Urine sodium is usually below 10 meq/L in these disorders.
Syndrome of inappropriate hADH: a special cause of water overload. It may be due to oat cell carcinoma of the lung, porphyria, * CNS disease, * chlorpropamide, TB, or other causes (even old age -- see Ann. Int. Med. 99: 185, 1983.)
Urine sodium is usually above 20 meq/L in "SIADH."
Criteria exist for the diagnosis of this problem; unfortunately, hADH assays are not readily available. Essential features are:
Cachexia results in serum sodium levels that are often somewhat low and which cannot be corrected by fluid restriction or sodium chloride administration.
Probably this results from the loss of intracellular protein anions, so that intracellular osmolality (which must equal extracellular osmolality) becomes low.
This is also called the "reset osmostat syndrome" or the "tired cell syndrome."
BEWARE: Correct lower serum sodium slowly, or risk central pontine myelinolysis!
SERUM POTASSIUM
Increased serum potassium:
Renal failure is by far the commonest cause of increased serum potassium.
Other causes:
Artifactual: Unfortunately very common! (see Br. Med. J. 291: 890, 1985)
Decreased serum potassium: (Hosp. Pract. 22(1): 53, Jan. 15, 1987)
METABOLIC ACIDOSIS
Causes:
Loss of fixed base: renal tubular acidosis (inability of the proximal tubule to reabsorb bicarbonate normally), drainage of pancreatic fluid (rich in bicarbonate), diarrhea (rich in bicarbonate), Addison's disease (failure to reabsorb sodium in the distal tubule, thus retaining protons instead).
Each of these will result in hyperchloremic acidosis. (Why?)
Learn the types of renal tubular acidosis:
RTA type 1 ("Distal"): distal tubule has trouble excreting protons, or protons leak back in the collecting ducts
There is secondary hypercalciuria, with rickets, osteomalacia, kidney stones.
RTA type 2 ("Proximal"): proximal tubule has trouble reabsorbing bicarbonate
There is also potassium wasting.
RTA type 3: combination of 1 & 2, rare
RTA type 4: the kidney fails to produce renin (and therefore aldosterone) when it is required.
This is very common in patients with renal microvascular disease (diabetes, hypertension).
The acidosis is worst in hyperkalemia, since potassium suppresses the production of ammonia.
Abnormal presence of a nonvolatile acid: lactic acidosis, diabetic ketoacidosis (acetoacetic acid, beta-hydroxybutyric acid), uremia (sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, others), aspirin poisoning (salicylic acid), ethylene glycol poisoning (oxalic acid), methanol poisoning (formic acid.)
Each of these will result in an increased anion gap.
The anion gap, as usually defined, is sodium minus chloride minus bicarbonate. The normal value is 8-16 meq/L. (Why?)
Always calculate the anion gap when you encounter metabolic acidosis!
METABOLIC ALKALOSIS
Causes:
Loss of fixed acid: vomiting, nasogastric suction, hyperaldosteronism (excess reabsorption of sodium in the distal tubule, thus losing protons instead -- Conn's syndrome, Cushing's syndrome, licorice toxicity).
Addition of fixed base: bicarbonate administration, milk-alkali syndrome
Neither of these mechanisms results in a metabolic alkalosis that can be reversed by saline administration, i.e., they produce "chloride nonresponsive metabolic alkalosis."
Water lack requiring renal bicarbonate retention: dehydration from most causes (invalidism, diarrhea, laxative abuse, diuretics, suction), often with hypokalemia (lack of potassium to exchange for reabsorbed sodium in the nephron forces loss of protons.)
The kidney is forced, in severe dehydration, to retain sodium bicarbonate in order to retain water.
This type of metabolic alkalosis can often be reversed by saline administration, i.e., it is "chloride responsive metabolic alkalosis."
QUESTION: What effect would very low serum albumin (as in cirrhosis or the nephrotic syndrome) have on calculated anion gap? What effect would a cationic M-protein have?
FUTURE FORENSIC PATHOLOGISTS: Think the death was due to an electrolyte / glucose / alcohol problem without obvious anatomic correlates? Check the chemistry of the vitreous humor, which for many, many hours closely mimics the blood chemistry over the few days prior to death.
Vitreous potassium: Increases linearly by 0.17 mEq/L per hour pretty much independent of environment, supposedly. Don't rely on this completely.
Vitreous EtOH: around 90% of blood EtOH, stays fairly steady after death
BUN / creatinine: change very little after death, and closely reflect levels on the day prior to death
Na+, Ca++, Mg++: reflect levels on the day prior to death
Good reading: Tedeschi's Forensic Path, Ch. 45.
Reference Ranges for Common Lab Tests
and Physiological Parameters
NOTE: These are commonly-cited ranges. "Normal" depends on the technique, the lab, and the population.
SYSTEMIC BLOOD PRESSURE: Around 120/80 mmHg
PULMONARY BLOOD PRESSURE: Around 25/7 mmHg
PULMONARY VENOUS PRESSURE: ("wedge pressure"): 1-5 mmHg
CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE: -5 to 10 mmHg
PORTAL VENOUS PRESSURE: 10 mmHg
WHITE CELL COUNT... 4.8-10.8 x 103
RED CELL COUNT... Men 4.7-6.1 x 106; Women 4.2-5.4 x 106
HEMOGLOBIN
Men 14-18 gm/dL
Women 12-16 gm/dL
MEAN CORPUSCULAR VOLUME
Men 80-94 fL
Women 81-99 fL
NOTE: Pay less attention to hematocrit, MCH, and MCHC; these are derived values.
RED CELL SIZE DISTRIBUTION WIDTH... 11.5-14.5
PLATELET COUNT ... 130-400 x 103
MEAN PLATELET VOLUME ... 7.4-10.4 fL
ABSOLUTE LYMPHOCYTE COUNT ... 1.2-3.4 x 103 (3.0-7.0 x 103 or so for kids)
ABSOLUTE MONOCYTE COUNT ... 0.11-0.59 x 103
ABSOLUTE GRANULOCYTE COUNT ... 1.8-6.5 x 103
Almost always, almost all of these are neutrophils. The large majority of these should be mature forms, not bands.
ABSOLUTE EOSINOPHIL COUNT... less than or equal to 400
SERUM SODIUM ... 135-153 mEq/L
SERUM POTASSIUM ... 3.5-5.3 MEq/L
SERUM CHLORIDE ... 95-105 mEq/L
SERUM BICARBONATE ... 24-31 mEq/L
SERUM GLUCOSE ... 70-110 mg/dL fasting
SERUM UREA NITROGEN (BUN) ... 5-25 mg/dL
SERUM CREATININE ... 0.5-1.4 mg/dL
SERUM CALCIUM ... 8.7-10.7 mg/dL
SERUM MAGNESIUM ... 1.6-2.4 mg/dL
SERUM PHOSPHORUS ... 2.6-4.9 mg/dL
SERUM URIC ACID ... 2.5-9.2 mg/dL
SERUM CHOLESTEROL... Decision Level 200 mg/dL
SERUM TRIGLYCERIDES ... 30-200 mg/dL fasting (a dubious "normal range")
TOTAL PROTEIN ... 6.1-8.0 gm/dL
ALBUMIN ... 3.5-4.9 gm/dL
TOTAL BILIRUBIN ... 0.0-1.2 mg/dL
ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ... 37-107 U/L
CREATINE KINASE (CK, CPK) ... 61-224 U/L
CPK isoenzymes to remember...
MM = CK3 :Think skeletal muscle
MB = CK2 :Think cardiac muscle
BB = CK1 :"Brain enzyme", but you'll seldom see it
LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE (LD, LDH) 94-172 U/L
LDH isoenzymes to remember...
1 :Heart, kidney, red cells
5 :Skeletal muscle, liver
GLUTAMATE OXALOACETIC TRANSAMINASE (GOT, SGOT, AST) ... 12-45 U/L
GLUTAMATE PYRUVATE TRANSAMINASE (GPT, SGPT, ALT) ... 7-40 U/L
RETICULOCYTE COUNT... 0.5-1.5%
DIRECT COOMBS TEST... NEGATIVE
FLUORESCENT ANA... less than or equal to 1:20
annulus... little ring | anser... goose | acanth... spine, prickle |
aceto... vinegar | acou... hear | acro... extremity, tip, sharp |
actin... ray, beam | acu... sharp, abrupt, sudden | adeno... gland |
adipo... fat | aero... air | (a)esth... perception |
agogue... leader | agon... contest, struggle | ala... wing |
alb... white | algo... pain | alien... stranger, strange |
allelo... one another, mutual | amauros... blind | am(o)eb... constantly changing |
ambi/amph... both sides | ambly... dim, faint | amnio... amnion, "bowl" |
amylo... starch | andro... male | angio... vessel (blood, bile) |
ankyl... bent, crooked; a joint locked in one position | anthem... flower | anthrac... black |
anthro... man / human | aort... aorta | aphro... froth, sexual love |
aqu... water | arachn... spider, spiderweb | archo... ancient, beginning |
argy... silver, shiny | artero... artery (as opposed to vein) | arthro... joint |
artic... little joint | asthm... panting, short breaths | athero... gruel |
atri... entry chamber | axilla... armpit | axo... center, axis |
aud... hear | aur... hear | aus... hear |
auto... self | aux... make grow | azo... nitrogen |
bac(t)... rod | ball... throw | balano... acorn, glans |
blast... sprout | blenno... snot | bleph... eyelid |
bol... throw | brachi... arm | brady... slow |
branch... gill | bronch... bronchus | bucc... cheek (inside) |
burs... bursa, purse | caes... cut deep | c(h)ord... notochord |
c(o)ele... rupture | carpo... wrist | calci... limestone |
calco... heel, spur | calyc... cup | campy... bend |
canc... crab | capo... head, expanded part | centr... center |
carbo... charcoal, carbon | carcin... crab | carcinoma... cancer from epithelium |
card... heart, heart-shape | carot... great neck arteries | carpo... wrist |
caus... burn | centesis... puncture | centr... center |
cep(h)... head, expanded part | cephal... head | cept... seize, take |
cereb(r)... brain | cervic... neck | ch(e)ir... hand |
chemo... chemistry | chlor... light green | chol(e)... bile |
chondr... cartilage; grain | chorea... dance | chori... chorionic membrane |
chrom... color | chron... time, long time | chyle... digested food juice |
cide... killing, "falling" | cise... cut deep | cili... eyelash |
cion... uvula | clast... break | claustr... barrier |
cleido... collarbone, key | clino... bed | clivus... slope |
coagul... coagulate, clot | coccus... berry | coccyx... cuckoo, cuckoo bill |
collic... hill | collo... glue | collus... neck |
conios... dust | cond... hard knob | core... dolly, pupil (of eye) |
cori... leather | corn... horn | cox(a)... hip |
corp... physical body | cre(s)c... grow | cribi / cribri... sieve |
crine... secretion ("separation") | cubit... elbow | cubo... lay down |
cule... little | culpo... vagina | cuneo... wedge |
cutis... skin | cyan... dark blue | cycl... circle, wheel |
cysto... urinary bladder | cyto... cell | dacr... tear (from the eye) |
dacty... finger | demos... people | dens... tooth |
dent... tooth | derm... skin | desm... harden, bind together |
desis... binding | desmo... hard | dextro... right-sided |
diadocho... succeed, take over | didym... twin | digi(t)... finger, toe |
diphth... leathery membrane | docho... cup, container | drepan... sickle |
dromo... running a race; course | duc,...duct lead, guide | dynia... pain |
echin... spiny | echo... echo | ectasia... dilatation |
edem(a)... excess tissue fluid | embol... bottle stopper | embryo... embryo, fetus |
em(ia)... blood | enceph... brain | enchyme... filling, installation |
entero... intestine | ergo... work | erythro... red |
esthesia... perception | f(a)eco... feces, refuse | fac... make, build, do, perform |
facie... face, countenance, looks | fasc... bundle, fascia | fec... make, build, do, perform |
fer... carrying, bearing | fibr... fibrous | fic... make, build, do, perform |
fis,...fid split, cleave, divide | flagel... whip | flav... yellow |
flat... blow | flect... bend | flex... bend |
fora/foro... make a hole | fornic... arch | fract... break into pieces |
frag... break into pieces | fring... break into pieces | fuge... flee |
fun... melt, pour | fus... melt, pour | gala(k)... milk |
gam(y)... marry | gangl... knot | gangr... gangrene, gnawing sore |
galact... milk | gastr... stomach, belly | gemin... twin |
gen... become, beget, produce | genesis... origin | genu... knee |
ger... old age | gest... bring forth, produce | glans... acorn |
gleno... shoulder | gli(o)... glial cells, literally "glue" | glob... sphere, ball, round body |
glomer... tuft | gloss... tongue | glute... buttocks |
gnatho... jaw | gnosis... know | gogue... lead |
gono... offspring, product, seed, semen | gonio... angle | gracile... slender |
gram... record | gran... grain | graph... writing, scratching |
gryph... claw | gynec... female | (h)(a)em... blood |
habeo... to hold, habit, general state of | halluc... big toe | helic... spiral |
helm... worm | hermaphro... male and female in one body | hepat... liver |
hernia... rupture, hernia | hidr... sweat | hippo... horse |
histo... tissue, web, cloth | hy(a)l... glass, primitive material | hydatid... water drop |
hydro... water | hypno... sleep | hystero... uterus |
iatric... healing | iatro... physician | ichth... fish |
idio... self, personal, private | inguin... part of body from groin to hip | insul... island |
irid... rainbow, bright-color circle | ischi... hip joint | islet... island |
ject... throw, hurl | jejun... hungry | junc... join together |
jug... join together | jux... join together | kera... horny |
kerato... skin surface, cornea, horn | kine... set in motion | kyn... dog |
lachry... tear (from the eye) | labio... lip | lacto... milk |
lal... babble, talk | latero... side | lecith... egg yolk |
leiomyo... smooth muscle | lein... spleen | lens... lentil |
lepros... rough and rotting off | lepto... thin, fine, slender | leuco... white |
levo... left-sided | liga(t)... bind together, bandage | ling... tongue |
lith... stone | lumbo... lower back, loin | lumbri... earthworm |
lumen... the tube down a hollow organ | lymph... "clear fresh water" | lysis... breaking down |
malar... cheek (outside) | mal(i)... abnormal, bad | malacia... soft |
malako... soft | medi... middle portion | medulla... soft inner part |
meli... sweet | malleo... hammer | mere... part |
manu... hand | mara... wither | mast(i)... whip, flog, beat |
mast(o)... breast | mea... passage | meatus... external opening |
meios... lessening | melano... black | melia... limb |
mening... meninges | men(i)s... moon, month | ment... mind, chin |
meter... measure | metro... uterus | mito... thread |
mnem... memory | mnes... memory | mob... move |
morb... sick | morph... shapes, dreams | mot... move |
mur(al)... wall | musc... mouse, muscle | |
myelo... soft, pith | myi... fly (insect) | myo... muscle |
myxo/muco... slime | narco... sleep | naso... nose |
necro... dead | nephelo... cloud | nephr... kidney |
nerv... nerve | neuro... nerve | nos,...nox nasty, sickening |
nous... mind, spirit | nyct... night | occiput... back of the head |
ocul... eye | (h)odo... way, path, road | odon... tooth |
odyn... pain | olfact... smell | oma... tumor/lump |
omen(t)... omentum | omphalo... belly button | on(e/t)... to be |
onco... tumor, mass | onycho... nail (finger/toe) | oo... egg (umlaut over second "o" is optional) |
oophor... ovary (umlaut over second "o" is optional) | op... eye, see, etc. | ophth... eye |
opio... poppy juice | opsi... late | opson... relish, meat seasoning |
orbi... wheel | orch... testis | org... work |
oro... mouth | ortho... straight | os... bone, mouth |
osm... smell | ost(eo)... bone | ot(o)... ear |
ovin... sheep | oxy... oxygen, acid | p(a)ed... child |
palpebr... eyelid | pap... nipple | par(i)t... have a baby |
parietal... wall | partheno... virgin | partum... birth |
patho... disease, misery | pect... chest | pelvis... basin |
pes/ped... foot | phage... eat | phakos... lentil, lens of the eye |
pharmako... sorcery, poison, drug | phase... phase | pheo... ugly, dusky |
phero... carry, bear | philo... like, love | phlebo... vein |
phleg... flame | phoco... seal (the animal) | phoro... carry, bear |
phos/phot... light | phragm... divide into two, wall off | phren... mind, breath |
phth... waste away, wither | phyllo... leaf-like | physio... nature |
phyte... a plant | pineo... pine cone | pinna... feather |
pino... drink | pisi... pea | pituit... snot |
placent... cake, placenta | plak... cake | plantar... sole of the foot |
plasm... molded | plast... molded | platy... flat |
plegia... stroke, paralysis | pleur... pleura ("side of ribs") | plex... braid, wind together |
plexy... stroke | plic... braid, wind together | pn(e)... breath |
pod(o)... foot | poie(sis)... making | polio... gray; gray matter of the nervous system |
pollic... thumb | pomp... precede, parade | porph... purple |
porta... door | posthe... foreskin | prac... done |
prag... done | prax... done | pre/pro... before |
procto... rectum | pron(o)... prone, face down | proto... first |
pseud... false | psyche... spirit, mind | psychr... cold, frigid |
pter... wing | pto... droop | pty(alo)... spit |
pulmo... lung | punct... prick, little spot | pupa... doll, miniature figure |
purp... purple | pyelo... vat, basin, pelvis | pykno... shrivelled |
pyo... pus | p(u/y)ri... pear | pyr(o)... fever (cognate to "fire") |
radi... rod | r(h)ach... backbone | re(i)n... kidney |
ret(ic)... net | rhabdo... striated muscle | rhaph... sew together |
rheo... flow | rheum... runny stuff | rhino... nose |
riso... smile | rrha(g)... discharge from a burst vessel | rub(r)... red |
sacc... sack | sacch(ar)... sugar | salpinx... trumpet, oviduct |
sang(ui)... blood | sapro... dead | sarc(o)... flesh |
sarcoma... cancer from connective tissue or muscle | scato... feces, filth | scapho... boat |
schi(s/z)... split | sclero... hard | scope... examine carefully |
sebo... hard fat, skin grease, suet | sec/seg... cut | sella... saddle |
seps/sept... make rotten | septo... fence, partition | sero... whey, wet protein |
sial... saliva | sinus... hollow or pocket | skel... dried up, skeleton |
soma/somy... body | spasmo... a drawing tight | spondylo... spine |
sphinct... bind tight, squeeze shut | sphygno... heartbeat | spir... breathing |
splanchn... innards | staphyl... bunch of grapes | stasis... standing up, being stable |
stat... stop | statio... standing up, being stable | staxis... drip, drop |
stem... standing up, being stable | steato... fat | sterco... feces |
sthen... strength | stigm... spot | stole... to pull, to draw |
stom(a)... mouth | stomy... mouth | strepto... wavy |
stylo... stylus | sudo... sweat | sulco... plowed furrow |
syring... pipe, tube, reed | tachy... fast, swift | tact... touch |
tainia... band, tapeworm | talo... ankle | tasis... stretch |
tarso... flat plate | taxo... arrangement, put in order | telo... the tip, the end |
temporal... temple | ten(d)o... stretch, tendon | terato... monster |
theca... box (sheath, covering) | thel... breast, covering layer | thenar... palm, sole |
thym... mind, spirit, mood | thym... warty mass, thymus gland | thyro... oblong shield |
toco... have a baby | tom(e)... cut | tono... stretch |
topo... place | tort... twist | tox(o)... bow, arrow, poisoned arrow |
trema... hole | tricho... hair | trophy... grow/food |
tryps... break into many pieces, crush | tuber... bump, potato(e) | typho... smoky, delirious fever |
typhl... cecum | unguis... nail (finger, toe) | uro... urine |
uvo... grape | vacc... cow | vago... wanderer |
valgus... turned outward | varus... turned inward | vaso... blood vessel |
velo... veil, curtain, cover | vener... sexual acts, lusty | veno... vein (as opposed to artery) |
vert... turn | vesico... bladder | viscero... innards |
volv... turn around, twist around | xantho... yellow | xeno... stranger |
xero... dry | z(a)o... to live | zoo;... animals (umlaut over second "o" is optional) |
zema... boiled | zygo... yoke | zyme... ferment |
a(d)-... towards | a(n)-... without | ab-... from |
ab(s)-... away from | ad-... towards | allo-... other, another |
ambi-... both | amphi-... on both sides, around | ana-... up to, back, again, movement from |
aniso-... different, unequal | ante-... before, forwards | anti-... against, opposite |
ap-, apo-... from, back, again | bi(s)-... twice, double | bio-... life |
brachy-... short | cata-... down | circum-... around |
con-... together | contra-... against | cyte-... cell |
de-... from, away from, down from | deca-... ten | di(s)-... two |
dia-... through, complete | di(a)s... separation | diplo-... double |
dolicho-... long | dur-... hard, firm | dys-... bad, abnormal |
e-, ec-... out, from out of | ecto-... outside, external | ek-... out |
em-... in | en-... into | endo-... into |
ent-... within | epi-... on, up, against, high | eso-... I will carry |
eu-... well, abundant, prosperous | eury-... broad, wide | ex-, exo-... out, from out of |
extra-... outside, beyond, in addition | haplo-... single | hapto-... bind to |
hemi-... half | hept-... seven | hetero-... different |
hex-... six | homo-... same | hyper-... above, excessive |
hypo-... below, deficient | im-, in-... not | in-... into, to |
infra-... below, underneath | inter-... among, between | intra-... within, inside, during |
intro-... inward, during | iso-... equal,same | juxta-... adjacent to |
kata-... down, down from | macro-... large | magno-... large |
8b>medi-... middle | mega-... large | megalo-... very large |
meso-... middle | meta-... beyond, between | micro-... small |
neo-... new | non-... not | ob-... before, against |
octa-... eight | octo-... eight | oligo-... few |
pachy-... thick | pan-... all | para-... beside, to the side of, wrong |
pent-... five | per-... by, through, throughout | peri-... around, round-about |
pleo-... more than usual | poly... many | post-... behind, after |
pre-... before, in front, very | pros-... besides | prox-... besides |
pseudo-... false, fake | quar(t)-... four | re, red-... back, again |
retro-... backwards, behind | semi-... half | sex-... six |
sept-... seven | sub-... under, beneath | super-... above, in addition, over |
supra-... above, on the upper side | syn-... together, with | sys-... together, with |
tetra-... four | thio-... sulfur | trans-... across, beyond |
tri-... three | uni-... one | ultra-... beyond, besides, over |
-ase... fermenter | -ate... do | -cide... killer |
-c(o)ele... cavity, hollow | -ectomy... removal of, cut out | -form... shaped like |
-ia... got | -iasis... full of | -ile... little version |
-illa... little version | -illus... little version | -in... stuff |
-ism... theory, characteristic of | -itis... inflammation | -ity... makes a noun of quality |
-ium... thing | -ize... do | -logy... study of, reasoning about |
-megaly... large | -noid... mind, spirit | -oid... resembling, image of |
-ogen... precursor | -ol(e)... alcohol | -ole... little version |
-oma... tumor (usually) | -osis... full of | -ostomy... "mouth-cut" |
-pathy... disease of, suffering | -penia... lack | -pexy... fix in place |
-plasty... re-shaping | -philia... affection for | -rhage... burst out |
-rhea... discharge, flowing out | -rhexis... shredding | -pagus... Siamese twins |
-sis... idea (makes a noun, typically abstract) | -thrix... hair | -tomy... cut |
-ule... little version | -um... thing (makes a noun, typically concrete)..... |
When science and medicine come to conjunction,
The pathologist's task matches structure and function.
And all in the spirit of good Doctor Still,
Path isn't just facts, it's a cognitive skill.
Though there's things to remember, I always must try
To help student doctors to ask and tell "Why?"
Our Path course is brief, packed in limited time,
So I work them intensely -- that's surely no crime.
A patient care-giver needs both knowledge and reason,
Must think clearly and well -- not to do so is treason.
The patients today are quite rightly demanding,
They want help and answers, all with clear understanding.
And with managed care, a modern physician
Must be teacher and advocate, not just technician.
They'll forget their Path trivia -- Pathology's task
Is to understand sickness -- that's all that I ask.
And so I talk less, make them think and do more,
And they say, "Hey! We're learning! That's what we're here for!"
So that's all I have -- a bit of bad verse on
Pathology learning geared for the whole person.
Visitors to www.pathguy.com reset Jan. 30, 2005: |
Ed says, "This world would be a sorry place if
people like me who call ourselves Christians
didn't try to act as good as
other
good people
."
Prayer Request
Teaching Pathology
PathMax -- Shawn E. Cowper MD's
pathology education links
Ed's Autopsy Page
Notes for Good Lecturers
Small Group Teaching
Socratic
Teaching
Preventing "F"'s
Classroom Control
"I Hate Histology!"
Ed's Physiology Challenge
Pathology Identification
Keys ("Kansas City Field Guide to Pathology")
Ed's Basic Science
Trivia Quiz -- have a chuckle!
Rudolf
Virchow on Pathology Education -- humor
Curriculum Position Paper -- humor
The Pathology Blues
Ed's Pathology Review for USMLE I
Pathological Chess |
Taser Video 83.4 MB 7:26 min |